The Gambling Addiction Recovery, Investment, and Treatment Act would authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award formula grants to states to address gambling addiction. The funding allocation mirrors how block grants for substance abuse prevention and treatment are distributed under existing law, with funds reshuffled to other states if a recipient does not apply.
The bill also authorizes grants through the National Institute on Drug Abuse to support gambling addiction research and requires a report to Congress on program effectiveness within three years of enactment. It further establishes an appropriations framework, tying funding to a percentage of the Treasury-estimated tax receipts from the prior year for two distinct purposes: 37.5% for SAMHSA grants and 12.5% for NIDA research.
At a Glance
What It Does
SAMHSA must award state grants to address gambling addiction, distributed using the same ratios as the major substance abuse block grants, with reallocation if a state does not apply. NIDA may grant research funds on gambling addiction. A Congress-wide effectiveness report is due within three years.
Who It Affects
State health departments and publicly funded treatment programs will implement these grants; researchers at NIDA and partner institutions will conduct related studies; states must manage grant administration and reporting.
Why It Matters
Creates a dedicated, formula-driven funding stream for gambling addiction treatment and research, expanding federal support beyond treatment to include targeted research and program evaluation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act would give federal money to states to help them fund programs that treat gambling problems and support prevention efforts. States would receive grants in amounts determined by a formula that aligns with how other substance abuse grants are distributed, and if a state doesn’t apply for a grant, its share would be redistributed among applying states.
In addition, the bill authorizes the National Institute on Drug Abuse to fund gambling addiction research. The Secretary of Health and Human Services would report to Congress on how effective these programs have been within three years of enactment.
Finally, the bill sets up a long-term funding mechanism that ties annual appropriations to a share of tax receipts from the previous year, split between SAMHSA grants and NIDA research. This structure creates predictable funding for state programs while inviting ongoing evaluation of outcomes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates formula grants to states to address gambling addiction.
Funding mirrors existing substance abuse block grant distribution, with reallocations to non-applying states.
NIDA is authorized to fund gambling addiction research.
A Congress-mandated report on program effectiveness is due within three years.
Appropriations are tied to percentages of prior-year tax receipts (37.5% to SAMHSA, 12.5% to NIDA) through 2034.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This act may be cited as the Gambling Addiction Recovery, Investment, and Treatment Act. It establishes the legislative name by which the measure will be known and referenced in subsequent sections.
Grants to States to address gambling addiction
The Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use shall award formula grants to states to address gambling addiction. The distribution of funds follows the same ratios used for the block grants for substance abuse prevention and treatment under subpart II of part B of title XIX of the Public Health Service Act. If a state does not apply for a grant for a given fiscal year, the amount would be reallocated among applying states in proportion to their allotments under the formula.
Grants for gambling addiction research
The Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse may award grants to support research on gambling addiction. This provision recognizes gambling disorder as an area warranting dedicated study alongside other substance-related conditions.
Reporting on effectiveness
Not later than three years after enactment, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall submit to Congress a report evaluating the effectiveness of the programs and activities carried out under subsections (a) and (b). The report will summarize outcomes and inform future policy and funding decisions.
Authorization of appropriations
For each fiscal year from 2025 through 2034, the act authorizes appropriations to carry out subsection (a) and subsection (b). The amounts are tied to 37.5 percent and 12.5 percent, respectively, of the amount the Secretary estimates as the Taxes received under section 4401(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 in the preceding fiscal year. This creates a predictable, formula-driven funding path for both grants and research.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State health departments and their public treatment networks, which gain predictable funding to implement gambling addiction programs.
- Researchers and institutions supported by NIDA who study gambling addiction and related outcomes.
- State-level policymakers and public health agencies responsible for substance use and behavioral health programming, who will coordinate funds with existing grants.
- Patients and families affected by gambling disorders, who should see expanded treatment and support options.
Who Bears the Cost
- The federal government bears the cost of the appropriations, funded through the Treasury’s tax receipts before allocation.
- States that fail to apply for grants may see their potential allocations redirected, potentially reducing opportunities for program implementation in those jurisdictions.
- State agencies must build capacity to administer new grant requirements, monitor outcomes, and report on performance.
- Grantees may face administrative overhead and reporting burdens associated with federal grant management.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between predictable federal funding tied to prior-year tax receipts and the need for flexible, outcome-driven investment in gambling addiction programs across diverse state contexts. Balancing formula-based distributions with equitable access for states of varying size and capacity, while ensuring rigorous evaluation, presents a policy trade-off between stability and responsiveness.
The bill creates a structured funding mechanism that relies on tax-receipt projections to determine annual appropriations, which could introduce volatility if revenue estimates shift. Because funds are allocated in proportion to existing block grant formulas, states with more developed prevention and treatment infrastructures may historically benefit from larger shares, potentially widening gaps for smaller or rural states unless they apply for grants.
The requirement to reallocate unclaimed funds to other states is straightforward, but it concentrates opportunity for those actively applying, which could influence state grant-seeking behavior. The act also relies on the accuracy and timeliness of reporting to Congress, which will be critical to assessing whether gambling addiction programs achieve intended outcomes.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.