SB 878 converts existing prompt‑payment regulations for fire insurance into statute and attaches statutory damages and a public reporting regime. For claims arising on or after January 1, 2027, the bill requires insurers to acknowledge notice, begin investigation, accept or deny claims within set deadlines, and tender payment within 30 days of acceptance; failure to meet the deadlines exposes insurers to 20% annual interest on the accepted amount plus reasonable attorney’s fees.
The bill also requires every insurer that offers or sells fire insurance in California to file quarterly prompt‑payment compliance reports with the Department of Insurance beginning January 2028, with each report comparing the same quarter from the prior year. A corporate officer must sign each filing under penalty of perjury; knowingly false reports carry an administrative penalty (up to $1,500) and potential criminal exposure.
The Department must publish a quarterly, insurer‑specific compliance dashboard beginning July 1, 2028.
At a Glance
What It Does
SB 878 sets concrete claim‑handling deadlines (acknowledgement within 15 days, accept/deny within 40 days of proof, payment within 30 days of acceptance), makes late performance subject to 20% per annum damages plus attorney’s fees, and requires insurers to file quarterly compliance reports with the Department of Insurance.
Who It Affects
The bill applies to any insurer that offers or sells fire insurance in California and affects claims adjusters, in‑house compliance and legal teams, insured homeowners and businesses with fire coverage, and the Department of Insurance (which must collect and publish the data).
Why It Matters
By codifying timelines and attaching statutory monetary remedies, the bill shifts compliance risk from discretionary regulation to statute, increasing potential liability exposure for insurers and creating public transparency that can influence market behavior and regulator oversight.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 878 turns prompt‑payment rules for fire claims into statute and couples them with both private remedies and public accountability. The bill differentiates among three trigger points: notice of claim, proof of claim, and acceptance of the claim.
On notice, insurers must acknowledge receipt, provide forms and assistance, and begin an investigation within 15 calendar days unless payment is already made. After the insurer receives proof of claim, it has 40 calendar days to accept or deny the claim in whole or in part; if it needs more time it must explain the delay in writing within that 40‑day window and then provide written updates every 30 days.
If an insurer accepts a claim, it must tender payment or otherwise perform its obligation within 30 calendar days of acceptance. The bill imposes a bright‑line rule: any amount the insurer does not explicitly identify as accepted, denied, or undetermined is deemed accepted, and late payment interest begins to accrue.
When an insurer misses the accept/deny or payment deadlines, SB 878 makes the insurer liable for interest on the accepted amount at a 20% annual rate as damages and for reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees; the statute preserves any separate award of prejudgment interest allowed by law.On the transparency side, SB 878 requires quarterly reporting to the Department of Insurance starting in January 2028. Each report must include counts of claims received, counts of claims handled inside and outside the statutory deadlines, dates and days‑late for late handling, total dollars of late payments, and total dollars of interest paid, and must present the same quarter from the prior year for comparison.
A corporate officer must sign the report under penalty of perjury; knowingly false submissions expose the officer to an administrative penalty (up to $1,500) and potential criminal liability. The Department must compile these filings and publish an insurer‑by‑insurer compliance report on its website beginning July 1, 2028 and then every three months thereafter.
The commissioner retains authority to adopt regulations that shorten the statutory timelines.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Insurers must acknowledge notice and begin investigation within 15 calendar days of notice of a fire claim (unless payment is made within that window).
After proof of claim, insurers have 40 calendar days to accept or deny a fire claim, with required written updates every 30 days if more time is needed.
If an insurer accepts a claim it must tender payment or otherwise perform within 30 calendar days of acceptance; missing the accept/deny or payment deadlines exposes the insurer to 20% per annum interest on the accepted amount plus reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees.
Quarterly reporting to the Department of Insurance begins January 2028 and must include per‑insurer counts of timely and untimely claims, dates handled, days late, total late payment dollars, interest paid, and a same‑quarter prior‑year comparison; the Department publishes the first public report by July 1, 2028.
A corporate officer must sign each quarterly report under penalty of perjury; knowingly submitting false data can trigger an administrative penalty of up to $1,500 and potential criminal perjury exposure.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Scope and statutory placement of prompt‑payment rules
The bill creates Article 15.6 in Chapter 1 (Part 2, Division 1) of the Insurance Code to capture fire‑insurance prompt‑payment obligations. Placing these rules in the Code moves deadlines and remedies from administrative regulation into statute, which changes enforcement channels and injunctive posture and makes the timelines binding absent a change in law. The article explicitly applies only to claims arising on or after January 1, 2027.
Quarterly reporting requirements and certification
Section 1078 prescribes the quarterly reporting fields insurers must supply to the Department: total claims received; counts of claims handled in and out of compliance; dates and days late for noncompliant claims; total dollars of late payments; and total interest paid under the statute. Each quarterly submission must include the same quarter from the prior year for comparison. A corporate officer must sign the filing under penalty of perjury and certify its accuracy; the commissioner may assess an administrative penalty of up to $1,500 for knowingly false reports. The Department must compile insurer‑specific data and publish a quarterly, internet‑accessible report starting July 1, 2028.
Timelines and operational obligations on insurers
This section breaks down the insurer’s operational duties. On receipt of notice (unless payment is already made), the insurer must acknowledge receipt, provide forms and reasonable assistance, and begin investigation within 15 days. Upon receiving proof of claim the insurer has 40 days to accept or deny; if it needs more time it must notify the claimant in writing within 40 days and then every 30 days thereafter until a determination. If accepted, payment or other performance is due within 30 days. The provision requires written documentation to the claimant that identifies accepted, denied, and undetermined amounts and creates a timing‑triggered flow that will force insurers to either move quickly or document repeated delay.
Remedies, exceptions, and regulatory authority
If an insurer fails to comply with the accept/deny or payment deadlines the bill makes the insurer liable for statutory damages equal to 20% per annum on the accepted amount plus reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees; prejudgment interest remains available where law permits. The statute provides that any amount not labeled as accepted, denied, or undetermined is deemed accepted, creating an important default. It also preserves the existing fair claims settlement regulations and authorizes the commissioner to promulgate regulations that shorten the statutory timelines.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Insured homeowners and small businesses with fire coverage — they gain faster, enforceable timelines for claim processing and a statutory remedy (20% interest plus attorney’s fees) when insurers miss deadlines, improving leverage during disputes.
- Consumer and advocacy organizations — public, insurer‑specific compliance data creates a new transparency tool for monitoring insurer behavior and pressuring improvements.
- Department of Insurance and regulators — the reporting framework supplies structured, comparable data to inform oversight, targeted examinations, and potential rulemaking.
Who Bears the Cost
- Insurers writing fire coverage in California — they face stricter operational deadlines, potential 20% interest damages, attorney’s fee exposure, and ongoing reporting and certification obligations that raise compliance costs and reserve uncertainty.
- Corporate officers and compliance executives — required to sign reports under penalty of perjury, exposing them to personal legal risk and an administrative fine (up to $1,500) for knowing misstatements.
- Smaller or specialized insurers and third‑party adjusters — these entities may face disproportionate administrative burdens and operational strain to meet tight timelines and produce quarterly, audited data, potentially affecting pricing or market participation.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits faster, more certain consumer payouts and public accountability against insurer incentives to investigate carefully and manage solvency: strict statutory deadlines plus a high, automatic damage rate shift risk onto insurers, which can improve claimant outcomes but also raise costs, administrative burden, and potential market withdrawal—there is no simple rule that achieves both speedy payments and costless, reliable underwriting.
The bill creates several implementation and policy frictions that regulators and the market will need to manage. A 20% annual statutory interest rate is materially higher than typical post‑judgment or contract interest rates; it strongly incentivizes insurers to pay quickly but also increases the cost of missteps and may pressure insurers to issue prompt, precautionary payments rather than fully verify complex losses.
The statute’s deemed‑acceptance rule (amounts not specifically categorized are treated as accepted) magnifies that incentive, potentially encouraging conservative overpayments or defensive claim denials accompanied by rapid payments in narrow amounts to avoid exposure.
The quarterly public reporting requirement improves transparency but raises data‑quality and privacy questions. The bill requires insurer‑specific displays of late‑payment dollars and interest paid; insurers may challenge the comparability of data across claim types or the public disclosure of metrics tied to individual policies (which could implicate claimant privacy).
The administrative penalty for false reporting (up to $1,500) sits uneasily beside perjury exposure: it may be insufficient to deter careless reporting but the criminal overlay raises compliance anxiety for corporate officers. Finally, the measure leaves several operational questions open: how to calculate the ‘‘amount accepted’’ for partial acceptances, how complex/large losses where investigations require third‑party engineering are to be treated within the timelines, and how the statutory remedies interact with contractual policy terms and reinsurance arrangements.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.