SCR 109 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that declares January 2026 as National Mentorship Month and formally recognizes the contributions of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central California (BBBSofCC). The text congratulates the organization for its long‑running mentorship programs and community partnerships.
The resolution is symbolic: it does not appropriate funds, alter program rules, or impose duties on state agencies. Its practical value lies in public recognition that nonprofits and funders can cite as part of outreach, volunteer recruitment, and local advocacy.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution issues a formal legislative proclamation recognizing National Mentorship Month and naming BBBSofCC for its service. It uses Whereas clauses to summarize the organization's history and accomplishments and Resolved clauses to make the proclamation and recognition official.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties are BBBSofCC, the volunteers and mentees it serves, and local school districts that partner with the organization's programs. Indirectly it touches potential funders, community partners, and other nonprofits who track legislative recognition as a signaling tool.
Why It Matters
Although nonbinding and without fiscal effect, the resolution provides a public endorsement that nonprofits can leverage for visibility, donor outreach, and volunteer recruitment. For policy and program professionals, it signals legislative interest in mentorship as a topic worthy of attention and potential future policy work.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SCR 109 contains two standard elements: a set of Whereas clauses that describe the background and impact of the organization being honored, followed by Resolved clauses that issue the proclamation. The Whereas language cites BBBSofCC’s founding year (1968), cumulative reach (more than 10,000 children and families), and an ongoing High School Bigs Program operating across 21 unified school districts and serving over 4,000 youth annually.
The Resolved language formally proclaims January 2026 as National Mentorship Month and recognizes BBBSofCC’s contributions throughout central California.
Because this is a concurrent resolution, it is a nonbinding statement of legislative sentiment; it neither creates statutory requirements nor authorizes state expenditures. The bill’s filing notation indicates it was submitted to the Secretary of State for the legislative record, which is customary for chaptered resolutions and preserves the text for public reference and organizational use.Practically speaking, this kind of text functions as a tool for a nonprofit’s communications and development teams: it provides an official endorsement organizations can cite in press material, grant applications, annual reports, and volunteer recruitment.
It also gives local partners—schools, businesses, and philanthropic groups—a succinct legislative recognition they can point to when justifying partnerships or local investments in mentorship programming.From a policy perspective, the resolution highlights mentorship as an area of legislative interest but stops short of proposing programmatic changes, funding, or accountability measures. That leaves open two paths: stakeholders may use the public attention to push for concrete policy or funding proposals later, or the recognition may remain purely ceremonial with limited downstream impact beyond publicity.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution proclaims January 2026 as National Mentorship Month and formally recognizes Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central California.
The Whereas clauses state BBBSofCC was founded in 1968 and claim the organization has served more than 10,000 children and families.
The text highlights BBBSofCC’s High School Bigs Program, which the resolution says operates across 21 unified school districts and serves more than 4,000 youth annually.
SCR 109 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution—a legislative pronouncement that is nonbinding, does not change law, and carries no appropriation.
The filed document becomes part of the official legislative record and can be used by BBBSofCC and partners for publicity, fundraising, and partnership outreach, but it creates no new state obligations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Background and accomplishments the Legislature cites
This section collects the factual assertions the Legislature relied on to justify the proclamation: national recognition of mentoring, BBBSofCC’s founding date, cumulative service numbers, and the reach of its High School Bigs Program. For practitioners, these clauses are useful because they memorialize the specific claims the Legislature endorsed—figures and program names that the nonprofit can reference in external materials. The practical implication is reputational: the Legislature selects which metrics to highlight, which shapes the public narrative.
Proclamation of National Mentorship Month
This clause performs the core act: it proclaims January 2026 as National Mentorship Month. Legally, proclamations in concurrent resolutions express the Legislature’s sentiment; they do not bind executive branch agencies or require appropriation. Operationally, the proclamation creates a dated, official marker that can be used in communications and local observances.
Formal recognition of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central California
This clause recognizes BBBSofCC for its service and impact in central California. It functions as an official endorsement the organization can cite. The clause does not create oversight, reporting requirements, or programmatic obligations—there is no mandate for the state to monitor or support BBBSofCC beyond the statement of recognition.
Recordkeeping and public notice
The resolution is filed with the Secretary of State and assigned a chapter designation. That step preserves the text in the state’s public records, making it citable for grant applications, press releases, and historical reference. For records managers and nonprofit communications staff, the chaptered resolution is the durable artifact used to demonstrate legislative recognition.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Social Services across all five countries.
Explore Social Services in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central California — receives an official legislative endorsement that can be used to increase visibility, support fundraising pitches, and bolster volunteer recruitment.
- Current and prospective mentees and families — may gain indirect benefits through heightened community attention, increased volunteer interest, and potential local partnerships triggered by the recognition.
- Local school districts participating in the High School Bigs Program — gain public affirmation of their partnership, which can support internal advocacy for continued program collaboration and resource allocation.
- Private donors and philanthropic partners — obtain a legislative signal that can lower informational barriers when deciding whether to fund mentorship initiatives in the region.
Who Bears the Cost
- California Legislature and Secretary of State — incur minimal administrative costs for drafting, processing, and filing the resolution; these are routine and absorbed within existing operations.
- Other local nonprofits — may face increased competition for attention and donor dollars if legislative recognition concentrates visibility on a single organization.
- Local school and district staff — could experience modest additional outreach or partnership requests as community actors respond to the publicity, requiring staff time to manage relationships.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is symbolic recognition versus concrete support: the Legislature can boost visibility through proclamations without committing resources, but visibility alone does not address funding gaps, capacity constraints, or demands for accountability; converting acclaim into sustained services requires separate, often politically difficult, policy choices.
The resolution’s principal limitation is its symbolic nature. It endorses claims about BBBSofCC’s history and reach without establishing verification, reporting, or oversight mechanisms.
That creates a tension between the persuasive power of legislative recognition and the absence of accountability: stakeholders will need to look to the nonprofit’s audited reports and independent evaluations to substantiate the figures cited.
Another practical trade‑off is resource concentration. A high‑profile legislative endorsement can amplify an organization’s ability to attract funding and partners, but it can also distort local landscapes by privileging organizations that secure political recognition over equally effective but less visible programs.
Finally, because the resolution does not authorize funding, any sustained expansion of mentorship services will require separate policy action—appropriations, statutory program design, or new grants—if the Legislature wants to translate symbolic support into material investment.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.