HB1168 directs the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to require nonprofit entities that receive federal funds to certify compliance with federal law related to human trafficking, alien smuggling, fraud, bribery, and gratuity, and to verify they have not been convicted under INA 274. The act establishes a two-track approach: new recipients must certify before future federal awards, and current or prior recipients must certify within 60 days of enactment or repay awarded funds if noncompliant.
In addition, the bill adds a tax-exemption provision that denies 501(c)(3) status to organizations that fail to certify or are found to violate INA 274. It also directs DHS to create a guidance and reporting framework, and the Comptroller General to monitor and report violations.
Finally, the act clarifies applicability to any nonprofit entity with current or future federal funding and envisions ongoing government oversight.
At a Glance
What It Does
Future federal awards to nonprofit entities require a certification of compliance with trafficking laws and no INA 274 convictions. Current recipients must certify within 60 days of enactment and may owe repayment if noncompliant.
Who It Affects
Nonprofit organizations receiving federal funds, including those with existing awards, and 501(c)(3) entities that may lose tax-exempt status if they fail to certify or are found in violation.
Why It Matters
Creates a centralized, auditable standard tying funding and tax status to anti-trafficking compliance, expanding both oversight and potential penalties for noncompliance.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a government-wide certification regime tied to federal funding for nonprofits. It requires the Office of Management and Budget to establish a certification process that nonprofits must meet before obtaining future federal funds and mandates that those already funded certify their compliance within a defined period after enactment.
The certification assesses adherence to federal anti-trafficking and alien smuggling laws, plus related fraud and bribery prohibitions, including the prohibition in INA 274. If a recipient fails to certify or is found in violation, it may be required to repay funds.
In addition, HB1168 amends tax law to deny tax-exempt status to organizations that do not submit the required certification or are found to have violated INA 274, with a provision allowing reapplication for exemption after at least a year. The bill also requires the Department of Homeland Security to publish guidelines for non-profits to comply and to improve cooperation with law enforcement and other agencies.
Finally, the Comptroller General would annually report on violations by non-profits and provide Congress with a snapshot of enforcement outcomes. The act applies to any nonprofit entity that currently has or will have a relationship with federal funding.
Taken together, the measure creates a formal compliance backbone for federal funding, pairs funding with verification, and links non-profit tax status to transparency around trafficking and smuggling violations. While it strengthens enforcement, it also raises questions about implementation cost, the accuracy of certifications, and potential chilling effects on legitimate nonprofits.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires new federal awards to nonprofits to include a certification of compliance with trafficking laws and INA 274.
Current recipients must certify within 60 days of enactment or repay funds if noncompliant.
Nonprofits that fail to certify or violate INA 274 can be denied tax-exempt status (Section 503(g)).
DHS must publish a compliance guide and improve cooperation with law enforcement.
The Comptroller General must report violations within 180 days and annually thereafter.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the act as the Protecting Federal Funds from Human Trafficking and Smuggling Act of 2025, setting the name for reference in future appropriation and enforcement actions.
Future funding certification
Requires that beginning no later than 120 days after enactment, no federal funds may be awarded to a nonprofit unless it submits a certification that it is in compliance with federal law relating to human trafficking, alien smuggling, fraud, bribery, or gratuity, and has not been convicted under INA 274 (8 U.S.C. 1324). This creates a gatekeeping step before new awards are issued.
Existing and prior recipients certification
Within 60 days after enactment, nonprofits currently receiving federal funds or with awards prior to January 1, 2025, must certify compliance with the same laws and demonstrate no INA 274 conviction. If the certification is not submitted or is found violative, the entity must repay the awarded funds, establishing a retroactive enforcement mechanism.
Denial of tax-exemption
Adds a new subsection to Section 503 of the Internal Revenue Code: an organization described in section 501(c) shall not be exempt if it fails to submit the required certification or is found to have violated INA 274. The subsection also allows for re-application for exemption after at least one year if exemption is revoked.
DHS reporting and guidance
Requires the Department of Homeland Security to develop a written strategy and best-practices guide for non-profits to ensure compliance with trafficking laws, publish information on violations, and establish cooperation mechanisms with state and federal law enforcement to deter and report violations.
GAO reporting
Directs the Comptroller General to report to Congress on any violations by non-profits regarding certification, with initial findings due within 180 days and annual updates thereafter.
Applicability
Affirms that the certification requirement applies to any nonprofit entity that is currently funded or has any federal funding relationship as of the enactment date, ensuring broad applicability across programs and agencies.
Verification removal reference
Amends Section 432 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 by striking subsection (d), aligning verification provisions with the new certification framework and expanding the compliance regime for nonprofit organizations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Nonprofits that already maintain robust compliance programs gain a clearer pathway to continued funding and avoid inadvertent penalties.
- OMB and federal grantmaking agencies gain a standardized, auditable framework for vetting recipients and preventing disbursement to violators.
- Donors and philanthropic funders benefit from greater assurance that funds go to compliant, law-abiding organizations.
- Tax-exempt organizations that meet the certification requirements protect their tax status and reduce enforcement risk for donors.
- U.S. taxpayers benefit from reduced risk of funds flowing to entities with trafficking or smuggling violations.
Who Bears the Cost
- Non-profit recipients that lack compliance infrastructure will need to invest in governance and verification systems to meet certification requirements.
- Organizations that fail to certify or violate INA 274 face repayment of funds and potential loss of tax-exempt status.
- Federal agencies and the OMB incur administrative costs to implement the certification and monitoring regime.
- The IRS and state charity regulators may see increased workload enforcing tax-exemption provisions and processing revocation actions.
- Taxpayers bear indirect costs related to enforcement and oversight, including administration and potential legal challenges.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing rigorous anti-trafficking enforcement with the risk of over-broad penalties for nonprofits that may be operating in good faith but lack resources to implement complex compliance regimes.
The bill introduces a broad, consequences-based framework that could reshape nonprofit funding and tax-exemption regimes. While it strengthens accountability by tying funding to compliance with trafficking and smuggling laws, it also imposes substantial new verification duties on a wide range of organizations and increases the likelihood of fund repayment and loss of tax-exempt status.
Implementation will require clear guidance from DHS on what constitutes compliance, reliable mechanisms for certification, and robust due process if exemptions are challenged. A potential risk is that the certification process could be used to penalize organizations with ambiguous or evolving interpretations of trafficking-related statutes, or to strain legitimate programs that rely on federal funding but lack the in-house compliance infrastructure to meet the new standard.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.