HB 905 amends R.S. 17:3217(B)(1) to change the statutory name of the state maritime academy from "Universities of Louisiana Maritime Academy at Nicholls State University" to "Louisiana Maritime Academy at Nicholls State University." The bill does not alter the academy’s enumerated purposes—coordinating maritime programs, training merchant marine officers, or aligning education with maritime workforce needs.
The change is nominal but consequential for administrators and partners: state statutes, institutional records, contracts, accreditation filings, federal registrations, diplomas, and marketing materials that reference the academy’s legal name will likely require updates or notifications. The bill imposes no new programmatic duties or funding changes; its primary effects are legal and administrative.
At a Glance
What It Does
Amends R.S. 17:3217(B)(1) to replace the statutory name "Universities of Louisiana Maritime Academy at Nicholls State University" with "Louisiana Maritime Academy at Nicholls State University." The statute’s language that defines the academy’s purposes remains unchanged.
Who It Affects
Directly affects Nicholls State University, the University of Louisiana System, students and faculty in the state maritime program, state administrative offices that maintain legal and educational records, and third parties (accreditors, federal maritime agencies, and contract counterparties) that reference the academy by its statutory name.
Why It Matters
A legal name change is simple on its face but can cascade into many operational tasks—updating statutes, diplomas, grant documents, accreditation records, and federal registrations—and could create short-term administrative costs or procedural confusion if other laws or agreements still use the old name.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB 905 is a focused amendment: it changes one statutory phrase in R.S. 17:3217(B)(1), replacing the pluralized institutional label with a shorter, brand-oriented name. The bill leaves intact the sentence that establishes the state maritime academy’s purposes—coordinating existing maritime programs and facilities, training merchant marine officers, and creating education pathways tied to industry needs—so the academy’s legal mission and functions remain the same.
Because the statute provides the academy’s official legal name, the amendment has downstream work attached. State and institutional records that use the statutory name—contracts, memoranda of understanding, grant and scholarship instruments, program accreditation files, internal governance documents, and promotional materials—will need review for consistency.
Administrative owners (Nicholls, the University of Louisiana System, and relevant state offices) will have to decide which documents require formal amendment, which can remain in force with the old name noted, and which federal or accreditation registrations need notification.The bill does not include transitional language or an effective-date provision tied to record updates, leaving implementation details to administrators. That silence raises routine but practical questions: whether diplomas issued before the change must bear the new name, how to treat contracts that reference the old statutory name, and whether federal agencies that recognize state maritime academies must be formally notified to preserve eligibility for federal programs.
Those procedural questions will drive the actual cost and timeline for bringing institutional and third-party records into alignment.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends exactly one statutory provision: R.S. 17:3217(B)(1).
It replaces the name "Universities of Louisiana Maritime Academy at Nicholls State University" with "Louisiana Maritime Academy at Nicholls State University.", The statutory text that sets the academy’s purposes—coordinating programs, training merchant marine officers, and aligning with workforce needs—remains unchanged.
The practical impacts are administrative: updating state and institutional records, diplomas, contracts, accreditation dossiers, and possibly notifying federal maritime authorities and accrediting bodies.
HB 905 does not change governance, funding, curriculum, or regulatory duties for the academy; it is a nominal rename, not a substantive policy overhaul.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Change the academy's statutory name
This is the operative text of the bill: a targeted edit replacing the previous statutory label with the new name. The change is textual only—no clauses that define responsibilities, funding, or governance are modified. For legal purposes, the academy’s 'official' name in state law will be the new phrase once the amendment becomes law.
Retains existing statement of purposes
Although the bill alters the name, it expressly leaves the portion of the statute that describes the academy's functions intact. That means the legislature preserves the academy’s role in coordinating maritime programs, training merchant mariners, and developing workforce pathways; those obligations continue to be the statutory baseline for program planning and external reporting.
Obligations to update records and agreements
A name change in statute creates a practical checklist: update institutional charters, board resolutions, contracts, grants, diploma templates, public-facing materials, and internal systems. Some documents will require formal amendments; others can be left in force but should be referenced in transition documentation. The statute itself provides the legal name that courts and agencies will rely on for identification and enforcement.
Potential need to notify accrediting and federal maritime bodies
State maritime programs interact with federal agencies (for example, those that certify merchant mariners or administer maritime education funding) and with accreditors. While HB 905 does not mandate notifications, administrative offices should assess which federal registers, accreditation files, and grantor records must be updated to avoid gaps in recognition, certification, or eligibility tied to the academy's legal identity.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Nicholls State University — Gains a shorter, clearer institutional brand for its maritime program that may simplify marketing, recruiting, and internal identity.
- University of Louisiana System — Simplifies the statutory naming convention for a system-managed program, reducing the clumsiness of the previous pluralized title.
- Prospective maritime students and employers — Benefit from clearer program identity and simpler references when verifying credentials or recruiting graduates.
Who Bears the Cost
- Nicholls State University administration — Will pay the immediate administrative costs of updating official records, diplomas, websites, marketing materials, and signage; legal review of contracts may be required.
- University of Louisiana System and state administrative offices — Must coordinate statutory indexing, update published code references, and manage any formal amendments to system-level documents or agreements.
- Accrediting bodies and federal agencies (potentially) — May need to process name-change notifications and update public registries or program approvals, creating administrative workload and possible filing fees.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central trade-off is between the symbolic and branding value of a streamlined statutory name and the real-world administrative and regulatory friction that follows a legal name change: clarity and simplicity for future communications versus near-term costs, coordination burdens, and potential gaps in third-party recognition.
The bill is narrow in scope, but that narrowness produces practical implementation questions that the text does not resolve. Most consequentially, HB 905 contains no transitional or effective-date language addressing how to treat preexisting documents—diplomas, contracts, grant awards, or licenses—that bear the old statutory name.
Institutions will need to decide whether to execute formal amendments, issue clarifying rider documents, or accept the legal continuity of agreements executed under the prior name. Those choices affect legal risk, administrative cost, and stakeholder expectations.
A second tension arises from cross-references in other statutes, regulations, or contracts that mention the old name verbatim. The legislature changed a single citation point in the code, but if other provisions quote the old name or rely on precise statutory phrasing, administrators may need to coordinate a broader cleanup to avoid ambiguity.
Finally, the potential need to notify federal maritime agencies, accreditors, and certification bodies creates a compliance dimension outside state control: until those third parties update their records, students and the institution could face paperwork friction when seeking federal benefits, certifications, or interagency recognition.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.