SB65 amends South Dakota Retirement System distribution rules to differentiate deaths occurring on or before December 31, 2021 from those occurring after that date. For pre-2022 deaths the statute preserves the older framework (surviving spouse receives lifetime payments; absent a spouse, a five-year lump sum to a designated beneficiary).
For deaths after December 31, 2021, the bill adopts the SECURE Act’s 10‑year distribution rule, while carving out life‑expectancy (stretch) treatment for so‑called "eligible designated beneficiaries" and specifying how minors, spouses, disabled and chronically ill beneficiaries, and near‑age contemporaries are treated.
The change matters because it rewrites timing and tax-recognition obligations for beneficiaries of the state pension. The new text clarifies several mechanics — deadline triggers, surviving‑spouse election treatment, and the point at which a minor child’s special status ends — but it also delegates interpretive detail to federal SECURE Act guidance, creating implementation work for plan administrators and financial advisers who must track beneficiary categories and election windows precisely.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill keeps the old five‑year or lifetime spousal rules for participants who died on or before 12/31/2021, and for deaths after that date installs a 10‑year distribution deadline subject to exceptions for eligible designated beneficiaries who may use life‑expectancy payouts. It authorizes special timing for surviving spouses and sets rules for when a minor child’s special status ends and the 10‑year clock thereafter.
Who It Affects
Primary affected parties are beneficiaries of the South Dakota Retirement System — surviving spouses, designated beneficiaries (including minors, disabled and chronically ill persons), and the System’s administrators and staff responsible for processing elections and tracking beneficiary status. Tax and financial advisors who counsel beneficiaries will also face new timing and planning requirements.
Why It Matters
The bill updates state law to match federal post‑SECURE Act distribution constraints, changing when beneficiaries recognize taxable income and when plan assets must be paid out. That matters for estate planning, tax timing, actuarial projections, and the operational workload of the retirement system.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB65 creates a simple bifurcation based on the date of the participant’s death. If the participant died on or before December 31, 2021, the prior rules remain in place: a surviving spouse can receive benefits for life beginning promptly after death; if there is no surviving spouse the designated beneficiary receives a lump‑sum distribution within five years.
Those rules are left intact in the amended sections.
For participant deaths after December 31, 2021, the bill imposes the SECURE Act–style 10‑year rule: absent an eligible designated beneficiary, the plan must distribute the entire account by the end of the calendar year that contains the tenth anniversary of the participant’s death. The statute expressly allows a category of beneficiaries to opt for life‑expectancy payouts instead of the 10‑year election; if they do not elect, the default is the 10‑year payout.
The text defers to federal regulations and guidance for detailed implementation where applicable.The measure defines "eligible designated beneficiary" narrowly to include six categories: a surviving spouse; a child who has not reached the age of majority (but who loses the special status when reaching majority, at which point the ten‑year countdown is reset to the child’s majority date); an individual who meets the Internal Revenue Code definition of disabled; an individual who is chronically ill under the IRC definition (subject to a certification requirement about the expected duration); and any person who is no more than ten years younger than the participant. The bill also treats distributions required under incidental death benefit rules of IRC section 401(a) as satisfying these state distribution requirements.Practically, SB65 requires the retirement system to process beneficiary elections, verify eligible‑beneficiary status (including chronic‑illness certifications), and apply different distribution deadlines depending on beneficiary type and timing.
That shifts substantive tax‑timing choices to beneficiaries while obligating plan staff to maintain more granular beneficiary records and to follow SECURE Act guidance as it evolves.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill preserves the pre‑2022 regime for deaths on or before December 31, 2021: surviving spouses receive lifetime payouts; absent a spouse, a designated beneficiary must receive a lump sum within five years.
For deaths after December 31, 2021 the statute requires the entire account to be distributed by Dec. 31 of the calendar year containing the tenth anniversary of the participant’s death unless an eligible designated beneficiary elects life‑expectancy payouts.
Eligible designated beneficiaries who can choose life‑expectancy treatment include the surviving spouse, a child until majority (with the 10‑year clock restarting at the child’s majority), disabled persons, chronically ill persons (with certification), and anyone no more than ten years younger than the participant.
If the eligible designated beneficiary is a surviving spouse, required payments can be delayed until the later of Dec. 31 of the year after death or Dec. 31 of the year the participant would have reached age 70½ (or age 72 for participants subject to the later RMD age), aligning timing with federal RMD rules.
If there is no designated beneficiary and distributions had not begun at death, the plan must distribute the account by Dec. 31 of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of the participant’s death; incidental death benefit distributions under IRC section 401(a) count as satisfying the statute.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Keeps pre-2022 death rules: surviving spouse lifetime or five‑year lump sum
This amendment reiterates the old distribution regime for participants who died on or before December 31, 2021. The surviving spouse must receive benefits over his or her lifetime starting as soon as administratively possible, and if there is no surviving spouse the designated beneficiary must receive a lump‑sum payment within five years of death. For administrators, this section maintains established processes for legacy cases and signals that the law will not retroactively subject those deaths to the newer SECURE Act‑style rules.
Adopts SECURE Act‑style 10‑year rule for post‑2021 deaths with eligible‑beneficiary exceptions
This is the operative modernization: for any participant who dies after December 31, 2021, the plan must generally distribute the account by the end of the calendar year containing the tenth anniversary of death. The section also creates the eligible designated beneficiary category and allows those beneficiaries to elect either the 10‑year payout or life‑expectancy distributions. It contains special timing for surviving spouses — delaying required payments until the later of the year after death or the year the participant would have reached the prior required‑beginning age — and addresses what happens if an eligible beneficiary dies or a minor reaches majority during the payout period (the 10‑year deadline then governs). The text repeatedly references federal SECURE Act guidance for details, making federal interpretation central to state compliance.
Parallel retention of older rules for another plan code section
This amendment mirrors Section 1 but applies to the parallel statutory provision in chapter 3‑13A. It preserves lifetime spousal payouts and the five‑year lump‑sum fallback for deaths on or before December 31, 2021 under this separate plan chapter. The duplication indicates the retirement system operates multiple code sections that must remain consistent for legacy deaths.
Parallel application of post‑2021 rules in the companion provision
Like Section 2, this provision applies the 10‑year distribution rule and eligible designated beneficiary exceptions to the chapter 3‑13A counterpart. It repeats the same mechanics — deadlines, spouse deferral language, treatment of minors, disabled and chronically ill beneficiaries, and reliance on federal guidance — ensuring the revised regime is uniform across the system's statutory framework.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Surviving spouses: retain the option for lifetime payouts and receive special timing protection that can delay taxable distributions until the later statutorily specified date, preserving planning flexibility.
- Disabled and chronically ill designated beneficiaries: qualify as "eligible designated beneficiaries," giving them the ability to spread distributions over life expectancy rather than being accelerated into a 10‑year payout.
- Minor children of participants: receive temporary protection (life‑expectancy or delayed treatment) until reaching majority, at which point the statute restarts the 10‑year distribution clock from the date of majority rather than from the original death date.
- South Dakota Retirement System administrators: gain a statutory framework aligned with federal law that clarifies many election options and deadlines, reducing legal ambiguity (though increasing operational work).
Who Bears the Cost
- Plan administrators and recordkeeping staff: must track beneficiary categories, ages, certifications (for chronic illness), election windows, and multiple deadline triggers, increasing administrative complexity and potential operational costs.
- Non‑designated heirs and residual beneficiaries: where beneficiaries are not categorized as eligible, assets may need to be paid within ten years (or five years if no beneficiary), accelerating tax recognition and potentially raising tax burdens compared with pre‑SECURE stretch outcomes.
- Financial and tax advisors: face greater compliance and planning burdens as clients must make timely elections and certify status; advisers will need to model different timing scenarios and advise on irrevocable tax consequences.
- The retirement system (as plan sponsor): may face implementation costs to update forms, systems, and communications and to coordinate with federal guidance; moreover, errors in administering elections could create liability or require corrective distributions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing the fiscal and policy goal of accelerating benefit payout (and limiting lifetime stretch distributions) against the competing objective of preserving lifetime‑oriented protections for vulnerable beneficiaries (spouses, disabled, chronically ill, and minor children). SB65 attempts to thread that needle by adopting the 10‑year rule broadly but carving out life‑expectancy options for narrowly defined eligible beneficiaries; however, that compromise shifts complexity and timing risk onto beneficiaries and plan administrators.
SB65 aligns state distribution rules with the federal SECURE Act framework but relies explicitly on federal regulations and guidance for interpretive details. That delegation reduces the need to replicate complex tax rules in state statute but creates operational dependence on evolving federal guidance; administrators must monitor IRS guidance and adapt plan procedures accordingly.
The bill’s chronic‑illness carve‑out requires certification of expected indefinite and lengthy inability, which raises questions about who provides the certification, acceptable standards of proof, and how contemporaneous changes in medical status affect previously made elections.
Several implementation ambiguities remain. The statute references differing RMD ages (70½ versus 72) depending on when a participant would have reached the prior threshold, echoing federal transitions but inviting interpretive issues for participants born on the cusp or for distributions that began prior to death.
The treatment of contingent or multiple designated beneficiaries (for example, contingent vs primary beneficiaries, per stirpes designations, and trust beneficiaries) is not spelled out; plan administrators will need to establish clear operational rules for dividing accounts and determining which beneficiary’s status governs the distribution schedule. Finally, the restart of the 10‑year clock when a minor reaches majority creates administrative timing traps — different states and plans define majority differently, and the bill does not standardize the triggering date beyond "age of majority," which may require internal policy decisions or reliance on other statutory definitions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.