HB1171 amends Part XXIII of the Colorado appropriation statutes to make supplemental changes to the Department of the Treasury budget for the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. It reallocates and supplements funding across administration, the Unclaimed Property Program, and multiple special‑purpose line items, and it adjusts several previously enacted line items.
The bill routes money from a mix of cash funds, continuously appropriated funds, and transfers to satisfy one‑time obligations—most notably reimbursements tied to property tax exemptions, lease purchase payments for academic facilities, Highway Users Tax Fund distributions, and a large direct distribution aimed at PERA’s unfunded actuarial liability. It also authorizes narrow internal transfers within the Unclaimed Property Program and codifies informational appropriations that are continuously appropriated elsewhere.
At a Glance
What It Does
Amends the Treasury portion of the general appropriation to increase or modify line items and funding sources, adds one‑time distributions, and authorizes limited intra‑program transfers. Several entries are informational because the underlying cash funds are continuously appropriated.
Who It Affects
State Treasury (administration and unclaimed property operations), county and municipal treasurers receiving reimbursement, the Colorado Department of Transportation and Transportation Commission (through Highway Users Tax Fund allocations and SB17‑267 collateralization payments), PERA and its members (via the direct distribution), and education entities receiving lease purchase proceeds.
Why It Matters
The bill reallocates existing trust and cash fund balances to meet near‑term obligations and to reduce a pension liability—moves that affect cash availability for claimants and long‑term funds, change state fiscal reporting, and influence local government revenue flows.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB1171 revises the Department of the Treasury appropriation tables in statute. It updates the administration budget lines (personal services, benefits, operating expenses, IT maintenance and legal services) and reassigns the funding mix used to pay those costs, including increased reliance on cash management fees and money from the Unclaimed Property Trust Fund principal for some administration costs.
The bill also restates and funds the Unclaimed Property Program for the relevant fiscal year, including personal services, operating expenses, promotion and correspondence, and contract auditor services. It explicitly allows the Treasury to move a modest amount of cash funds—up to $37,850—between the program’s personal services and operating expense line items to manage minor shortfalls.
Contract auditor payments remain continuously appropriated and are shown for informational purposes.The Special Purpose section contains the largest dollar items. HB1171 funds county reimbursements tied to the senior‑citizen and disabled‑veteran property tax exemption and the business personal property tax exemption, supplies estimated Highway Users Tax Fund distributions to counties and municipalities, and funds multiple lease‑purchase obligations for academic facilities.
It also authorizes a large, one‑time direct distribution intended to reduce the state’s portion of PERA’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability and includes a $150 million allocation for S.B.17‑267 collateralization lease purchase payments (split in statute between $100 million and $50 million). Several of these amounts are labeled as informational or (I) because they draw from continuously appropriated cash funds or are included to comply with the state spending limit rules.Finally, the bill makes corresponding edits to the prior fiscal year appropriation language and includes the standard safety clause declaring the act necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health, or safety.
Many funding lines are tied to statutory trust funds and contain footnotes specifying sources, (I) notations, and whether an appropriation is exempt from certain constitutional spending limits.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill directs a $225,000,000 one‑time direct distribution toward the unfunded actuarial accrued PERA liability (with portions identified as attributable to public education and the state).
It includes $150,000,000 for S.B.17‑267 collateralization lease purchase payments, shown as a split of $100,000,000 and $50,000,000 from transportation‑controlled cash funds.
HB1171 funds county reimbursements for the senior citizen and disabled veteran property tax exemption—listed at $180,237,698—and for the business personal property tax exemption at $17,948,526.
The Unclaimed Property Program appropriation is increased and the bill authorizes the Treasury to transfer up to $37,850 among that program's personal services and operating expense line items (footnote 104a); it also uses Unclaimed Property Trust Fund principal for several administrative line items.
Multiple large entries are included as informational because they draw from continuously appropriated cash funds (for example, State Public Financing Cash Fund and Charter School Financing Administrative Cash Fund) or are exempted from the General Fund spending limit by constitutional provision.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Changes to administrative staffing, benefits, and operating funding
This part revises personal services, benefit, and operating lines for the Department of the Treasury and shifts the mix of fund sources that pay those items. The bill increases or adjusts allocations for health and retirement costs, IT asset maintenance, legal services, and payments to the Office of Information Technology. Importantly, it directs some administrative costs to be paid from cash management transaction fees and the Unclaimed Property Trust Fund principal, which changes how Treasury’s overhead is financed and reduces reliance on the General Fund for certain components.
Funding and limited transfer authority for claim administration
The bill appropriates the Unclaimed Property Program’s staff and operating budget and separately lists promotion, contract auditor services, and other expenditures. Contract auditor payments are shown as continuously appropriated revenues collected by those auditors. Footnote 104a gives the Treasury authority to transfer up to $37,850 cash funds between the program’s personal services and operating expense lines—an explicitly narrow reallocation tool intended to cover small intra‑program needs without further legislative action.
Large one‑time distributions and informational appropriations
This section contains the bill’s largest dollar items: county reimbursements for property tax exemptions, Highway Users Tax Fund distributions to counties and municipalities, lease purchase payments for academic facilities, a $150 million entry tied to SB17‑267 collateralization, and the $225 million direct distribution for PERA’s unfunded liability. Many of these entries are tied to cash funds or transfers and are flagged as informational or (I) notation because the underlying cash sources are continuously appropriated or exempt from standard spending limits. The practical effect is to record and authorize these payments in the general appropriation act while recognizing their special fund status.
Technical and amount adjustments to prior fiscal year totals
HB1171 also revises the Department of the Treasury numbers in the 2024 appropriation language—changing personnel FTE counts, benefit lines, and the composition of fund sources for those earlier allocations. Those amendments reconcile prior entries with updated estimates of cash management fees, unclaimed property balances, and continuously appropriated fund flows.
Immediate‑effect finding
The act includes the customary safety clause declaring the measure necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health, or safety. Practically, this language supports immediate implementation of the appropriation changes and one‑time payments rather than delaying them until a later date.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- County treasurers and local governments — receive statutorily estimated reimbursements tied to the senior‑citizen/disabled‑veteran and business personal property tax exemptions, improving their short‑term cash flows.
- Public education and institutions of higher education — benefit indirectly through lease‑purchase payments and a portion of the PERA distribution identified as attributable to K–12 education, which can ease local budget pressures tied to retirement contributions.
- PERA and public employees — the $225 million direct distribution reduces a portion of PERA’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability, improving actuarial metrics and potentially moderating future contribution pressures.
- Department of the Treasury — gains explicit funding for Unclaimed Property administration and limited transfer flexibility to manage program operations and contract auditors, stabilizing short‑term staffing and outreach capacity.
- Transportation recipients (counties and municipalities) — the bill includes estimated Highway Users Tax Fund allocations and S.B.17‑267 collateralization payments that support road and transit expenditures.
Who Bears the Cost
- Unclaimed Property Trust Fund principal — the statute identifies the fund’s principal as a source for administrative line items, which reduces the pool available for future claim payments or program reserves.
- Transportation cash funds under the control of the Transportation Commission — the S.B.17‑267 collateralization line and other transportation‑linked items draw on these cash balances and may constrain other recommended uses.
- State fiscal managers and the Treasury — implementing large one‑time payments and navigating mixed funding rules (informational vs continuously appropriated lines) increases administrative complexity and reconciliation workload.
- Statewide budget flexibility — although several items are exempt from the General Fund spending limit or shown as informational, they still represent outflows that affect the state’s overall cash position and future budgeting choices.
- Departments receiving transferred funds (for example, Department of Personnel transfers tied to PERA accounting) — must coordinate interagency transfers and adjust internal budgets to reflect the statutory changes.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is choosing between immediate, visible relief (large one‑time payments and reimbursements that address political and fiscal priorities now) and protecting the long‑term integrity of dedicated fund principals and recurring revenue streams; the bill solves near‑term cash‑flow and actuarial concerns but does so by reallocating or drawing down funds that were intended for ongoing purposes.
HB1171 packs significant one‑time moves into an appropriations vehicle rather than establishing new programs. That strategy speeds payment but creates implementation challenges.
Using Unclaimed Property Trust Fund principal to cover administration reduces the fund’s cushion for claimants; while the amounts appear modest relative to the large special purpose entries, principal erosion can compound if repeated. Similarly, the large, one‑time PERA distribution improves actuarial positions now, but it does not change the underlying recurring actuarial dynamics—future contributions and actuarial assumptions will still drive long‑term pension health.
Another complication is the mixture of continuously appropriated cash funds and informational entries. The bill lists some items for compliance with the state spending limit and shows other entries as informational because the underlying statutory appropriation resides elsewhere.
That approach preserves constitutional accounting but can obscure the practical fiscal effect of a transfer or payment and complicates legislative or public oversight. Finally, the limits on intra‑program transfers for Unclaimed Property (a $37,850 cap) are narrow; if program needs exceed that amount, the Treasury will need supplemental action or internal reallocation from other funds, which raises timing and governance issues.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.