LB900 amends Nebraska Revised Statutes section 77-1720 to recast how county sheriffs are compensated for distress warrants used to collect delinquent taxes. The bill reorganizes the fee and commission language, specifies mileage treatment under an existing statute, and eliminates the prior version of the section.
This is a technical but consequential change: it alters the mechanics by which collection costs are calculated, who is charged for them, and how those amounts flow through county accounting. County law enforcement, county treasurers, taxpayers with delinquent property taxes, and local fiscal officers should review the bill's mechanics to understand immediate operational and budgetary effects.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill rewrites section 77-1720 to set the fees sheriffs may charge when serving distress warrants, establishes a per-dollar commission schedule on sums collected by distress and sale, and ties mileage reimbursement to the mileage rate in section 33-117. It also addresses proration of mileage across multiple warrants and the accounting treatment when mileage is paid before collection.
Who It Affects
County sheriffs who serve distress warrants and calculate fees and commissions, county treasurers who collect and account for those amounts, and property owners subject to tax distress proceedings. County budgets and general funds are also implicated because of the bill's payment and credit provisions.
Why It Matters
By changing how collection costs are computed and routed, the bill shifts modest revenue between sheriffs, counties, and tax-delinquent property owners and may alter incentives around pursuing small tax claims. It also clarifies administrative steps — important for counties that front mileage or need to prorate multiple warrants — reducing ambiguity in accounting and billing.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
LB900 reorganizes the statute that governs how sheriffs are paid when they enforce distress warrants to collect unpaid taxes. Practically speaking, the sheriff's compensation for executing a warrant consists of three buckets: an issuing fee charged when a warrant is created, a levy fee charged when the sheriff levies on property, and mileage reimbursement for travel.
The statute also provides a commission on any taxes recovered through distress and sale; that commission is computed on a per-dollar basis and varies by the amount collected.
The bill makes explicit two administrative rules that often create operational questions. First, when a sheriff is holding multiple warrants for service, the statute requires charging mileage only for the actual miles necessarily traveled while serving all the warrants, and that mileage charge must be prorated across those warrants.
Second, if mileage is paid under the mileage statute before taxes are successfully collected, and those taxes are later collected, the amount paid as mileage is turned over to the county treasurer along with fees and commission and credited to the county's general fund. Those flow-of-funds provisions affect cash timing for sheriffs and county treasurers.In short, LB900 is primarily an operational rewrite: it defines how to calculate and allocate the discrete cost components tied to tax distress warrants and clarifies bookkeeping steps when payments occur in different sequences.
That clarity reduces room for inconsistent local practice but also fixes who ultimately bears these added collection charges — the parties against whom the distress warrants run — by continuing to permit those amounts to be added to the tax obligation and collected as part of the original tax.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill sets the issuing fee for each distress warrant at $22 and a separate levy fee of $1.
Mileage reimbursement is not a fixed number in this statute; LB900 directs mileage to be the rate provided in section 33-117 and requires prorating when one trip serves multiple warrants.
Commission on taxes collected by distress and sale is calculated per dollar: 10 cents per dollar on the portion up to $100 and 8 cents per dollar on any amount above $100.
All fees, mileage, and commissions are taxed to the party against whom the distress warrant runs and are collectible along with the original tax obligation.
If the county pays mileage under section 33-117 before collection and the tax is later collected, the mileage amount must be turned over to the county treasurer with fees and commissions and credited to the county general fund.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishes fees and references existing mileage statute
This provision lays out the fixed fees the sheriff may claim and removes ambiguity by pointing to section 33-117 for the mileage rate rather than restating a dollar-per-mile figure. Practically, counties must apply the mileage rate found in 33-117 whenever they calculate travel reimbursement for distress-warrant service, and that rate — which may change if section 33-117 is amended — now governs these tax-collection trips.
Sets a two-tier per-dollar commission schedule
The statute imposes a per-dollar commission on tax amounts collected by distress and sale: a higher per-dollar rate for the initial portion of the recovery (10¢ on each dollar up to $100) and a lower rate for the remainder (8¢ on each dollar above $100). This is a marginal-style schedule: collection of a sum larger than $100 will see the first $100 assessed at the 10¢ rate and only the excess at 8¢. Accountants and sheriffs' offices must implement this stepwise calculation when preparing charge statements.
Mileage proration and charge-back rules for multiple warrants
When a sheriff serves multiple warrants on one trip, the statute requires charging mileage only for the miles actually and necessarily traveled and then prorating that mileage among the served warrants. This prevents duplicate travel charges for separate—but jointly served—warrants, but it requires local offices to track per-warrant allocations of a single mileage charge and to produce prorated billing when presenting the tax bill.
Treatment of fees, mileage, commissions, and transfer to county treasury
All charges tied to distress warrants are assessed against the delinquent taxpayer and collected as part of the original tax. If mileage has already been paid under section 33-117 and the tax is later recovered, the prior mileage payment must be submitted to the county treasurer with the other fees and commissions and credited to the county general fund. That sequence affects county cash flow: sheriffs may front travel costs and later transfer collected amounts into county accounting.
Repeal of prior statutory text
The bill repeals the original version of section 77-1720 and replaces it with the amended text above. The repeal is a housekeeping step that ensures the amended provisions are the operative law without overlapping legacy language.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- County sheriffs: They receive a clearer, statutory fee schedule that defines the issuing and levy fees and codifies how to claim commissions and mileage, reducing ambiguity in billing and reimbursement.
- County treasurers and county governments: The bill clarifies the accounting treatment for mileage and fees (including the requirement to credit collected mileage to the general fund), which can standardize county bookkeeping and potentially increase recoveries deposited into county coffers.
- Local finance officers and auditors: Clear statutory rules around proration, per-dollar commission calculations, and the flow of funds reduce interpretive variability, simplifying audit trails and internal controls.
Who Bears the Cost
- Tax-delinquent property owners: The statute permits charging fees, mileage, and commissions back to the party against whom the distress warrant runs, increasing the total amount a delinquent taxpayer must pay to clear the debt.
- County sheriffs' offices (cash-flow exposure): Sheriffs or their offices may need to front mileage expenses (per section 33-117) and wait for reimbursement upon collection, creating temporary cash-flow pressure if collections lag.
- Small counties with limited administrative capacity: Implementing proration rules, marginal commission calculations, and transfers to the general fund increases bookkeeping complexity and could require software updates or staff training, raising administrative costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals — fairly compensating enforcement officers and clarifying county accounting — against the goal of minimizing additional financial burdens on taxpayers and avoiding perverse collection incentives; fixing fees and per-dollar commissions brings predictability but can either under- or over-compensate effort on small claims and shifts timing risks (fronting mileage) onto local agencies or taxpayers.
LB900 is primarily a clarifying and mechanical rewrite, but it creates a few practical tensions. First, replacing an open or ambiguous fee structure with fixed amounts and a stepwise commission schedule changes relative returns on collection effort: the marginal per-dollar commission structure treats the first $100 of recovery at one rate and the remainder at a lower rate, which could make efforts to collect very small delinquencies less attractive if administrative costs exceed expected commissions.
Second, tying mileage reimbursement to section 33-117 centralizes the mileage rate but exposes these collections to changes in that separate statute and creates dependency on the administrative practices that implement 33-117 across counties.
Implementation also raises modest administrative questions. Prorating mileage among multiple warrants requires per-warrant allocation logic; counties using legacy billing systems may need configuration work.
The rule that mileage paid first must later be handed to the county treasurer when collection occurs standardizes accounting but shifts temporary financial burden onto the sheriff's office or county until collection is realized. Finally, because the statute affixes these costs to the original tax as collectible charges, counties must ensure notice and documentation practices clearly inform taxpayers that collection costs will be added to their tax liability — lack of clear notice could generate disputes or challenges in particular cases.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.