SB 750 would create the California Housing Finance and Credit Act (CAHFCA), a new state program administered by the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) that provides credit enhancements and insurance for construction and permanent loans used to build or preserve affordable multifamily and for-sale housing. The measure also creates the California Housing Finance and Credit Fund in the State Treasury, continuously appropriates the fund for program activity and administrative costs, and requires periodic agency and Legislative Analyst reporting on program performance.
The program is explicitly conditional on voter approval of a companion constitutional amendment and only becomes operational after that approval; if enacted it gives CalHFA broad powers to underwrite, insure, acquire loans, issue state‑guaranteed debentures, set premium charges, and invest fund assets. SB 750 aims to mobilize private capital into stalled projects but also creates an open contingent liability structure that the Administration and Legislature must manage through an annual budget authorization limit for new insurance commitments.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a CalHFA‑administered credit enhancement and loan‑insurance program for affordable construction and permanent loans and establishes a dedicated state fund to pay insurance claims and cover administrative expenses. CalHFA may insure or offer other credit enhancements, issue commitments, acquire defaulted loans, and have debentures issued in lieu of cash claim payments.
Who It Affects
CalHFA (as program administrator), affordable housing developers with regulatory agreements, banks and approved financial institutions that originate construction or permanent loans, and the State Treasurer (who issues and handles debentures). The General Fund is a backstop because debentures carry a state guaranty and the Treasurer must pay if the fund is unable to.
Why It Matters
It creates a large, flexible tool to lower financing costs and take projects out of stalled pipelines by reducing lender risk — a structural intervention in housing finance. At the same time, it centralizes underwriting and contingent liability management in one agency and changes how the state allocates budgetary and credit risk for housing production.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 750 sets up a new, optional CalHFA program to make it easier for lenders to finance affordable housing by reducing their risk. CalHFA may insure short‑term construction loans and long‑term permanent loans or provide other credit enhancements (for example loan guarantees or securitization support).
The program is financed through a dedicated state fund that collects premium charges and may invest idle balances; money in the fund is continuously appropriated to CalHFA for credit enhancements and administrative costs.
Eligibility is structured around existing affordable‑housing regulatory frameworks: projects must generally be receiving financing from, and be subject to recorded regulatory agreements with, CalHFA, the Tax Credit Allocation Committee, or the Department of Housing and Community Development, or have an equivalent recorded regulatory agreement for long affordability terms. The agency must set minimum loan eligibility rules (duration, amount, loan‑to‑value, security) and may rely on certifications from approved financial institutions to speed commitments.
The bill also requires prevailing wages on developments covered by the program and gives CalHFA discretion to decline or reinsure risks outside its capacity.If a loan insured under the program defaults and the lender forecloses or otherwise acquires the project, CalHFA can receive title and issue debentures to the lender equal to the outstanding value of the loan, or acquire the loan and pay approved institutions an amount equal to unpaid principal plus allowed costs. Debentures issued under the statute are state‑guaranteed, exempt from state and local taxation, and the Treasurer must pay holders from the General Fund if the program fund cannot.
CalHFA also has authorities to operate or dispose of acquired properties, pursue assigned claims, and set rules for termination of insurance contracts.Accountability provisions include an annual agency report and an annual agreed‑upon procedures engagement of the fund’s accounts by an independent CPA, plus a biannual Legislative Analyst’s Office effectiveness report with metrics such as debt capacity utilization and number of units served. The Governor must propose, in the annual budget, a limit on CalHFA’s authorization to insure new construction and expansion loans for the coming budget year; the bill prohibits the program from being subject to the State General Obligation Bond Law and contains severability language.
Finally, the statute does not become operative unless voters approve a specified constitutional amendment, and then begins on January 1, 2027 or the amendment’s effective date, whichever is later.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The program only becomes operative if voters approve the companion constitutional amendment, and then begins no earlier than January 1, 2027 (or the amendment’s effective date).
CalHFA must set a one‑time, nonrefundable premium for insured loans computed on the total amount of principal and interest payable over the loan term, and it may vary premiums by assessed risk but may not set a rate greater than 2%.
Eligibility for credit enhancements requires a project to have a recorded regulatory agreement with CalHFA, the Tax Credit Allocation Committee, or HCD (or an equivalent), with minimum affordability periods of at least 55 years for rental units and 45 years for ownership units.
When an insured loan defaults and property is conveyed, the Treasurer issues debentures equal to the loan’s outstanding value; those debentures carry an explicit State of California guaranty and the Treasurer must tap the General Fund to pay holders if the program fund cannot.
CalHFA may collect an advance premium (nonrefundable) of up to $6 per year for each $1,000 of proposed principal to cover underwriting and monitoring costs; that amount is credited against the final premium if insurance goes forward.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Creates CAHFCA and assigns CalHFA as administrator
These opening provisions name the new California Housing Finance and Credit Act, set its purpose to stimulate private capital into affordable housing, and define key terms such as “construction loan,” “credit enhancement,” and “debenture.” The operative clause assigns administration and implementation authority to CalHFA and explicitly allows the agency to write implementing guidelines and include homeownership‑focused criteria in notices of available enhancements—giving the agency flexibility in program design.
Agency powers to underwrite, reinsure, and charge premiums
CalHFA gains broad operational powers: entering into insurance contracts, reinsuring risks, making claim settlement rules, and declining risks that exceed fund capacity. The agency must establish a one‑time nonrefundable premium computed on principal plus interest over the loan term; while premiums can vary with risk, the statute caps the rate at 2%. The agency can also collect a modest advance premium (up to $6 per $1,000 per year) to offset underwriting and monitoring costs if commitments expire.
Annual financial attestation and biannual LAO effectiveness report
The bill requires CalHFA to produce an annual program condition report and to obtain an annual agreed‑upon procedures engagement of the fund’s books by an independent CPA, with both reports transmitted to the Governor and relevant legislative committees by November 1 each year. The Legislative Analyst’s Office must submit a report to the Legislature every other year evaluating program effectiveness and providing metrics (debt capacity used, number of beneficiaries, unit counts by income level), which creates periodic external performance assessment.
Eligibility standards, affordability terms, and wage rules
CalHFA must set minimum project and loan qualifications including maximum durations, amounts, LTV limits, and security requirements. Projects typically must be subject to recorded regulatory agreements with CalHFA, TCAC, or HCD (or equivalent). The bill requires long affordability covenants (55 years for rentals, 45 years for ownership) and imposes prevailing‑wage obligations on workers on covered developments, signaling an affordability and labor standards floor for insured projects.
Default mechanics, loan acquisition, and post‑acquisition powers
If a lender forecloses or acquires property after default, CalHFA can accept conveyance and then have the Treasurer issue debentures to the lender equal to the outstanding loan value; alternatively, CalHFA may acquire non‑first‑mortgage insured loans by paying approved institutions a fair amount. After acquisition, the agency steps into the lender’s shoes with powers to operate, lease, renovate, sell, or otherwise disposition properties and pursue assigned claims—exposing the fund to asset management responsibilities and potential operational burdens.
When insurance obligations end and voluntary terminations
Insurance obligations cease if lenders who foreclose fail to convey property to the agency after notice, or if borrowers repay loans in full with notice. The agency can also terminate contracts on joint lender/borrower request upon payment of an equitable termination charge, protecting the fund but also creating a process where private parties can exit coverage for a price.
Creates dedicated fund, investment powers, and annual insurance authorization limit
The California Housing Finance and Credit Fund is a continuously appropriated State Treasury fund for credit enhancements and administrative costs. CalHFA can direct the Treasurer to invest idle fund monies in eligible securities and interest‑bearing accounts. The Governor must propose an annual limit (in the Budget Bill) on CalHFA’s authorization to insure new construction/expansion loans; the bill also instructs that the limit should avoid creating “excessive risk” to state credit and interest rates, linking program scale to state fiscal policy.
Exemptions, severability, and conditional effective date
The act is explicitly not subject to certain government code requirements and contains severability language. Critically, the statute is operative only if a companion constitutional amendment is approved by voters; the operative date is January 1, 2027 or the amendment’s effective date, whichever is later—making voter approval a gating condition for the program to exist.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Housing across all five countries.
Explore Housing in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Affordable housing developers with regulatory agreements — The program lowers lender risk and can help move projects from predevelopment to construction by improving loan terms or providing insurance that lenders require.
- Banks and approved financial institutions — Credit enhancement reduces their expected losses and can increase appetite for longer or larger loans to affordable housing projects.
- Nonprofit homeownership developers — The statute explicitly accommodates homeownership units sold through nonprofits and supports long‑term affordability covenants, expanding financing options for shared‑equity and limited‑equity ownership models.
- Investors in debentures — Debentures issued under the program carry an explicit State guaranty and tax exemptions, creating a potentially attractive, state‑backed instrument for secondary market buyers.
Who Bears the Cost
- State General Fund / taxpayers — Debentures are unconditionally guaranteed by the state and the Treasurer must pay holders from the General Fund if the fund cannot, creating a potential contingent liability for the state.
- CalHFA — The agency takes on underwriting, monitoring, claim settlement, asset management, and reporting responsibilities that may require new staffing and operational capacity; administrative expenses come from the new fund but operational strain is real.
- Lenders and borrowers using the program — Borrowers pay nonrefundable premiums (including advance premiums) and must meet long affordability covenants and prevailing‑wage requirements, which can increase upfront costs and project complexity.
- Smaller developers or projects without long regulatory agreements — Projects that cannot meet the 55‑year/45‑year affordability terms or other eligibility rules will be excluded from program benefits, potentially concentrating advantages among developers already operating inside existing subsidy systems.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill trades off two legitimate goals: accelerating affordable housing production by reducing lender risk versus protecting taxpayers from an open‑ended contingent liability. Lowering premiums and loosening underwriting helps projects get built today but increases the chance the state must cover losses tomorrow; tightening pricing and eligibility protects the fund but undermines the program’s capacity to clear stalled projects.
SB 750 is a targeted tool to shift credit risk away from private lenders, but it simultaneously creates a state‑backed credit facility whose downside is borne by the public. The statute limits premium rates to 2% but gives CalHFA discretion to set lower rates and to retain modest advance fees; if the agency prices too low relative to realized losses the fund could deplete and trigger General Fund payments under the debenture guaranty.
Conversely, pricing too high undermines the purpose of attracting capital to stalled projects. The bill does not appropriate startup capital for the fund; it relies on premium inflows and retained revenues, leaving timing and scale questions for initial program activity.
Governance and oversight are deliberately constrained: the fund’s expenditures are continuously appropriated to CalHFA and largely exempted from supervisory provisions that apply to other state funds. While the bill imposes annual financial attestations and biannual LAO effectiveness reviews, operational discretion remains concentrated at CalHFA.
That structure speeds decision‑making but raises implementation questions about underwriting standards, conflict‑of‑interest safeguards, collateral and asset management capacity, and how the agency will coordinate with other existing affordable housing financing programs to avoid duplication or perverse incentives. The prevailing‑wage requirement and long affordability terms raise project costs and could shift the subsidy mix needed to make projects feasible, complicating underwriting assumptions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.