HB983 makes a suite of across‑the‑board changes to Maryland tax incentives and exemptions. The bill (1) tightens how the Department of Commerce designates and expands Enterprise Zones, creates a $60 million trigger that can pause new designations and expansions, and sunsets Enterprise Zone tax credit eligibility on January 1, 2031 (while preserving benefits for entities already located there before termination); (2) changes multiple refundable and nonrefundable tax credits by imposing per‑entity and aggregate limits, shortening authorization windows for some credits, and terminating others; and (3) repeals several targeted exemptions and discounts, while adding back certain dividend deductions for real estate investment trusts (REITs) to Maryland taxable income.
For taxpayers, developers, local governments, and film producers the package matters because it reduces the State’s open‑ended exposure to enterprise and production credits, narrows who can claim certain incentives, and shifts timing and compliance requirements. The bill centralizes more fiscal control with Commerce and the Comptroller, creates new numeric ceilings and first‑come/first‑served rules for some credits, and tightens reporting and carryforward rules—changes that will affect project feasibility, tax planning, and local development strategies.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill restricts Enterprise Zone designations and expansions when property‑tax credit exposure appears likely to exceed $60 million; caps Enterprise Zone income credits at $250,000 per business and $2 million total per year (first‑come, first‑served); sunsets Enterprise Zone credit eligibility January 1, 2031; adds REIT dividend deductions back to Maryland taxable income; and revises film credit issuance, carryforward, and small‑film eligibility and funding rules.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include businesses seeking Enterprise Zone and One Maryland credits, film production entities (including a carve‑out for Maryland small/independent producers), owners of qualified property receiving property‑tax credits, REITs and entities that receive REIT dividends, licensed fuel dealers (loss of a motor‑fuel dealer discount), and contractors or firms that previously used certain sales/use tax exemptions.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts the balance between incentivizing local investment and limiting State fiscal exposure: it preserves some existing beneficiaries through grandfathering while tightening future eligibility and imposing hard quantitative caps. For compliance and deal teams, the change alters valuation of tax incentives, timing of credit claims, and documentation and reporting obligations for both applicants and local governments.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB983 is a package of targeted rollbacks, caps, and structural fixes to several Maryland tax incentive programs. It rewrites the Enterprise Zone designation rules to require specified local labor and poverty metrics at the census‑tract level, and it gives the Secretary of Commerce an explicit budgetary backstop: if Commerce reasonably anticipates that property‑tax credits claimed the prior fiscal year may exceed $60 million, the Secretary cannot designate a new enterprise zone or approve certain expansions in the current fiscal year.
The subtitle that governs Enterprise Zone incentives is set to terminate on January 1, 2031, though businesses that locate in zones before that date remain eligible for benefits under the existing code sections if they meet conditions for each benefit.
The bill carves down claimable State income tax credits tied to Enterprise Zones: it requires claims to be processed on a first‑come, first‑served basis and caps what a single business entity may claim at $250,000 in a taxable year, with a $2,000,000 aggregate cap on credits claimed by all business entities each taxable year. It also imposes a $500,000 ceiling on the amount of the property‑tax credit any single qualified property may receive in a taxable year.
For local governments, HB983 tightens reporting obligations and requires an annual aggregation and submission of county and municipal credit data to the General Assembly.HB983 reorganizes the film production activity credit by stating its purpose (to incentivize in‑State production and related economic activity), tightening annual overall authorizations and carryforward mechanics, and formalizing a small/independent film carve‑out. The Secretary’s annual issuance for fiscal 2026 onward is capped at $12 million, with any carryforward from prior years limited to an aggregate $12 million, and a per‑project issuance cap of $10 million.
Small Maryland film entities qualify with lower in‑State spending thresholds ($25,000 minimum and at least 50% of filming in Maryland) and receive a 28% credit up to $125,000.The bill also makes discrete tax base and exemption changes: it adds amounts deducted under IRC §857 (REIT dividends‑paid deduction) back into Maryland taxable income for individuals and corporations; it repeals the 0.5% motor fuel dealer discount that previously compensated dealers for collection costs; it removes certain sales and use tax exemptions for equipment used in concrete production, specified telecommunications machinery and equipment, and construction/warehousing equipment used in target redevelopment areas; and it lowers the personal tobacco import allowance from five cartons to one carton. Several other credits (One Maryland, certain biotechnology and cybersecurity credits, and security‑clearance administrative expense credits) have shortened authority windows or are terminated earlier under the act.Timing and compliance are front‑loaded: portions of the bill apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025 or after June 30, 2026, with statutory effective dates staggered so tax practitioners and project sponsors need to map obligations to their fiscal and production calendars.
The Department of Commerce must evaluate the film credit and report to the General Assembly with recommendations, which creates a potential rulemaking and policy review cycle affecting how the program operates going forward.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Commerce cannot designate new enterprise zones or grant certain expansions in a fiscal year if it reasonably expects property‑tax credits claimed the prior fiscal year may exceed $60,000,000.
The Enterprise Zone income tax credit is now first‑come, first‑served, limited to $250,000 per business per taxable year and capped at $2,000,000 total claimed by all businesses per taxable year.
The Enterprise Zone subtitle (and, except for grandfathered in‑place businesses, eligibility for its State tax credits) terminates January 1, 2031; businesses locating in a zone before that date remain eligible if they meet program conditions.
The film production activity credit is re‑scoped: the Secretary’s annual issuance is generally capped at $12,000,000 (fiscal 2026 onward), the aggregate carryforward pool from prior years cannot exceed $12,000,000, per‑project issuance cannot exceed $10,000,000, and Maryland small/independent films qualify at $25,000 in State spending (50% in‑State shooting) with a 28% credit capped at $125,000.
The bill adds the IRC §857 REIT dividends‑paid deduction back to Maryland taxable income, repeals the 0.5% motor fuel dealer discount, removes several targeted sales and use tax exemptions, and reduces the personal tobacco import exemption to 1 carton.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Stricter designation rules, $60M trigger, and program sunset
The bill tightens the geographic and labor‑market tests Commerce uses to certify enterprise zones—shifting many criteria to the census‑tract level and clarifying when proximate tracts in the same county may be considered. It adds an administrative brake: if Commerce reasonably anticipates prior‑year property‑tax credit claims may exceed $60 million, it must stop new designations for that fiscal year. The subtitle creating zone benefits is set to terminate January 1, 2031; Commerce must preserve benefits for businesses already located in zones before that termination date, but no new eligibility will be generated after the sunset.
Expansion moratorium and focus‑area criteria
HB983 bars expansions (and limits extraordinary expansions) when the $60 million trigger applies and tightens the tests for focus‑area status by requiring multiple high‑need indicators at the tract level (unemployment, poverty, crime, substandard housing, or commercial vacancy). Practically, counties seeking expansions face an episodic, fiscally‑driven approval process and must assemble tract‑level data to meet the three‑of‑five metric test for focus areas.
One Maryland credit ends and carryforward rules
The One Maryland Economic Development Tax Credit Program is terminated by statute on January 1, 2027, with earned credits still available to be carried forward under existing carryforward rules. That ends future participation and freezes the pipeline to carryforward processing only for credits earned before termination.
REIT dividends‑paid deduction added back into Maryland taxable income
The bill adds back to Maryland adjusted gross income any amount deducted under IRC §857 for dividends paid by REITs—so taxpayers cannot claim that federal REIT dividends deduction to reduce Maryland taxable income. The corporate modification mirrors the individual change by adding the corresponding addition to Maryland modified income, which affects pass‑through entities, corporate shareholders, and downstream tax accounting for entities that receive REIT‑style distributions.
Per‑business and aggregate caps; first‑come, first‑served processing
The enterprise zone wage credit is converted to a capacity‑limited program: claims are processed first‑come, first‑served, and the statute caps each business at $250,000 per taxable year while also limiting the aggregate annual claims to $2,000,000. The bill preserves the ability of tax‑exempt organizations to apply credits to unrelated business taxable income, but the new ceilings materially reduce the scale of credits any large employer can plan to use in a given year.
Purpose, eligibility, issuance caps, and small‑film carve‑out
HB983 adds an explicit statutory purpose for the film tax credit—grow in‑State production, jobs, infrastructure, and tourism—and restructures program capacity. For fiscal 2026 onward the Secretary’s annual issuance cap is $12 million, with an aggregate prior‑year carryforward ceiling of $12 million and a $10 million cap on credits for a single production. The statute formalizes a Maryland small/independent film category (lower $25,000 in‑State spend threshold, 50% Maryland filming requirement) that qualifies for a 28% credit up to $125,000, while larger productions must meet a $250,000 in‑State cost threshold and receive 28% of qualifying costs (30% for television series). The Secretary retains audit and verification authority.
Shortened authority windows for security‑clearance and cybersecurity credits
The security‑clearance administrative expense and related SCIF credits are constrained to taxable years beginning before January 1, 2027; the cybersecurity technology and service tax credit program cannot receive awards for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026. These date changes compress the period during which businesses can qualify and claim those credits, effectively closing the window for new beneficiaries beyond the statutory cutoffs.
Repeals and caps: motor fuel discount, select sales/use exemptions, tobacco import, and property‑tax credit cap
HB983 repeals the 0.5% motor‑fuel dealer discount for collection and handling; removes narrowly tailored sales and use exemptions (including machinery used in bituminous concrete production and certain construction and warehousing equipment in target redevelopment areas); reduces the personal tobacco import exemption to one carton; and caps any single qualified property’s enterprise‑zone property tax credit at $500,000 per taxable year. The bill also tightens county and municipal reporting and requires the Department to aggregate local reports and submit combined findings to the General Assembly annually beginning December 31, 2027.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State of Maryland (fiscal control): By capping annual issuance and imposing hard numerical triggers and limits, the State reduces open‑ended exposure to property‑tax and income‑tax credits, making budgeting and forecasting for incentive programs more predictable.
- Maryland small and independent film producers: The statute creates a defined small/independent film category with lower in‑State spending thresholds (minimum $25,000 and 50% in‑State shooting) and a reserved portion of credits, improving access for smaller local productions.
- Businesses and taxpayers already located in enterprise zones before the statutory termination date: The bill preserves existing benefits for entities that locate in zones prior to the Enterprise Zone sunset, protecting previously made investment decisions and supporting continuance of those projects.
Who Bears the Cost
- Prospective enterprise zone applicants and expanding zone projects: New designations and many expansions will be limited when the $60 million trigger applies, reducing the pool of future zone‑based incentives available to developers and relocating employers.
- Large film productions and high‑cost projects: Per‑project and annual caps, and the $12 million carryforward ceiling, constrain the credit availability for large productions, raising after‑tax costs and potentially shifting location decisions away from Maryland for projects that need multi‑year or large annual credits.
- Licensed motor fuel dealers and distributors: Repeal of the 0.5% collection/handling discount removes a recurring small margin that helped offset tax‑collection compliance costs, raising net outlays for dealers unless operational adjustments are made.
- Owners/developers relying on sales/use exemptions: Firms that used the now‑repealed exemptions (concrete production equipment, certain telecom machinery, construction/warehousing equipment) will face higher up‑front sales tax costs and must reprice or re‑budget capital projects.
- Property owners expecting large enterprise‑zone property credits: The $500,000 per‑property cap reduces the maximum annual benefit available to large developments, potentially changing project financials and tax‑increment financing assumptions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is classic: protect the State’s fiscal capacity by limiting open‑ended tax incentive exposure, or preserve broad, flexible credits to attract and retain large economic projects. HB983 leans decisively toward fiscal certainty—placing administrative brakes, numeric caps, and sunsets on incentives—but in doing so it raises a trade‑off where reduced budgetary risk comes at the cost of reduced incentive predictability and potentially lower competitiveness for big projects that rely on multi‑year, high‑value credits.
HB983 intentionally trades expansionary tax policy for tighter fiscal discipline, but the operational mechanics create implementation risks. The $60 million trigger is phrased as what the Secretary “reasonably anticipates,” which places broad judgment in Commerce’s hands and could produce unpredictable moratoria on new designations—administratively efficient for caps, but legally and politically fraught for counties that have pipeline projects in review.
The first‑come, first‑served treatment of the enterprise wage credit plus the per‑entity and aggregate caps can create a race among applicants, raising fairness and allocation questions and potentially privileging well‑timed claims over highest‑impact projects.
On film credits, the combination of per‑project caps, an annual limit, and a constrained carryforward pool favors steady, smaller projects over blockbuster, multi‑year productions; that may be an explicit policy choice but will alter the State’s competitiveness for major shoots. The REIT dividend add‑back simplifies the State base by removing a federal deduction from Maryland calculations, but it raises compliance complexity for pass‑through entities and investors who must reconcile federal REIT treatment with Maryland additions.
Repealing narrow sales and fuel collection exemptions and reducing the tobacco import allowance are straightforward revenue raisers but will hit specific supply chains and low‑margin dealers unevenly. Finally, the bill contains many staggered effective dates and tax‑year‑based applicability rules that will require precise mapping by tax accountants and project sponsors to avoid unexpected exposure or missed claims.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.