SCR 113 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that proclaims September 27, 2026, as Gold Star Mothers’ and Families’ Day in California and directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution. The text consists largely of historical WHEREAS clauses recounting the origin of the Gold Star tradition and affirming the State’s desire to recognize families who lost service members.
The measure is purely ceremonial: it does not create enforceable rights, establish programs, authorize spending, or change statutory obligations. For stakeholders—veterans groups, local governments and organizers planning memorial events—the resolution functions as a formal recognition and a communications tool rather than a policy instrument.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill declares September 27, 2026, as Gold Star Mothers’ and Families’ Day in California by joint resolution of the Legislature and instructs the Secretary of the Senate to deliver copies to the author for distribution. It includes a series of WHEREAS clauses explaining the historical basis for the observance and cites casualty figures from the War on Terror.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties are ceremonial: Gold Star families, veterans service organizations, and state and local officials who organize commemorative events will use the proclamation for outreach and recognition. No state agencies receive new mandates and no regulated entities face compliance obligations.
Why It Matters
Although symbolic, the resolution matters to organizations that coordinate memorial activities because it provides an official state endorsement they can cite in publicity and grant applications. It also raises a notable technical point: the Legislature sets a fixed calendar date rather than adopting the longstanding federal practice of observing Gold Star Mothers’ Day on the last Sunday of September.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SCR 113 is a short, ceremonial joint resolution from the California Legislature. It opens with a set of WHEREAS clauses that summarize the Gold Star tradition, note the federal practice of designating the last Sunday in September as Gold Star Mothers’ and Families’ Day, and reference wartime casualty figures.
The operative language has two parts: a proclamation naming September 27, 2026, as Gold Star Mothers’ and Families’ Day in California, and a ministerial instruction that the Secretary of the Senate send copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
Legally, concurrent resolutions like this one express the Legislature’s sentiment but do not create statutory rights, trigger state funding, or bind executive-branch agencies. The resolution carries no enforcement mechanism, no appropriation, and no regulatory effect; it does not amend the Government Code or other law.
Practically, the text is a tool: veterans groups, local governments, and families can cite the resolution to promote events, encourage participation, and document official recognition.Two technical features are worth noting. First, the resolution fixes a single calendar date—September 27, 2026—rather than tying the observance to the 'last Sunday in September' cited in federal proclamations; that choice affects scheduling for organizations that normally align with the federal day.
Second, the resolution contains no implementation instructions, no designated lead agency, and no authorization for state spending, which means any events or services tied to the day will depend on existing programs, private organizations, or local government initiatives rather than new state support.
The Five Things You Need to Know
SCR 113 is a concurrent resolution (not a statute) that proclaims September 27, 2026, as Gold Star Mothers’ and Families’ Day in California.
The resolution contains historical WHEREAS clauses and cites more than 7,000 U.S. military deaths since the start of the War on Terror as context for the proclamation.
It creates no new legal obligations, appropriations, or agency duties—there is no enforcement mechanism or funding attached.
Unlike the federal practice of observing Gold Star Mothers’ Day on the last Sunday in September, this measure fixes a calendar date (Sept. 27, 2026), which may diverge from federal and local observances.
The only administrative instruction is procedural: the Secretary of the Senate must transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Historical context and rationale
The WHEREAS clauses summarize the origin of the Gold Star tradition, reference the custom of service flags, note the formation of Gold Star organizations, and cite federal observances and casualty figures. These clauses provide the Legislature’s justification for recognition and supply talking points for advocacy and outreach, but they have no independent legal effect; they merely explain the policy preference behind the proclamation.
Declaration of Gold Star Mothers’ and Families’ Day
This operative clause declares September 27, 2026, as Gold Star Mothers’ and Families’ Day in California. Because the instrument is a concurrent resolution, the declaration expresses legislative sentiment rather than creating binding law. The fixed-date approach is a deliberate drafting choice that determines scheduling for commemorations within the state and may cause alignment issues with organizations that follow the federal 'last Sunday' observance.
Distribution of the resolution
The resolution instructs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies to the author for appropriate distribution. This is a ministerial step that facilitates outreach: copies are typically sent to veterans groups, local governments, or the author’s office for public distribution. The clause does not require the Secretary to notify any state agencies or allocate resources for events.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Gold Star families in California — they receive formal statewide recognition which can validate their loss publicly and increase visibility for memorial events and aid organizations.
- Veterans service organizations and Gold Star chapters — the proclamation provides an official endorsement they can use in publicity, fundraising, and to justify commemorative programming.
- Local governments and event organizers — municipalities and nonprofits can cite the resolution when planning ceremonies, securing venues, or applying for private grants to support observances.
Who Bears the Cost
- Legislative staff and the Secretary of the Senate — minor administrative work to process, copy, and distribute the resolution without additional funding.
- Local governments and nonprofits that choose to hold observances — any event costs (logistics, security, staffing) remain the responsibility of those organizers because the resolution provides no funding.
- Families and advocates seeking material support — the symbolic recognition may be conflated with policy action, but the resolution imposes no new services or benefits for Gold Star families.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances symbolic recognition against substantive action: it allows the Legislature to honor Gold Star families without committing state resources or new programs, but that choice preserves fiscal neutrality at the cost of leaving real needs—grief support, financial assistance, and long-term services—unaddressed.
The central implementation challenge is the gap between symbolic recognition and material support. SCR 113 signals legislative gratitude but offers no pathway to additional services, counseling, financial assistance, or statutory benefits for surviving family members.
That gap creates a risk that public attention generated by the proclamation does not translate into concrete support unless separate legislation or appropriations follow.
The decision to fix a single calendar date — September 27, 2026 — rather than adopting the federal 'last Sunday in September' introduces practical friction. Organizations that plan around the federal observance will need to decide whether to hold separate events or align with one observance, possibly diluting turnout or complicating memorial scheduling.
Finally, the resolution leaves logistics entirely to existing actors: there is no designated state lead, no reporting requirement, and no guidance on how localities should commemorate the day, which could produce uneven recognition across California.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.