H7636 lets any Rhode Island adult who is legally eligible to own firearms voluntarily ask to be barred from buying or possessing firearms by placing their name on either a 180‑day temporary list or an indefinite list. The Department of the Attorney General (BCI) maintains the lists; individuals enroll in person via local/state police or through a healthcare provider who verifies identity and forwards the form.
The bill ties short minimum waiting periods to removal requests (30 days for temporary, 90 days for indefinite), suspends concealed‑carry permits while a person is listed, requires destruction of files after removal or expiration, and creates a $25 civil fine for possessing a firearm while listed plus a misdemeanor for adding someone without their consent. The statute designs a privacy‑forward, time‑limited tool for people seeking to reduce their own access to firearms while imposing operational duties on law enforcement, the AG's office, and participating healthcare providers.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates two voluntary self‑exclusion lists maintained by the AG/BCI: a 180‑day temporary list and an indefinite list. Individuals enroll via local/state police or a healthcare provider who verifies identity; the AG must add entries within 24 hours and process removals promptly.
Who It Affects
Adults in Rhode Island who want to temporarily or permanently limit their firearm access, law enforcement agencies that accept and transmit forms, the Attorney General's BCI for list maintenance and NICS notifications on removals, and healthcare providers who may submit forms and attest to patient voluntariness.
Why It Matters
This creates a private, voluntary pathway for people worried about self‑harm to remove lawful access to firearms without triggering public records or permanent disability determinations. It also raises implementation questions for cross‑jurisdictional enforcement, recordkeeping, and the practical mechanics of suspending and restoring concealed‑carry permits.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill establishes two distinct voluntary self‑exclusion options. An adult who is not otherwise prohibited from firearms can ask to be placed on a temporary list that lasts up to 180 days (but from which the person may request removal after 30 days), or on an indefinite list that requires at least 90 days before the person can elect removal.
Enrollment requires a signed form with ID and contact information and an explicit acknowledgement of the consequences.
There are two enrollment paths: deliver the completed form personally to the local police department or Rhode Island State Police, which then forwards copies to the Attorney General's BCI; or have a healthcare provider submit the form electronically after verifying identity and obtaining a signed medical release. The AG/BCI must add verified enrollments to its restricted list within 24 hours.
If a concealed‑carry permit holder enrolls, the bill suspends the permit for the duration of the restriction and requires immediate reinstatement upon removal unless the permit is otherwise expired, revoked, or the person becomes legally ineligible.Removal can be requested by the individual (subject to the minimum waiting periods). Law enforcement must verify identity on removal forms, transmit them to the AG/BCI within 24 hours, and delete their local records within 24 hours.
The AG/BCI removes the person from its database and sends information about the removal to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. All records related to enrollment or removal are excluded from public records access and must be destroyed after removal or expiration of a temporary restriction.
The statute also creates a $25 civil fine for possessing a firearm while listed and makes it a misdemeanor to add someone to a list without their knowledge.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates two self‑exclusion pathways: a temporary list that lasts up to 180 days with removal permitted after 30 days, and an indefinite list with removal permitted after 90 days.
Individuals enroll by submitting a signed form with government ID either in person to local/state police (who forward it) or electronically via a healthcare provider who must verify identity and obtain a medical release.
The Attorney General/BCI must add verified enrollments to the restricted list within 24 hours; law enforcement and the AG/BCI must transmit and process removal requests within 24 hours as well.
All files related to enrollment and removal are exempt from public records and must be destroyed after removal or expiration; the AG/BCI notifies NICS when a person is removed from a restricted list.
Enrollees who hold concealed‑carry permits have those permits suspended while listed; possession of a firearm while on a list carries a $25 civil fine and adding someone without their knowledge is a misdemeanor.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Creates temporary and indefinite voluntary restriction lists
This section establishes the two enrollment categories and sets the minimum time before an enrollee may request removal (30 days for temporary, 90 days for indefinite). It clarifies automatic expiration for the temporary list at 180 days unless the individual requests to remain, and that indefinite entries remain until the individual asks for removal. Practically, this creates a choice architecture: a short, reversible lockout and a longer, more durable option for those seeking stronger limits.
Enrollment forms and verification channels
The AG must create standardized forms and make them available online and in paper. Enrollment can occur in person at local/state police (who forward copies to the AG) or through a healthcare provider who must verify identity, secure a signed medical release, and also sign an acknowledgement. The provider pathway transfers verification responsibility to clinicians and creates a formal role for healthcare actors in initiating legal restrictions on firearm access.
Processing timelines for inclusion and removal
The AG/BCI has 24 hours to add a verified enrollment; law enforcement has 24 hours to transmit removal requests to the AG/BCI, and must delete local records within 24 hours. The AG/BCI removes entries and notifies NICS upon removal. Those short deadlines are designed for rapid effect but require operational capacity across municipal police departments and the AG's office to meet the statutory timing.
Effect on concealed carry permits
Enrollment triggers suspension of any existing concealed‑carry permit for the duration of the restriction. Reinstatement is immediate upon removal unless the permit has lapsed or the enrollee has become legally prohibited from possessing firearms. This creates a direct administrative workflow between list maintenance and permit authorities.
Confidentiality, non‑use, and mandatory destruction of records
All enrollment and removal records are exempt from public‑records access and must be destroyed once the individual is removed or a temporary restriction expires. The bill also bars the AG and law enforcement from using inclusion/removal records in background checks or concealed‑carry applications. That combination prioritizes privacy but limits the state's ability to retain documentary history of enrollments.
Civil and criminal penalties
The statute creates a $25 civil fine for firearm possession by a person while on either list, to be assessed and collected by the AG, and makes it a misdemeanor to add or attempt to add someone to a list without their knowledge. The penalties are modest criminally and administratively; the design suggests the law is intended more as a safety tool than a punitive regime.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Justice across all five countries.
Explore Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts or seeking short‑term loss of access: the bill gives them a swift, private legal mechanism to remove their own access to firearms without court involvement.
- Families and household members seeking immediate risk‑reduction options: cohabitants can rely on an enrolled family member's voluntary restriction to decrease short‑term household firearm access.
- Healthcare providers who want an actionable clinical tool: clinicians gain a formal mechanism to help at‑risk patients reduce access, with an explicit verification/attestation role and a required medical release to facilitate enrollment.
Who Bears the Cost
- Attorney General's BCI and municipal law enforcement agencies: the bill imposes 24‑hour processing, data handling, destruction obligations, and NICS notification duties that will require staff time and technical work.
- Healthcare providers: clinicians who participate must verify ID, collect releases, sign acknowledgements, and manage potential liability and recordkeeping implications tied to referrals.
- Enrollees themselves: while seeking protection, enrollees face suspension of concealed‑carry rights and exposure to a civil fine (albeit small) if they possess a firearm while listed; they also assume responsibility for initiating and later requesting removal.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The law trades stronger individual privacy and voluntary self‑control (records destroyed, no public listing) against the need for reliable, enforceable cross‑jurisdictional restrictions: making self‑exclusion private and ephemeral respects autonomy and confidentiality but weakens the state's ability to detect, enforce, or study those restrictions, especially across state lines and federal background‑check systems.
The bill prioritizes privacy and voluntariness, but those priorities create operational and enforcement challenges. Requiring destruction of all records after removal or expiration makes long‑term auditing and research on use and outcomes difficult; it also raises practical evidentiary questions for enforcing the $25 fine—authorities must rely on contemporaneous proof while the enrollee remains listed because the statutory destruction rule eliminates later documentary trails.
Interstate and NICS interactions are underdefined. The statute instructs the AG/BCI to notify the National Instant Criminal Background Check System when someone is removed from the list, but it does not require reporting an individual's addition to NICS or other interstate systems.
That asymmetric reporting could produce gaps: an enrollee might remain visible to private parties or retailers in some systems but not others, and persons can still attempt to purchase firearms out of state where laws differ. Finally, assigning identity‑verification duties to healthcare providers creates clinical workflow and liability questions—clinicians must balance patient privacy, coercion risk, and administrative burdens without explicit funding or malpractice safe harbors in the bill.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.