SB135 amends R.S. 27:625(G)(2) to change how sports wagering tax receipts are credited to the Louisiana Early Childhood Education Fund. Under current law the fund received 25 percent of net gaming proceeds from sports wagering but that amount could not exceed $20 million; SB135 replaces that cap with a guarantee: the fund will receive 25 percent of proceeds or $20 million, whichever is greater.
The change creates a guaranteed minimum payment to early childhood programs beginning July 1, 2026. That stability benefits program planning and providers but reallocates fiscal exposure: when wagering receipts are low the increased floor must come from the same distribution pool, which will reduce the amounts available to other statutorily-dedicated recipients or require offsetting budget adjustments elsewhere.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill rewrites the distribution formula in R.S. 27:625(G)(2) so the Louisiana Early Childhood Education Fund receives either 25% of sports-wagering net proceeds or $20 million, whichever is greater, instead of capping the 25% at $20 million. The state treasurer must credit that amount each fiscal year after satisfying Subsection D priorities.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Louisiana Early Childhood Education Fund and any programs paid from it (grants, subsidies, program contracts). Indirectly affects other beneficiaries of the sports-wagering distribution pool, state budget officials, and the treasurer’s office that administers credits.
Why It Matters
It establishes a revenue floor for early childhood funding and shifts downside revenue risk away from those programs. That change can force reductions in other statutorily dedicated distributions or require legislative budget offsets, altering fiscal planning across agencies that share sports-wagering revenue.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Louisiana collects a tax on sports-wagering net gaming proceeds and then credits portions of those proceeds to several funds in a statutorily ordered distribution. SB135 makes a narrowly targeted change to one line in that distribution schedule: how much goes to the Louisiana Early Childhood Education Fund.
Under the bill the treasurer still follows the same crediting sequence, but the amount that lands in the Early Childhood Education Fund will be the greater of two figures: 25% of the sports-wagering receipts for the fiscal year, or a guaranteed $20 million. Practically this creates a floor — in a low-receipt year the fund gets $20 million even if 25% would have been less.Because the law directs credits to multiple recipients from the same pool, the guaranteed $20 million operates by priority in the existing schedule.
If total receipts are insufficient to satisfy all statutory credits, the guaranteed payment will consume a larger share of the pool and decrease the residual available to other dedicated recipients; if receipts are plentiful, the allocation functionally remains a straight 25% share.The bill does not change the tax rate on sports wagering, it only changes the arithmetic of the distribution. It takes effect July 1, 2026, and therefore will affect fiscal-year budgeting and program planning beginning with that fiscal year.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Amends R.S. 27:625(G)(2) to alter the sports-wagering distribution for early childhood funding.
Replaces the prior $20 million cap on the Early Childhood Education Fund with a $20 million floor: the fund receives 25% of receipts or $20 million, whichever is greater.
Applies to the annual crediting process the treasurer performs after satisfying Subsection D priorities.
Does not change the sports-wagering tax rate or the order of credited recipients — it changes only the amount allocated to the Early Childhood Education Fund.
Takes effect July 1, 2026, making it applicable to fiscal-year allocations thereafter.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Switches the $20M cap to a $20M floor for the Early Childhood Education Fund
This is the operative amendment. The section replaces language that capped the fund’s 25% share at $20 million with language that guarantees at least $20 million by requiring the treasurer to credit the greater of 25% or $20 million. For administrators this is a formula change: the treasurer will compute 25% of net proceeds and then compare it to $20 million, crediting the larger figure. The change preserves the percentage share in high-receipt years while bolstering the fund in down years.
How this interacts with the existing distribution sequence
R.S. 27:625 directs the treasurer to make credits to multiple funds in a particular order. SB135 leaves that order intact; its impact depends on the pool remaining after Subsection D priorities are satisfied. Where total receipts are limited, a guaranteed $20 million to early childhood increases the likelihood that downstream recipients receive less. Agencies that currently rely on other dedicated credits should anticipate larger variability in their future allocations.
Effective July 1, 2026
The bill takes effect at the start of the 2026–27 fiscal year. That timing means the change will affect budget planning and contracts tied to the Early Childhood Education Fund beginning with FY 2026–27. The section contains standard veto-revival language making the date the later of July 1, 2026 or the day following legislative veto override.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Louisiana Early Childhood Education Fund — wins a stable, statutory minimum annual deposit which improves revenue predictability for grantmaking and provider contracts.
- Early childhood providers and program operators (childcare centers, Head Start collaborators receiving state supplements) — gain revenue stability that supports staffing, enrollment commitments, and multi-year contracts.
- Families and children served by programs funded through the Early Childhood Education Fund — benefit from reduced risk of service cuts during years of lower wagering receipts.
- State policymakers and agencies that prioritize early childhood investment — gain a policy lever that secures baseline funding without needing annual appropriations.
Who Bears the Cost
- Other statutorily dedicated recipients of sports-wagering revenue under R.S. 27:625 — they may receive smaller allocations in years when the $20 million floor binds, because the same revenue pool is reallocated.
- State budget office and treasurer’s office — must implement the amended calculation, track comparisons year to year, and manage intra-year cash flows if receipts are volatile.
- Legislators and appropriators — face pressure to identify offsets or supplemental appropriations for affected programs if the guaranteed payment reduces other critical credits.
- Program areas financed by residuals or lower-priority credits (local projects, certain grants) — these can see increased volatility or cuts when the $20 million floor consumes a larger share of limited receipts.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between securing reliable, minimum funding for early childhood programs and preserving the legislature’s and other program recipients’ flexibility to adjust when gaming revenues fall: the bill locks in stability for one priority by increasing the likelihood that other statutorily promised recipients face reductions or the need for legislative offsets.
The bill trades fiscal flexibility for program stability. Guaranteeing at least $20 million to early childhood programs smooths funding for those services but shifts downside risk onto other recipients who share the same statutory distribution pool.
The statute does not create a new revenue source; it reallocates the existing pool. That means in low-receipt years other dedicated credits absorb the reduction unless the legislature or treasury provides an appropriation outside the pool.
Operationally there are open implementation questions. The statute instructs the treasurer to credit amounts after Subsection D priorities but does not say how to handle an overall shortfall that prevents all statutory credits from being made in full; practice will depend on interpretation of priority language elsewhere in R.S. 27:625 and on cash-management choices.
Finally, the change could affect multi-year commitments and contracts tied to both the Early Childhood Education Fund and other beneficiaries — agencies should revise fiscal projections and contingency plans to reflect the shifted allocation rule.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.