The Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025 amends 18 U.S.C. 1801 to broaden the federal prohibition on video voyeurism by adding a new subsection that ties the offense to interstate or foreign commerce and related transmission activities. It also increases the maximum penalty—from imprisonment of not more than one year to not more than five years.
The bill renames and reorganizes the jurisdictional qualifier, so the prohibited conduct applies in a circumstance described in the new subsection (d) rather than only within traditional maritime or territorial limits of the United States.
By creating a cross-border framework for video voyeurism, the bill closes potential gaps where violative conduct could occur outside one state yet remain unprosecuted at the federal level. The changes are designed to enable federal authorities to pursue cases where the recording, transmission, or facilitation of voyeuristic acts leverages interstate or foreign networks, channels, or devices, and to ensure meaningful penalties in those scenarios.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill expands 18 U.S.C. 1801(a) by adding a new subsection (d) that defines seven cross-border circumstances in which video voyeurism can be charged under federal law. It also raises the maximum imprisonment to five years and replaces the old maritime- and territorial-jurisdiction qualifier with a broader, commerce-linked standard.
Who It Affects
Directly affects individuals who commit or are victims of voyeuristic recording that travels across state lines or through interstate networks, as well as federal prosecutors and law enforcement handling cross-border cases.
Why It Matters
It closes jurisdictional gaps by linking voyeurism offenses to interstate or foreign commerce, enabling federal enforcement and deterring cross-border exploitation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025 modifies the federal framework for prosecuting video voyeurism. It adds a new subsection that describes the circumstances under which interstate or foreign commerce involvement makes the act a federal crime, and it raises the potential penalty.
The effect is to broaden the reach of the existing statute so that acts of covert recording, transmission, or facilitation of voyeurism that touch cross-border networks can be charged at the federal level.
Concretely, the bill adds subsection (d) to 18 U.S.C. 1801, listing seven pathways that tie the offense to commerce and interstate activity. These pathways include travel across state lines, use of interstate means or channels, payments connected to the conduct, and the transmission of related communications across borders, among others.
The act also covers equipment that has traveled in interstate commerce and conduct that occurs in U.S. territories or otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce.By shifting the trigger from a maritime/territorial qualifier to a broader commerce-based framework, the law recognizes that modern surveillance and sharing of intimate materials increasingly occur through cross-border networks. The bill thus clarifies when federal charges can attach and increases the potential punishment to up to five years in prison for violators engaged in cross-border voyeurism.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 1 adds the Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025 as the short title.
Section 2 expands 18 U.S.C. 1801(a) to include a new subsection (d) with seven cross-border circumstances.
Maximum penalty for the offense rises from 1 year to up to 5 years imprisonment.
The cross-border circumstances connect the crime to interstate or foreign commerce via travel, communications, payments, or equipment.
Conduct within U.S. territories or that otherwise affects interstate/foreign commerce is explicitly covered.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Section 1 establishes the Act's official designation as the Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025. This sets the naming convention for prosecutorial and enforcement references but does not alter substantive prohibitions.
Expanded prohibition against video voyeurism
Section 2 amends 18 U.S.C. 1801(a) by removing the maritime/territorial jurisdiction qualifier and tying the offense to a new subsection (d) that describes seven cross-border circumstances. It also raises the maximum penalty to five years in prison and expands the jurisdictional reach to cases involving interstate or foreign commerce, including transmissions, payments, and equipment that have moved across borders.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Privacy across all five countries.
Explore Privacy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Victims of cross-border video voyeurism receive stronger federal protection because cases can be charged under a broader jurisdiction when interstate activity is involved.
- Federal prosecutors and U.S. Attorneys gain clearer authority to pursue cross-border voyeurism cases that leverage interstate or foreign networks.
- Privacy advocacy groups gain a framework for stronger enforcement of privacy protections against exploitative recording and sharing across borders.
Who Bears the Cost
- Defendants charged under the broadened statute face higher potential penalties (up to 5 years).
- Federal agencies (e.g., FBI, U.S. Attorneys) may require additional resources to investigate and prosecute cross-border voyeurism cases.
- Defense attorneys and the courts will handle more complex cross-border cases, potentially increasing litigation time and costs.
- Interstate digital platforms and service providers may need to adapt compliance and reporting practices to address cross-border transmission-related cases.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether expanding federal reach to cover cross-border voyeurism (via seven enumerated circumstances) provides meaningful protection without creating over-criminalization or vague standards for proving interstate commerce connections.
The expansion of the statute creates a broader federal net for prosecuting video voyeurism, particularly where acts and related communications cross state lines or national boundaries. While this strengthens victims’ protections and deters cross-border exploitation, it also raises questions about the boundaries of federal jurisdiction in digital spaces and the practical challenges of enforcing a wider set of cross-border conditions.
Implementation will depend on how prosecutors interpret the seven enumerated circumstances and apply them in cases where evidence of interstate commerce is indirect or circumstantial.
A key tension lies in balancing robust protection against voyeurism with the risk of over-criminalizing conduct that may involve ambiguous online activity, ambiguous intent, or multifaceted cross-border communications. Clarifying standards for evidence, the role of technology in establishing interstate connections, and the allocation of resources across federal and state authorities will be critical in the bill’s practical application.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.