The bill adds a new section to the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act establishing a competitive grant program administered by the Secretary of Labor (in consultation with Education) to expand training, education, and outreach for careers in the residential construction industry. Grants go to junior/community colleges, area career and technical education schools, and certain WIOA training providers and may run up to four years.
The program prioritizes rural areas and underserved populations and mandates specific allowable uses—ranging from carpentry and HVAC to construction management and surveying—while requiring grantees to document partnerships, anticipated credential outcomes, and plans for sustaining activities after grant funds end. It also includes attestations on labor-law compliance and annual performance reporting requirements, with an authorization of $20 million per year for fiscal years 2026–2030.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a competitive grant program under WIOA to expand capacity at community colleges, area CTE schools, and approved training providers to deliver residential construction training and outreach. Grants are up to four years and fund both new programs and incumbent-worker upskilling.
Who It Affects
Junior and community colleges, area career and technical education schools, WIOA-recognized training providers, residential construction employers and developers, rural communities, opportunity youth, and underserved populations (including veterans and low-income individuals).
Why It Matters
The legislation ties workforce development directly to housing supply by prioritizing construction trades and requiring grantees to report expected impacts on affordable housing. It also conditions federal support on partner wage/benefit standards and labor-law attestations—shaping what public-private training partnerships will look like on the ground.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The CONSTRUCTS Act inserts a new Section 172 into WIOA establishing a grant program to grow the pipeline of workers for residential construction. The Labor Department, working with Education, will run a competitive process that funds community and technical colleges, career and technical schools, and WIOA training providers to create or expand programs that teach skills used in homebuilding and related trades.
Grants may support credentialed pathways, outreach into K–12, and incumbent-worker training.
Applicants must describe the training or outreach they will add or expand, identify the populations they will serve (for example, rural residents, opportunity youth, or veterans), show partnerships with local employers or apprenticeship sponsors, and set out measurable outcomes tied to WIOA’s performance indicators. The bill requires grantees to explain how programming will increase affordable housing supply and to include plans for sustaining activities after grant funding ends.Use-of-funds rules distinguish required activities—such as building evidence-based programs in named trades and creating employer partnerships—from permissive ones like hiring technical instructors, operating clinics in underserved areas, developing promotional materials, or awarding scholarships.
Grantees must offer flexible delivery (night classes, part-time, online) and provide job-search supports on program completion.The bill embeds accountability: grantees must attest to compliance with relevant federal, state, and local labor laws and to have no pending labor-law enforcement actions, submit initial outcome reports within 18 months and annually thereafter, and the Secretary must compile and send a summary to the relevant congressional committees. Congress authorized $20 million annually for FY2026–2030 to carry out the program.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Secretary of Labor will award competitive grants (maximum duration: 4 years) to junior/community colleges, area career and technical education schools, and WIOA training providers to expand residential construction training.
Grantees must use funds for evidence-based programs teaching specified trades (carpentry, framing, masonry, welding, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, construction math, surveying, equipment operation, etc.) and for incumbent-worker upskilling.
Priority in grant awards goes to projects serving rural areas or underserved populations (defined by Census employment disparities, low income, barriers to employment, or veteran status).
Recipients and their partners must attest they comply with federal, state, and local labor laws and have no pending labor-law enforcement actions before receiving funds.
Congress authorized $20,000,000 per year for fiscal years 2026–2030 to implement the program and requires grantees to report outcomes tied to WIOA’s primary performance indicators within 18 months and annually.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Names the statute the 'Creating Opportunities for New Skills Training at Rural or Underserved Colleges and Trade Schools Act of 2025' or the 'CONSTRUCTS Act of 2025.' This is purely stylistic but signals congressional intent to frame the program around rural and underserved institutions.
Key definitions
Defines terms that matter for eligibility and priority: 'incumbent worker' (cross-references DOL regulation), 'junior or community college' (HEA cross-reference), 'rural area' (nonmetropolitan or Housing Act of 1949 definition), and 'underserved population' (uses Census employment comparisons and categories such as low income, barriers to employment, and veterans). These definitions shape who counts for priority treatment and who may be served by programs.
Program creation, grant authority, and eligible entities
Authorizes the Secretary of Labor, consulting the Secretary of Education, to run a competitive grant program to expand training capacity for residential construction careers. Eligible applicants are community/junior colleges, area career and technical education schools, and providers described in WIOA section 122(a)(2) (i.e., recognized training providers). Grants may not exceed four years in duration, setting a medium-term funding window for program development.
Application requirements and selection priorities
Applications must detail the new or expanded programming, alignment with existing offerings, staffing, target populations (incumbent workers, rural residents, opportunity youth, in-school youth, underserved groups), partnerships, anticipated credential and performance outcomes, and a timetable aligned with WIOA indicators. The Secretary gives priority to proposals serving rural areas or underserved populations—an explicit selection lever to direct federal funds where capacity is thinner.
Permitted and required uses; delivery expectations
The statute specifies required uses (creating/expanding evidence-based programs across a long list of construction trades and incumbent-worker training) and permissive uses (hiring technical instructors, operating rural training clinics, promotion, and scholarships). It also requires flexible scheduling, online or night options, and job-search supports upon completion—practical design elements aimed at retention and placement of participants.
Labor-law attestations and performance reporting
Recipients and their partners must attest to compliance with federal, state, and local labor laws and declare no pending enforcement actions by DOL, FLRA, EEOC, or NLRB—an administrative precondition for participation. Grantees must report outcomes on WIOA’s primary indicators within 18 months and annually, and the Secretary must compile these reports for the House and Senate committees that oversee labor and education.
Funding authorization and statutory placement
Authorizes $20 million per year for FY2026–2030 to carry out the new section and adjusts WIOA’s table of contents to reflect the insertion of Section 172. The appropriation is a program-level authorization; actual funding requires subsequent appropriations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Rural and underserved community/junior colleges: receive dedicated competitive grants to build or expand construction trades programs, recruit technical faculty, and set up rural training clinics—resources that directly raise local training capacity.
- Opportunity youth and underserved populations (including veterans and low-income individuals): targeted for outreach and priority-serving programs, plus scholarships and flexible schedules that reduce barriers to participation and completion.
- Residential construction firms and developers in grant areas: gain access to a pipeline of credentialed, locally trained workers and partners for apprenticeships or hiring, potentially reducing recruitment and training costs.
- Incumbent construction workers: programs explicitly fund upskilling so existing workers can obtain recognized postsecondary credentials or certifications to advance careers.
- K–12 career and technical education programs: benefit from grant-funded dual/concurrent enrollment pathways and outreach designed to funnel students into construction careers earlier.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Labor (administration): responsible for designing the competition, vetting attestation claims, monitoring performance reporting, and compiling congressional reports—administrative burden that consumes agency personnel and grant-management resources.
- Local colleges and training providers: must design sustainable post-grant plans, provide matching or in-kind support in practice, and absorb reporting and compliance duties; smaller institutions may struggle to meet fiduciary and reporting standards.
- Employer partners and developers: must provide fair wages/benefits commensurate with local packages and sign attestation-style partnerships, which could limit partnership options or raise employer labor costs if local pay is high.
- Congressional appropriations: the $20M/year authorization creates a modest funding expectation that, if expanded by appropriators, increases federal outlays; otherwise, grantees face a constrained funding pool.
- Entities with past labor-law violations: effectively excluded until outstanding enforcement matters are resolved, limiting collaboration options for grantees with local contractors who have compliance histories.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between rapidly scaling accessible, credentialed construction training in places that lack it and preserving program quality, fair labor standards, and long-term sustainability: the bill pushes federal dollars to underserved areas and ties support to wage and labor-law conditions, but limited funding, vague wage standards, and strict attestations risk either producing shallow, short-lived training or excluding employer partners the programs most need.
The bill establishes clear policy goals—grow training capacity and link workforce development to housing supply—but implementation will test those goals against several constraints. First, the authorized funding level ($20 million per year) is small relative to national postsecondary and workforce needs; awarding meaningful multi-year grants across many rural areas may dilute per-site funding, forcing trade-offs between breadth and depth.
Second, the requirement that partners provide 'fair wages and benefits commensurate with local packages' plus labor-law attestations is purposeful but administratively blunt: the statute does not define 'commensurate' or set enforcement steps beyond the attestation, leaving DOL to operationalize these standards and manage disputes.
Third, the program emphasizes credentials and short-term outcomes tied to WIOA performance indicators, which can drive institutions toward programs that maximize measurable placement rates rather than longer apprenticeships or employer-integrated pathways that take more time but yield deeper skills. The sustainability expectation—requiring grantees to outline post-grant plans—will be difficult for colleges that lack local employer capacity or long-term funding, raising the risk of ephemeral programs that vanish after funding ends.
Finally, the definitions of 'underserved population' rely on Census employment shares and various categorical tests; applying those definitions at the program level may complicate project design and selection, particularly in mixed urban-rural districts or in areas with incomplete labor-market data.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.