House Bill 773 is a statutory housekeeping measure that amends the state's credit-union liquidity statute (Section 26-2128) and repeals a block of provisions (Sections 26-2170 through 26-2186) that previously defined, organized, and governed the “Idaho Corporate Credit Union.” The measure also repeals two cemetery-related sections (27-406 and 27-409) and includes an emergency clause making the act effective July 1, 2026.
The practical effect is simple on paper: remove what the Legislature has labeled obsolete provisions and adjust a liquidity rule to explicitly allow certificates of deposit issued by the Idaho Corporate Credit Union to count toward a state-chartered credit union’s liquidity reserves. In practice, the bill eliminates the state-level statutory regime for a corporate credit union and leaves several operational and transitional questions unresolved for credit unions, the Department of Finance, and property stakeholders tied to the repealed cemetery provisions.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill rewrites Section 26-2128 (liquidity requirements) and repeals Sections 26-2170–26-2186 (the statutory framework for the Idaho Corporate Credit Union) plus Sections 27-406 and 27-409 (cemetery owner duties/application). It declares an emergency and sets an effective date of July 1, 2026.
Who It Affects
State-chartered credit unions and any entity that operated as the Idaho Corporate Credit Union, the Idaho Department of Finance (the director who approves liquidity depositories), and owners/operators of cemeteries referenced in the repealed sections.
Why It Matters
Removing an entire block of corporate-credit-union statutes creates potential regulatory and contractual gaps for institutions that relied on those provisions, while the liquidity amendment preserves an explicit route for certain corporate-issued CDs to count as reserves. Compliance officers, counsel, and regulators need to assess transition, tax, and oversight consequences.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB 773 is framed as a cleanup: the Legislature identifies a set of named Idaho Code provisions as obsolete and removes them. The centerpiece change to operative law is an amended Section 26-2128, which keeps the existing two-tier liquidity structure for credit unions — a baseline liquidity reserve and an additional reserve for accounts withdrawable by negotiable instrument — and expressly allows certificates of deposit issued by the Idaho Corporate Credit Union to be used to meet liquidity requirements.
The amendment also keeps the existing treatment that reserves required under the federal Monetary Control Act count toward state liquidity requirements.
The bill then repeals a contiguous set of statutes (26-2170 through 26-2186) that, together, previously defined, established, and regulated the Idaho Corporate Credit Union: definitions, organization, membership rules, corporate powers, governance, lending to member credit unions, reserve allocations, dividends, and tax treatment. Removing that block effectively strips the Idaho Code of a standalone state statutory regime for a corporate credit union; the bill contains no transitional language addressing existing corporate assets, contracts, tax status, or the transfer of statutory responsibilities.HB 773 also removes two cemetery-related provisions in Chapter 27 (sections 27-406 and 27-409).
The text gives no replacement language or cross-reference, so any duties or remedies those sections created will no longer appear in the Code once the repeal becomes effective. Finally, the bill contains an emergency declaration making the changes effective July 1, 2026, which accelerates the need for regulators and affected parties to evaluate the operational impact and any required administrative steps.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends Section 26-2128 to preserve a 4% baseline liquidity reserve and an additional 10% reserve for share/deposit accounts withdrawable by negotiable instrument, with monthly computation on average daily deposits and cash on hand.
Section 26-2128, as amended, explicitly permits certificates of deposit issued by the Idaho Corporate Credit Union to count toward a state-chartered credit union’s liquidity reserve.
HB 773 repeals Sections 26-2170 through 26-2186 — a contiguous block that previously set out the definitions, governance, powers, membership, loans, reserve allocations, dividends, and tax treatment of the Idaho Corporate Credit Union.
The bill also repeals Sections 27-406 and 27-409, removing two statutory provisions that previously addressed the duty of cemetery owners and the application of law to cemeteries.
The act includes an emergency clause making the repeals and amendment effective on July 1, 2026, requiring affected parties to plan for a near-term transition.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Legislative intent and cleanup framing
The bill opens with a legislative-intent clause tying the measure to the Idaho Code Cleanup Act and stating the goal of removing obsolete provisions. This is a standard housekeeping preface that frames subsequent repeals as non-substantive cleanup rather than a policy overhaul; practitioners should still test that characterization against operational realities for affected entities.
Updated liquidity reserve language and express inclusion of corporate CDs
This provision restates the two-tier liquidity requirement (4% general reserve; plus 10% for negotiable-instrument withdrawable accounts) and clarifies computation on average daily deposits and cash on hand. Critically, it adds an explicit sentence allowing certificates of deposit issued by the Idaho Corporate Credit Union to qualify as liquidity holdings, and confirms that reserves required under the federal Monetary Control Act count as state liquidity reserves rather than additional obligations.
Removal of the Idaho Corporate Credit Union statutory framework
These repeals remove the entire state statutory structure that previously defined, incorporated, and regulated the Idaho Corporate Credit Union, including provisions on organization, board and officer duties, membership eligibility, loans to member credit unions, reserve and dividend rules, compensation, and tax treatment. Practically, the Code will no longer contain a dedicated chapter authorizing or governing a state corporate credit union; whether that creates a regulatory vacuum depends on whether the corporate entity exists by other authority (e.g., federal charter) or has already wound down.
Repeal of two cemetery-owner provisions
The bill removes two statutes located in Chapter 27 that related to a cemetery owner's duties and the application of certain laws to cemeteries. There is no replacement language or cross-reference. This creates a narrower — but consequential — deletion in property and probate-adjacent law that could affect owners’ affirmative duties or local enforcement mechanisms.
Emergency declaration and effective date
The act declares an emergency and sets the effective date as July 1, 2026. The emergency language accelerates when affected institutions and regulators must respond and means there is limited time to resolve transitional or interpretive issues before the statutes are removed from the Code.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Idaho Legislature/Department of Finance — fewer obsolete provisions to manage and cite in guidance or rulemaking, reducing statutory clutter.
- State-code users and attorneys — a cleaner statutory text may reduce confusion where obsolete cross-references previously existed, improving statutory navigation.
- Credit unions operating under federal corporate structures — if the repealed state framework had been redundant, these entities may benefit from fewer conflicting state rules and clearer reliance on federal regulation.
Who Bears the Cost
- Any existing Idaho Corporate Credit Union (or member credit unions relying on it) — losing the state statutory framework may create legal uncertainty about corporate existence, powers, contracts, taxation, and how outstanding loans or shares are treated.
- Idaho Department of Finance — the regulator will likely face immediate implementation work and interpretive demands to address gaps, clarify approval authority for depositories, and advise state-chartered credit unions.
- Owners/operators of cemeteries and their counsel — the repeal of two cemetery provisions may remove statutory duties or remedies they relied on and could shift dispute resolution to general property law or local ordinances.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between tidy statutory housekeeping and the risk of creating real-world legal and regulatory gaps: the Legislature intends to remove obsolete law, but eliminating a whole statutory regime for a corporate credit union (and two cemetery statutes) without transitional rules shifts uncertainty and potential costs onto institutions, regulators, and property stakeholders who relied on those provisions.
The bill’s practical risks hinge on transition and omission rather than on the facial content of the repeals. Removing an entire statutory block that defines and governs the Idaho Corporate Credit Union without transitional provisions leaves unanswered how existing contracts, certificates of deposit, loans, reserve allocations, tax treatment, and corporate existence are to be treated.
If an Idaho Corporate Credit Union still exists or if member credit unions rely on it for liquidity, the repeal could unsettle contractual counterparties, trustees, and tax filings.
There is also a textual tension inside the bill: the amended liquidity statute explicitly permits certificates of deposit issued by the Idaho Corporate Credit Union to meet liquidity requirements, while the same bill repeals the statutory provisions that previously defined and authorized that corporate credit union. That juxtaposition raises an interpretive question — does the Legislature intend to preserve practical referencing to an entity that no longer has a state statutory underpinning, or is the liquidity sentence vestigial and meant to cover existing instruments only?
Separately, the cemetery-section repeals are concise and unconditional; absent cross-references or replacement language, courts or local governments may need to fill gaps, potentially producing inconsistent local outcomes.
Operationally, regulators and affected institutions have little runway: the emergency effective date gives parties limited time to negotiate amendments to contracts, confirm tax and insurance treatment, and obtain clarity from the Department of Finance. These implementation questions are the core policy risk of a cleanup bill that removes substantive governance provisions without transitional scaffolding.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.