This bill authorizes the President to impose targeted sanctions on foreign persons representing governments that reject a U.S. request to grant humanitarian entry to Palestinians from Gaza. It requires the President to produce a list of such foreign representatives, allows blocking of property under IEEPA, and makes listed individuals inadmissible to the United States with immediate revocation of existing visas.
Beyond individual measures, the bill lets the President suspend a country’s Major Non‑NATO Ally (MNNA) designation and ‘‘any and all’’ foreign assistance — including security assistance — if that country’s government declines the U.S. request. The Act excludes Israel explicitly, contains limited national‑security exemptions and a presidential waiver process with recurring classified reporting, and sunsets after five years.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires the President to submit a list of foreign government representatives who rejected U.S. requests to admit Palestinians from Gaza, and authorizes blocking of their U.S. property, visa inadmissibility and revocation, and application of IEEPA penalties. It also permits suspension of MNNA status and all foreign assistance to non‑cooperating countries.
Who It Affects
Direct targets are foreign persons charged with representing foreign governments in the Middle East (excluding Israel) and the governments that employ them. U.S. diplomatic, immigration, and sanctions‑enforcement agencies will implement the measures; Congress receives oversight via required submissions and reports.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a new statutory tool tying humanitarian admission cooperation to sanctions and aid conditionality, expanding the routine use of IEEPA and visa authorities for diplomatic leverage. That combination could change bargaining dynamics with regional states and shift operational burdens to U.S. agencies managing sanctions, immigration revocations, and congressional reporting.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Within 60 days of enactment the President must give Congress an unclassified list (with an optional classified annex) naming foreign government representatives who rejected U.S. requests to permit humanitarian entry for Palestinians from Gaza. The President must update that list at 180 days and annually for five years or sooner if new information arrives.
For each person on the list the President may use IEEPA blocking powers to freeze assets and prohibit transactions that are in, enter, or are under the control of U.S. persons. The bill explicitly waives the section 202 requirement of IEEPA (the presidential declaration of national emergency) for this purpose, and it ties violations of implementing regulations to the civil and criminal penalties available under IEEPA.The Act makes listed individuals inadmissible to the United States, bars them from receiving visas or other travel documentation, and automatically revokes any existing visas or entry documents.
It also authorizes the President to suspend a country’s MNNA designation and to suspend ‘‘any and all’’ forms of U.S. foreign assistance — including security assistance — when the country’s government has declined the request to admit Palestinians.The bill builds in two kinds of carve‑outs and controls: first, it exempts activities covered by Title V reporting obligations under the National Security Act of 1947 and U.S. intelligence or authorized law‑enforcement operations from sanctions; second, it gives the President a case‑by‑case waiver power. If the President uses a waiver, the statute requires a classified report to the named congressional committees every 120 days after the initial imposition of sanctions until the statutory authority terminates in five years.
The Act also clarifies that its provisions do not apply to Israel or Israeli nationals.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The President must submit the first list of non‑cooperating foreign government representatives to the House Foreign Affairs and Senate Foreign Relations Committees within 60 days of enactment.
The list must be updated at 180 days and then annually for five years, with the option to provide updates sooner if new information arises, and it must be submitted in unclassified form (a classified annex is permitted).
The bill authorizes blocking of property using IEEPA authorities but specifies that the usual section 202 declaration requirement of IEEPA does not apply for these actions.
Any listed foreign person is made inadmissible and ineligible for visas, and the bill requires immediate revocation of any current visas or entry documents, automatically canceling other valid documentation in the person’s possession.
Section 3 allows the President to suspend Major Non‑NATO Ally status and ‘‘any and all’’ foreign assistance, including security assistance, to countries that decline the U.S. request to admit Palestinians from Gaza.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title and stated purpose
Gives the Act the short title ‘‘Make Gaza Great Again Act’’ and states its purpose: to secure cooperation from Middle Eastern states (explicitly excluding Israel) to offer humanitarian entry to Palestinians from Gaza. This frames the statute as a narrowly focused conditionality tool tied to a specific policy objective rather than a general sanctions statute.
Authority to impose sanctions and list requirement
Authorizes the President to impose sanctions on foreign persons appearing on the administration’s list and requires delivery of the initial list to the two named congressional committees within 60 days. The initial‑list requirement creates a procedural trigger for the administration to identify targets and starts the statutory clock for subsequent reporting and updates. The section also permits an unclassified submission with a classified annex, which affects how much oversight can be public.
Sanctions mechanics and penalties
Specifies the sanctions: exercise of IEEPA blocking powers (with the section 202 declaration requirement waived for this purpose), and immigration measures that render listed persons inadmissible and mandate immediate visa revocation. It cross‑applies IEEPA’s criminal and civil penalties for violations of implementing regulations, making penalties available to enforce secondary compliance by U.S. persons or entities subject to the sanctions rules.
Exemptions, waiver, reporting, and sunset
Creates narrow exemptions for activities covered by Title V National Security Act reporting and for authorized intelligence or law‑enforcement activities. Grants the President a case‑by‑case waiver capability if in the national interest, but conditions waiver use on submission of classified reports to Congress every 120 days after sanctions are imposed. Finally, the authority to impose sanctions expires five years after enactment, limiting the statute’s longevity while allowing multi‑year use.
Suspension of MNNA designation and foreign assistance
Gives the President discretion to suspend a country’s Major Non‑NATO Ally designation under section 517(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and to suspend any and all forms of foreign assistance, explicitly including security assistance, to governments that decline U.S. requests to offer humanitarian entry to Palestinians. The President may terminate such suspensions by written notice to the congressional committees named in the Act.
Rule of construction excluding Israel
States that nothing in the Act applies to Israel or Israeli nationals. That carve‑out removes Israel from the statute’s reach and is structurally important: targets are limited to other Middle Eastern states and their representatives.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Foreign Affairs across all five countries.
Explore Foreign Affairs in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Palestinians from Gaza seeking humanitarian entry — the statute creates a new U.S. lever aimed at expanding third‑country entry pathways that could increase relocation or transit options if states comply.
- U.S. negotiators and policymakers — the law adds a statutory coercive tool combining sanctions, immigration measures, and aid suspension to extract cooperation on humanitarian admissions.
- Humanitarian NGOs and service providers — if the statute induces additional admission pathways, NGOs could gain expanded legal routes for transporting or resettling vulnerable populations and clearer U.S. policy support for such movements.
Who Bears the Cost
- Foreign governments that decline U.S. requests — they risk designation of their representatives, asset blocking, visa restrictions for officials, and suspension of MNNA status and all U.S. assistance, including security aid.
- U.S. executive‑branch agencies — Treasury (OFAC), State (visa adjudication and diplomatic engagement), and USAID/DoD (managing aid suspensions and consequences) must allocate personnel and legal resources to implement sanctions, process lists, manage waivers, and handle classified reporting.
- U.S. diplomatic relationships and coalition efforts — conditioning humanitarian admission on sanctions and aid suspension may complicate regional diplomacy, burden multilateral negotiations, and provoke reciprocal actions or reduced cooperation in other policy areas.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between enforcing humanitarian goals through coercive state‑level penalties and preserving diplomatic relationships and state sovereignty: the bill strengthens U.S. leverage by combining IEEPA, visa bans, and aid suspension, but that same coercive mix can undermine cooperation, provoke retaliation, and create practical and legal disputes about who counts as a target and what constitutes refusal to cooperate.
The statute leaves several operational ambiguities that could slow or complicate implementation. It does not define key terms such as who counts as a ‘‘foreign person charged with representation of a foreign government’’ (career diplomats, foreign ministers, embassy staff, or named political appointees?), nor does it define the standard for when a government has ‘‘rejected a request’’ — a formal diplomatic note, an implicit refusal, or failure to act within a particular time.
These gaps create room for disagreement between the administration and targeted governments and for legal challenges about arbitrariness or lack of notice.
The bill relies heavily on IEEPA and immigration authorities as diplomatic leverage. Using economic‑power tools alongside visa revocations and suspension of security assistance can be effective, but it also risks unintended consequences: targets may retaliate, reduce cooperation on unrelated security matters, or move affected individuals and assets outside U.S. jurisdiction, blunting the measures.
The requirement that waiver reporting be classified limits public congressional scrutiny of how broadly the President uses exceptions, even as the statute requires periodic classified reports—raising a trade‑off between operational secrecy and accountability. Finally, the explicit exclusion of Israel narrows the statute politically and legally but may fuel perceptions of uneven application among regional actors and humanitarian groups, affecting buy‑in for the policy objective.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.