SCR 46 is a Senate concurrent resolution that proclaims April 24, 2025, as California Holocaust Memorial Day and urges Californians to observe a day of remembrance for victims of the Holocaust. The measure is symbolic — it does not create new law or funding — but it packages commemoration, education, and a statement of state values into a single legislative act.
The resolution frames the proclamation against a backdrop of increasing antisemitism, explicitly referencing a rise in antisemitic incidents since October 7, 2023, and connects the state-level observance to federal Days of Remembrance and Yom HaShoah. For practitioners, the resolution matters mainly as public policy signaling: it authorizes and encourages commemoration activities by schools, community organizations, and state actors without imposing mandates or appropriations.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Legislature adopted a concurrent resolution that proclaims April 24, 2025, as California Holocaust Memorial Day, urges residents to observe the day in an appropriate manner, and directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies of the resolution to the author. The text is declaratory and carries no regulatory penalties or funding commands.
Who It Affects
The resolution directly references schools, educators, Holocaust memorial organizations, Jewish communities, and state legislative offices as the primary audiences for its exhortations. Practically, local governments and community institutions that organize remembrance events will be the most immediately engaged stakeholders.
Why It Matters
Although symbolic, the resolution signals the State’s stance on antisemitism and pushes public education about the Holocaust, which can influence school programming and civic programming decisions. It also aligns California’s posture with federal Days of Remembrance, giving community organizations a clearer basis for planning commemorative activities in 2025.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SCR 46 opens with a series of "whereas" clauses that summarize the Holocaust: it states the historical facts (including the figure of 6,000,000 Jewish victims), acknowledges non-Jewish victims, and recognizes acts of resistance and the role of American liberators. The recitals are both descriptive and prescriptive — they establish the moral rationale for a day of remembrance and call attention to the educational value of teaching about heroism and human rights.
The body of the resolution contains two operative moves. First, it proclaims April 24, 2025, as California Holocaust Memorial Day and formally urges Californians to observe that date "in an appropriate manner." Second, it tasks the Secretary of the Senate with transmitting sufficient copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
The resolution also cites the United States Holocaust Memorial Council’s Days of Remembrance, explicitly linking the state proclamation to existing national commemoration frameworks like Yom HaShoah.Legally, SCR 46 is a concurrent resolution — a formal statement by the Legislature that expresses collective sentiment but does not create binding legal obligations, appropriations, or regulatory duties. The bill identifies no enforcement mechanism, no grant program, and no required actions by state agencies.
Its immediate effect is rhetorical and programmatic: it gives public institutions and community groups a legislative reference to justify or organize remembrance activities in 2025.Practically, expect this resolution to be used by school districts, museums, synagogues, and civil-rights groups to schedule events, coordinate curricula, and secure local partnerships. Because it does not appropriate funds or change statutory duties, any follow-on activity that requires money or curriculum changes will rely on separate administrative or budgetary actions.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution proclaims April 24, 2025, as "California Holocaust Memorial Day.", SCR 46 is a concurrent resolution adopted by the Legislature; it is declaratory and does not create enforceable legal obligations or appropriate funds.
The text explicitly cites the figure of 6,000,000 Jewish victims and acknowledges millions of non-Jewish victims murdered under the Nazi regime.
The recitals single out a recent increase in antisemitic incidents, explicitly referencing the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent spikes in hate targeting the Jewish community.
The resolution instructs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit sufficient copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Historical findings and rationale for remembrance
This section collects the Legislature’s statement of facts and motives: it recounts the scale of the Holocaust, identifies primary and secondary victim groups, recognizes rescuers and liberators, and frames Holocaust remembrance as both a moral imperative and an educational duty. Those recitals set the normative justification for the operative proclamation and can be cited by educators and community leaders when organizing events.
Proclamation of April 24, 2025 as California Holocaust Memorial Day
This clause is the substantive declaratory act: the Legislature proclaims a specific date for statewide remembrance and urges citizens to observe it "in an appropriate manner." Because the language is exhortatory rather than mandatory, it imposes no statutory requirements on schools, agencies, or private actors, but it does create an official date for commemoration that organizations can use for planning and publicity.
Administrative transmission
The resolution directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit sufficient copies to the author for distribution. This is a standard administrative step that ensures the author has official copies for stakeholders, press, and constituent communication; it also implicitly facilitates outreach to community organizations and institutions that will organize observance events.
Reference to federal Days of Remembrance and Yom HaShoah
The resolution aligns California’s proclamation with federal commemoration practices by citing the United States Holocaust Memorial Council and Yom HaShoah. That cross-reference provides organizations a tie to national observance frameworks, potentially easing coordination and signaling that the state’s commemoration is part of broader remembrance efforts rather than an isolated statement.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Civil Rights across all five countries.
Explore Civil Rights in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- California Jewish communities: The resolution offers formal recognition and public visibility of Holocaust remembrance, supporting community requests for memorial events and public statements against antisemitism.
- Educators and school districts: Teachers and district leaders gain a legislative reference to justify classroom lessons, assemblies, or commemorative programming tied to the April 24, 2025 date.
- Holocaust museums and memorial organizations: The proclamation provides a state-level platform for scheduling exhibits, outreach, and coordinated remembrance programming tied to national Days of Remembrance.
- Holocaust survivors and families of victims: The official recognition validates remembrance efforts and may increase public attention and attendance at memorial events.
- Civil-rights and interfaith groups: Organizations that monitor or combat hate receive a state-backed statement that can support advocacy, awareness campaigns, and coalition-building.
Who Bears the Cost
- Local school districts and educators: While not mandated, districts that choose to observe the day may need to allocate instructional time, staff, or materials to commemoration activities, which carries modest administrative and program costs.
- Local governments and community organizations: Hosting public events typically requires venue, security, and outreach resources; these costs fall to municipalities, nonprofit organizations, or faith communities that elect to participate.
- Secretary of the Senate and legislative staff: Administrative effort and printing costs to transmit copies to the author are minor but incumbent on legislative staff.
- Organizations asked to coordinate statewide remembrance: Museums and nonprofits may absorb additional operating costs if they take a lead role in statewide programming without new state funding.
- Policymakers seeking stronger interventions: Stakeholders who prefer concrete policy responses to antisemitism (funding, enforcement, curriculum mandates) may face the cost of having to pursue separate, potentially contentious legislation since this measure is symbolic only.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is symbolic recognition versus substantive remedy: SCR 46 strengthens public remembrance and signals opposition to antisemitism, but it stops short of binding actions—leaving advocates to choose between accepting a declaratory statement or pushing for concrete, potentially costly policy measures (curriculum mandates, funding, enforcement) to address the same concerns.
The resolution is explicitly symbolic: it proclaims a date and urges observance without creating duties, funding, or enforcement mechanisms. That raises a practical question about impact: symbolic recognition can amplify awareness, but it does not, by itself, change school curricula, create grants for memorial programs, or strengthen hate-crime enforcement — follow-up action would require separate legislation or administrative decisions.
The bill names a specific calendar date — April 24, 2025 — rather than creating a recurring, annually observed state holiday tied to the Jewish calendar (Yom HaShoah varies year to year). That choice limits the resolution’s temporal scope and may create coordination challenges for communities that observe Holocaust remembrance according to the Hebrew calendar.
The bill also links commemoration to contemporary events (the Oct. 7, 2023 attack and subsequent rise in antisemitism), which strengthens its immediacy but risks conflating historical remembrance with contemporary geopolitical disputes in ways that could polarize participation.
Implementation questions remain vague: "observe in an appropriate manner" is undefined, and the resolution provides no guidance on whether observance should be curricular, ceremonial, or private, leaving local authorities to interpret the exhortation. Finally, because the resolution ties state-level messaging to federal Days of Remembrance, organizations may expect coordination or resources that the state has not committed to provide, generating potential mismatches between expectations and available support.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.