This bill establishes an Aging and Disability Resource Connection (ADRC) program under the California Department of Aging (CDA), working with the Department of Rehabilitation and the State Department of Health Care Services, to help older adults, caregivers, and people with disabilities access long‑term services and supports (LTSS) at the local level. ADRC programs must be operated jointly by area agencies on aging and independent living centers and deliver enhanced information/referral, options counseling, short‑term service coordination, hospital and skilled‑nursing transitions, and disaster and emergency preparedness training tailored to vulnerable populations.
The measure also directs CDA to develop a core best‑practices model (including person‑centered counseling, formal follow‑up, data‑sharing and reporting models, and outreach coordination) and to incorporate lessons from an ADRC Infrastructure Grants Program. Implementation is explicitly subject to an appropriation in the annual Budget Act, creating a funding gate for rollout and enforcement.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a statewide ADRC program administered by the California Department of Aging and staffed locally by joint partnerships of area agencies on aging and independent living centers. It prescribes core services — from options counseling to disaster preparedness training — and requires CDA to issue a best‑practices model for local programs.
Who It Affects
Area agencies on aging and independent living centers (as designated ADRC operators), the California Department of Aging, the Department of Rehabilitation, DHCS, hospitals and skilled nursing facilities that coordinate transitions, and older adults, people with disabilities, and their caregivers seeking LTSS and emergency‑preparedness resources.
Why It Matters
The bill centralizes local access to LTSS and explicitly connects disability/aging services with emergency preparedness, standardizing service expectations and data reporting while leaving implementation dependent on state budget approval.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill sets up a new ADRC program intended to be the local entry point for long‑term services and supports for older adults and people with disabilities. The California Department of Aging will run the program statewide and must help qualified area agencies on aging and independent living centers apply to be designated as local ADRC operators.
Those local partnerships are intended to be the front line: they answer questions, counsel on options, coordinate short‑term services, and help people move from hospitals or skilled nursing facilities back into the community.
A notable, explicit addition is disaster and emergency preparedness training targeted to older adults and people with disabilities. The training must use existing materials and tools from the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, CDA, the Department of Rehabilitation, and community partners, and should make people aware of local alert systems, emergency plans, evacuation and transportation options, fire department guidance, and utility‑related information during emergencies.
The bill therefore ties long‑term care access work directly to disaster resilience and local emergency planning.CDA must also produce a core best‑practices model in consultation with an ADRC advisory committee and implement it by the statutory date. That model must include a person‑centered counseling approach, outreach and formal referral coordination with health and veteran systems and community providers, a formal follow‑up procedure to verify that referrals resulted in services, and templates for sharing client data and reporting metrics (including demographic data and counts by service category).
CDA is directed to review an ADRC Infrastructure Grants Program to inform that model.Finally, the statute imposes two practical limits. First, ADRC establishment and operation are conditioned on an appropriation in the State Budget, so the program’s launch and ongoing funding turn on legislative budget decisions.
Second, ADRC programs are required to operate within their geographic service area and to inform the public about their services, creating obligations for local outreach and delineated service boundaries.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill establishes the Aging and Disability Resource Connection (ADRC) program and makes the California Department of Aging the lead administrator, in collaboration with the Department of Rehabilitation and DHCS.
Local ADRC programs must be operated jointly by an area agency on aging and an independent living center and must provide options counseling, short‑term service coordination, and transitions from hospitals and skilled nursing facilities.
ADRCs must deliver disaster and emergency preparedness training tailored to older adults and people with disabilities, using existing tools from OES, CDA, DOR and community partners and covering local alerts, evacuation, transportation, and utility issues.
CDA must develop and implement a core best‑practices model (including person‑centered counseling, formal follow‑up, data‑sharing models, and specific reporting metrics) and to consider results from the ADRC Infrastructure Grants Program when doing so.
Implementation of the statute is expressly contingent on an appropriation in the annual Budget Act (or another act), meaning the program has no automatic funding or mandate until appropriated.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Creates the ADRC program and its purpose
This subsection formally creates the Aging and Disability Resource Connection to provide consumers and families with information about LTSS and to assist in accessing services locally. That language fixes the ADRC’s purpose as both an information hub and an access point for long‑term care navigation, which establishes statutory expectations for scope and function at the local level.
State administration and interagency collaboration
The California Department of Aging is named as the administrator and must work in collaboration with the Department of Rehabilitation and the State Department of Health Care Services. This creates a cross‑agency governance expectation: CDA holds primary administrative responsibility but must coordinate program design and operations with agencies that oversee vocational rehabilitation and Medicaid‑related services, which affects eligibility alignment and referral pathways.
Local operators and designation process
Area agencies on aging and independent living centers are designated as the core local partners and must operate ADRC programs jointly. CDA must assist interested, qualified partners in completing designation applications. Practically, this channels program delivery through existing aging/disability infrastructure but requires CDA support to onboard local operators, which raises questions about technical assistance and one‑time start‑up capacity.
Required services, including disaster preparedness training
The statute lists minimum service requirements: enhanced information and referral, options counseling, short‑term coordination, and transition services from hospitals and skilled nursing facilities. It adds a specific mandate for disaster and emergency preparedness training for older adults and people with disabilities, requiring use of existing emergency tools and explicit topics (local alert systems, emergency plans, local fire department guidance, emergency transportation/evacuation, and utility service information). This ties ADRC client work directly into local emergency planning and outreach.
Geographic scope and public notice obligations
Local ADRC programs must provide services within their designated geographic area and must proactively provide public information about the services they offer. This clause creates an obligation to define service boundaries and to conduct outreach, which matters for service coordination across neighboring jurisdictions and for clarity on where individuals should seek help.
Best‑practices model, reporting, and grant review
CDA, with its ADRC Advisory Committee, must develop a core model of ADRC best practices and implement it (the bill sets an implementation date). The model must include person‑centered counseling, outreach and coordination with specific referral sources (including VA medical centers, 211, PACE, and others), a formal follow‑up procedure, data‑sharing templates, and reporting metrics (demographics, counts by service category, caregivers served). The department must also review the ADRC Infrastructure Grants Program (Section 9121) to inform the model. These requirements create standardized expectations for program operations and data collection but also impose reporting and interoperability tasks on local partners.
Funding contingency
The statute makes implementation contingent on an appropriation in the annual Budget Act or another act. That conditionality means the legal framework exists, but CDA and local partners do not receive an enforceable funding stream or automatic rollout until the Legislature provides money.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Social Services across all five countries.
Explore Social Services in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Older adults with LTSS needs — they gain a local, coordinated entry point for information, counseling, and help transitioning from institutional settings back to the community, plus targeted emergency‑preparedness training.
- People with disabilities — ADRC programs are designed to be disability‑accessible and provide preparedness training and referrals tailored to mobility, communication, and medical needs.
- Family caregivers — the bill requires ADRCs to provide caregiver information and support (including counts of caregivers served), improving navigation and follow‑up for families arranging care.
- Local emergency managers and community partners — having a named, trained ADRC partner improves outreach to vulnerable populations during planning and disasters, making communication and evacuation efforts more targeted.
- Area agencies on aging and independent living centers — they receive statutory recognition as the designated local operators, which can strengthen their role and eligibility for future grants or technical assistance.
Who Bears the Cost
- California Department of Aging — CDA must staff program administration, develop the best‑practices model, run the advisory process, assist applicants, and build reporting systems; those tasks require budgeted resources.
- Area agencies on aging and independent living centers — joint operation requirements, new training duties, data collection and reporting, and outreach obligations will increase operational workload and program costs at the local level.
- Department of Rehabilitation and DHCS — both agencies must collaborate on implementation and may need to adapt eligibility pathways or data exchanges, adding coordination and technical burdens.
- Local emergency response agencies and first responders — they will need to coordinate with ADRCs for training and outreach, potentially stretching limited staff time during planning cycles and emergencies.
- State budget (Legislature) — because implementation requires appropriation, the program will compete with other priorities and could require ongoing General Fund support or one‑time grant dollars.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between standardizing local access to LTSS and emergency preparedness for vulnerable Californians and imposing new, potentially unfunded administrative and technical burdens on state and local providers: improving coordination and protections requires resources, data systems, and interagency work that the bill acknowledges but does not fund.
Two practical implementation frictions jump out. First, the statute ties launch and operation to an appropriation, so the law creates expectations without committing funds; local agencies may be required to prepare applications, training materials, and reporting templates while lacking stable financing.
Second, the bill mandates models for data sharing and specific reporting metrics but does not address privacy or interoperability mechanics. Local ADRCs will need to reconcile HIPAA and California Medical Information Act constraints, establish data‑use agreements, and likely invest in secure case‑management systems — requirements that carry cost and legal complexity.
There are also governance and scope choices left unresolved. The statute narrowly specifies that ADRCs are joint operations of area agencies on aging and independent living centers, which streamlines responsibility but could exclude other capable community organizations; the law does not set criteria for how CDA evaluates alternative operational structures.
The best‑practices model has a set implementation date in the text, but that date is in the past, and the statute does not explain how CDA should handle phased rollouts, pilot sites, or alignment with existing emergency management plans. Finally, while disaster preparedness training must use 'existing tools,' the bill leaves adaptation to local contexts to program operators — creating variability in quality and reach unless CDA issues clear minimum standards and funds necessary adaptations.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.