SB 314 amends California's weights and measures law to treat electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) as a measuring device and to change how EV charging meters are tested, placed in service, registered, and enforced. The bill lets manufacturer- or supplier-audited EVSE be used commercially for the remainder of the inspection period (subject to sealing), requires counties to register and—under a short timetable—test older installations at no extra cost beyond registration fees, and directs the Division of Measurement Standards to provide statewide forms, guidance, and an optional in-factory compliance pathway.
The measure is focused on speeding and standardizing how EV charging meters enter commercial use while preserving county-level oversight tools (tags, conditional authorization, sample testing, and seizure in some cases). It also builds mechanisms for data sharing and funding searches to help counties acquire testing equipment, and sets several near-term deadlines for testing, guidance, and registration processes that will shape how quickly EVSE can be deployed and inspected in practice.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill treats EVSE as a regulated measuring instrument, allows manufacturer- or supplier-audited units to be used commercially during the secretary’s inspection period (but requires sealing), creates county registration and testing duties, and directs the Division of Measurement Standards to publish statewide forms and develop optional factory-audit compliance pathways.
Who It Affects
EVSE manufacturers and suppliers, site owners and operators (public charging hosts, employers, multifamily property owners), county sealers and measurement offices, and the Division of Measurement Standards and Energy Commission for coordination and funding identification.
Why It Matters
It shifts some pathways for compliance away from mandatory field verification toward optional factory auditing, imposes concrete near-term deadlines for county testing and statewide guidance, and centralizes registration and test protocols—changes that alter the compliance cost, timing, and enforcement landscape for EV charging infrastructure.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 314 adds an explicit definition of EVSE as a measuring instrument within California’s weights and measures laws and inserts manufacturer- and supplier-audit pathways into the state’s placed-in-service regime. The bill lets an EVSE that a manufacturer or supplier has audited or tested enter commercial use without further field testing during the remainder of the inspection period established by the secretary, but it cannot be used commercially until a sealer has applied a seal.
To prevent older installations from slipping through without inspection, the bill requires county sealers to ensure that any EVSE installed before January 1, 2026 and subject to the chapter be placed in service and tested by a sealer by January 1, 2027; the only additional cost to the EVSE owner or operator may be the standard registration fees. Counties must also register EVSE, post registration and testing information online, and may conduct sample testing and share metrological data with the Division of Measurement Standards.For noncompliance that does not affect meter accuracy, counties can tag devices and, at their discretion, provide conditional authorization to continue operating while operators correct issues; counties may seize a device if a removed tag is not properly addressed.
The Division of Measurement Standards must issue guidance and statewide, web-accessible resources (forms, testing protocols, payment methods, and placed-in-service templates) by January 1, 2027, and identify any existing funds that could purchase testing equipment for counties by June 1, 2026.Crucially, the bill directs the Division to develop and implement optional in-factory auditing or factory-registered service-agency certification pathways for EVSE compliance, considering risk-based assessments, cost and time savings, industry input, international practices, and extended field-inspection timelines. The law also temporarily exempts workplace and residential exclusive-use EVSE from most chapter requirements until January 1, 2028, preserving a field-inspection option for manufacturers but not mandating factory audits.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Manufacturer/supplier audit: An EVSE audited or tested by its manufacturer or supplier may be used commercially without further field testing for the remainder of the secretary’s inspection period, but only after a sealer has applied a seal.
County testing deadline: County sealers must ensure EVSE installed before Jan 1, 2026 are initially placed in service and tested by Jan 1, 2027, with no additional charge beyond registration fees to the owner or operator.
Temporary exemption: EVSE installed exclusively for workplace employee use or for residents in a dwelling are exempt from the chapter (except Section 12500.5) until Jan 1, 2028, temporarily narrowing enforcement scope.
State guidance and factory pathway: The Division of Measurement Standards must publish statewide forms, testing protocols, and online resources and develop optional in-factory auditing or factory-registered service-agency pathways by Jan 1, 2027.
County enforcement tools and data sharing: Counties may tag nonaccuracy-related violations, grant conditional authorization to operate while issues are corrected, seize devices for unresolved noncompliance, conduct sample metrological testing, and must post registration/testing information online.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and EVSE recognized as a measuring instrument
The bill amends the chapter’s definitions to add an explicit definition of EVSE as a device used in connection with the sale of electricity as a motor vehicle fuel that includes a measuring instrument. That designation brings EV charging equipment squarely within existing weights-and-measures rules and frames the rest of the bill: once an EVSE is a measuring instrument, registration, placed-in-service, testing, sealing, tagging, and seizure authorities apply as amended elsewhere in the chapter.
Placed-in-service: manufacturer testing exception (with sealing required)
The amendment creates a limited exception: if an odometer or an EVSE has been tested or audited by its manufacturer or supplier, it may be used commercially without a further test for the remainder of the secretary’s inspection period. The exception is conditional: the device still must be sealed by a sealer before commercial use. This provision opens an administrative route to market entry that relies on manufacturer documentation plus sealing rather than fresh field testing at every installation.
County sealer duties: registration, deadline, and funding search
This new section imposes a concrete duty on county sealers to test older EVSE installations: any unit installed before Jan 1, 2026 and subject to the chapter must be tested and placed in service by Jan 1, 2027, with no charge to owners beyond regular registration fees. It requires EVSE registration in the host county, directs the Division of Measurement Standards (in consultation with the Energy Commission) to identify available funding to buy testing equipment for counties by June 1, 2026, and authorizes counties to tag nonaccuracy-related violations and, at their discretion, allow conditional operation while corrections are made.
Exemptions, retest rule, registration, and conditional tags (temporary)
This section temporarily exempts EVSE installed for exclusive workplace or residential use from most chapter provisions (except the type-approval provision in Section 12500.5) until Jan 1, 2028. It also bars mandatory retesting or re-placing-in-service after maintenance if the maintenance does not affect the device’s correctness, clarifies that type-approved devices can be used commercially without placement in service during the secretary’s inspection period, and repeats the county tagging/conditional-authorization regime while preserving county authority to test in response to complaints. The exemption and other rules are explicitly time-limited to Jan 1, 2028.
State guidance, optional factory pathways, and county implementation requirements
The Division of Measurement Standards must publish statewide, web-accessible resources by Jan 1, 2027 (registration form, fee payment method, placed-in-service form, testing protocol, and test report template) and require counties enforcing the chapter to accept those statewide forms and protocols. The division must also develop and implement optional in-factory auditing or factory-registered service-agency certification pathways for compliance, considering risk-based assessments, cost/time savings, industry input, international best practices, and extended field-inspection timelines. Counties are required to adhere to the division’s testing and registration guidelines by a stated near-term deadline and may conduct sample testing and share results with the division to inform standards.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- EVSE manufacturers and suppliers — They gain an optional, faster route to market through manufacturer or supplier audits and potential factory-based certification, reducing initial field-testing burdens and speeding deployments.
- Site owners and operators (public chargers, employers, multifamily property owners) — The manufacturer-audit pathway and temporary exemptions for workplace/residential exclusive-use EVSE can lower upfront testing time and costs and reduce repeat retesting after maintenance that doesn't affect accuracy.
- Division of Measurement Standards and state agencies — The bill centralizes forms, protocols, and data flows, giving the Division better visibility and tools to standardize enforcement and to analyze aggregated metrological data from county sample testing.
Who Bears the Cost
- County sealers and local measurement offices — They must meet a tight testing timetable for older installations, post registration and testing materials online, conduct sample testing, and may need to acquire new testing equipment and staff time, even though the bill directs the division to look for funding rather than guaranteeing new state funds.
- EVSE owners and operators — They must register devices with counties and pay applicable administrative fees, and they may bear operational disruption or upgrade costs if a county tags a device or requires corrective action.
- Manufacturers opting into factory auditing — Firms that use the optional factory pathway will incur costs to design, document, and sustain factory audits or to work with factory-registered service agencies to produce verifiable evidence that devices meet state metrological requirements.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between speeding the deployment and commercial use of EV charging infrastructure (by accepting manufacturer audits and offering temporary exemptions) and preserving uniform, verifiable measurement accuracy and local enforcement (which requires field testing capacity, clear audit standards, and funds). The bill resolves this tension by offering optional factory pathways and county tools, but that balance depends heavily on implementation choices, funding availability, and the rigor of future state guidance.
SB 314 attempts to thread two competing objectives—speeding EVSE deployment and maintaining measurement integrity—by creating optional factory-based compliance alongside county enforcement tools. That approach raises several implementation questions.
First, the bill sets near-term deadlines (county testing by Jan 1, 2027; division guidance by Jan 1, 2027; funding identification by June 1, 2026; county adherence to protocols by June 30, 2026) that may be difficult for understaffed county sealers to meet without explicit funding or transitional support. The division’s obligation to "identify existing funding" does not guarantee new money, so counties may face equipment and personnel gaps while being given extra duties.
Second, reliance on manufacturer or supplier audits and optional factory pathways trades off field verification for documentation and factory processes. That trade-off can create evidentiary and trust issues: how will counties verifiably assess the sufficiency of factory audits, how will international or multi-jurisdictional equipment be reconciled with California’s standards, and what penalties or audit oversight apply to factory-registered service agencies?
The bill requires the division to consider risk-based assessments and international best practices but leaves many choices (acceptance criteria, audit frequency, and registrar functions) to future guidance.
Finally, several drafting and operational ambiguities deserve attention. The tagging/conditional-authorization language permits an operator to "remove the tag for at least 30 days while the EVSE is brought into compliance," a phrase that reads oddly and could be interpreted in ways that undermine county supervision or encourage temporary circumvention.
The coexistence of a temporary exemption for workplace/residential EVSE and a general push toward factory pathways risks creating uneven inspection coverage across sectors and a two-tier compliance environment.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.