SB 353 establishes an income tax credit tied to donations of agricultural products and certain processed foods to California food banks. The measure sets out who qualifies as a donor, what items count, and reporting and documentation requirements for donors and food banks.
The bill changes tax compliance and recordkeeping for affected producers and packers, creates annual reporting to the Legislature using food-bank certificates, and limits the program to a defined period. Compliance officers, tax teams for growers and processors, and food-bank operations should review both the valuation rules and certificate procedures.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill allows an income tax credit equal to 15% of the "qualified value" of eligible donated foods to California food banks. It defines eligible items and donors, prescribes a method for valuing donated goods, requires a certificate from the receiving food bank, and reduces any corresponding tax deduction by the credit amount.
Who It Affects
Primary targets are growers, harvesters, packers, and processors (but not retailers) who donate qualifying fresh or processed food items; California food banks that issue donation certificates; and the Franchise Tax Board, which collects documentation and must report utilization to the Legislature.
Why It Matters
The credit creates a taxable incentive to shift surplus or unsold agricultural product into food-bank distribution rather than disposal or sale. For tax and compliance teams this adds a valuation, documentation, and audit trail requirement; for food banks it creates a new role in certifying donations used for tax claims.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 353 lets certain agricultural actors claim a nonrefundable income tax credit equal to 15% of the qualified value of food they donate to California food banks. The credit applies only to a defined list of fresh produce, raw agricultural products, and specific processed foods, and only when donations occur under the Food and Agricultural Code chapter referenced in the statute.
The statute limits eligible donors to people responsible for planting, managing, harvesting, growing, raising, packing, or processing the donated items — explicitly excluding retailers whose primary business is selling to the public. To prevent arbitrary pricing, the bill requires donors to compute the "qualified value" using the donor's weighted average wholesale price for like-grade sales in the calendar month of the donation; if the donor had no such sales that month, the donor must use the nearest regional wholesale market price published by USDA Agricultural Marketing Service.When a donor makes a qualifying donation, the receiving food bank must issue a certificate that lists the donor, the type and quantity of items, the origin (where grown and/or processed), and, if provided by the donor, the qualified value.
Donors must retain that certificate and provide it to the Franchise Tax Board on request. The bill also requires that taxpayers claim the credit only on a timely filed original return and reduces any deduction for the donated cost by the amount of the credit claimed.The statute includes carryforward rules (unused credit may offset net tax in the following year and up to six additional years) and directs the Franchise Tax Board to file annual reports to the Legislature using certificate data (including value, county of origin, and donation month) through a specified date.
The law is time-limited: the credit is operative only for a prescribed period and the statute contains a later repeal date; the text also notes an earlier 2019 amendment that applies beginning in 2020.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The credit equals 15% of the "qualified value" of eligible donated items and applies only to donations made to California food banks under the cited Food and Agricultural Code chapter.
"Qualified value" is the donor's weighted average wholesale price for like‑grade sales in the calendar month of donation; if no such sales occurred, the donor uses the nearest USDA AMS regional wholesale market price for that month.
The statute limits eligible donors to growers, managers, harvesters, packers, and processors and explicitly excludes retailers whose principal business is retail sales to the public.
Donors must obtain a certificate from the food bank listing donor, item types and quantities, origins, and (if provided) qualified value; the Franchise Tax Board may request the certificate for verification.
The credit may only be claimed on a timely filed original return; excess credit may be carried forward to the next year and for six succeeding years; the law is time‑limited and includes specified operative and repeal dates.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Credit allowance and overall scope
This subsection sets the core entitlement: a credit against "net tax" equal to 15% of the qualified value of donations to covered California food banks. It also delimits the taxable years during which donations qualify. Practically, this creates the taxable incentive and defines the universe of claims the Franchise Tax Board will need to monitor.
List of eligible donation items
This paragraph enumerates eligible products: fresh fruits and vegetables, specified raw agricultural products (including meat, poultry, eggs, fish), and a tailored list of processed foods (rice, beans, canned/frozen/dried fruits and vegetables, certain dairy, infant formula, oils, soup, sauce, bread, pasta, canned meats/seafood). Compliance teams must map inventory lines to these statutory definitions and to cross-referenced code sections to determine eligibility.
Who qualifies as a donor
The statute defines "qualified taxpayer" principally as the person responsible for planting, managing, and harvesting a crop, and extends to those growing, raising, harvesting, packing, or processing donated items — but excludes retailers. That exclusion turns on a business's primary activity; taxpayers and tax advisers will need to document business function to resolve borderline cases (e.g., vertically integrated operations that sell both wholesale and retail).
How to calculate qualified value
This clause prescribes valuation: first choice is the donor's weighted average wholesale price for like‑grade sales in the same calendar month; fallback is the USDA AMS nearest regional wholesale market price for that product and month. The provision forces donors to maintain contemporaneous sales records or else rely on third‑party market data — both of which affect claim substantiation and audit risk.
Interaction with charitable deduction
When a donor claims the credit, the donor must reduce any otherwise allowable deduction under the Personal Income Tax Law by the amount of the credit. This prevents double tax benefit—one via a deduction and again via the credit—but also complicates tax bookkeeping because donors must track the same donation through both credit and deduction calculations.
Food-bank certificates and documentation
Food banks receiving donations must issue a certificate containing a signed statement that the donation was made under the specified Food and Agricultural Code chapter, the donated items' types and quantities, donor name(s), food‑bank name/address, and, if provided by the donor, qualified value and origins. The Franchise Tax Board can request these certificates; donors should adopt document workflows to capture and store certificates for audits.
Claim timing and carryover rules
The credit can be claimed only on a timely filed original return; amended returns cannot be used to claim it. If the credit exceeds net tax, an unused portion may be carried forward to the next year and for six succeeding years. These limits affect tax planning: missed timely reporting may be fatal to claims, and carryover rules dictate long‑term forecasting of tax positions.
Franchise Tax Board reporting to the Legislature
Using certificate data, the FTB must report annually to the Legislature on utilization of the credit, including qualified value, county of origin, and donation month. Reports run on a specific schedule until a stated date. From an administrative perspective this means the FTB will collect data useful for program evaluation — and that donors and food banks should expect their certificates to feed public reporting.
Effective windows and repeal
The text clarifies that a 2019 statutory amendment applies from a specified date and then limits the statute's operative period and sets a repeal date. Those temporal limits affect whether a given donation year is eligible and create a finite window for both claiming credits and for the FTB's reporting obligations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Growers and producers who would otherwise dispose of surplus: they can monetize donations through a tax credit tied to wholesale value, improving the after‑tax economics of donating unsold or surplus product.
- Processors and packers that qualify: processors that donate specified packaged foods gain the same tax incentive as primary producers, which can turn low‑margin product into a predictable tax benefit.
- Food banks and recipients: food banks receive additional supplies that might otherwise be wasted; the statute also standardizes certification, which helps food banks document inbound donations for program evaluation and potential resource planning.
- Tax advisers and accounting firms: demand for advisory and compliance services will rise because donors need help valuing donations, documenting origin, and complying with the "timely original return" requirement.
Who Bears the Cost
- Qualified taxpayers (growers, packers, processors): they bear recordkeeping and valuation burdens, must secure certificates, adjust deduction claims, and face audit exposure if valuations or origins are disputed.
- Franchise Tax Board and state administrators: FTB must process documentation, verify claims, and produce annual reports — an administrative cost that may require additional resources and creates a new audit workload.
- Food banks: they must adopt certificate issuance procedures and maintain provenance information, adding administrative tasks that may strain smaller organizations without additional support.
- Retailers excluded from eligibility: retailers that donate will not receive the credit, which could create competitive or fairness complaints and administrative fragmentation for vertically integrated firms that operate retail outlets alongside qualifying operations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals—maximizing food donations and preventing double tax benefits—by creating a targeted credit with valuation, documentation, and deduction adjustments; the central tension is between making the incentive generous enough to change producer behavior and keeping the program administrable and auditable without creating market distortions or excessive compliance costs.
The statute ties a tax incentive to a market price mechanism that can be difficult to administer. Using a donor's weighted average wholesale sales as the primary valuation lever reduces reliance on external indices but invites disputes where donors have limited or volatile sales in the donation month.
The fallback to USDA AMS regional prices is administrable but can diverge from local market realities, creating either overvaluation or undercompensation for donors.
Operationally, the certification and reporting chain places burdens on food banks and on the Franchise Tax Board. Food banks must issue and retain standardized certificates and collect origin information they may not currently gather; the FTB must reconcile certificate data with tax returns and produce annual legislative reports.
The statute's limitation to original returns and the carryforward window create sharp timing constraints (missed timely claims are difficult to cure), while the requirement to reduce charitable deductions by the credit amount shifts the effective tax benefit and complicates recordkeeping.
The donor eligibility rules exclude retailers but leave grey areas for vertically integrated operators and for custom‑processors. That ambiguity may generate disputes or inconsistent application.
Finally, the statute is time‑limited with separate operative and repeal dates and includes a prior amendment clause; tracking which donations fall in eligible years and how earlier amendments apply will be a necessary compliance task.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.