HB 1332 would establish a federal program to sequence the genomes of aquatic species, coordinated with a wide range of covered entities to support conservation, management, and enforcement. The program would identify and catalog vouchered specimens, collect and sequence DNA, and store and publish genomic data and associated metadata.
A tribal-government data governance provision lets Tribes decide if and when to disclose data publicly, and the bill includes funding to support these activities while defining key terms to guide implementation.
The bill emphasizes public accessibility of genomic data within a 360-day window after sequencing, while preserving tribal sovereignty over disclosure decisions. It also adopts the FAIR data management framework to govern how data is stored and shared, and it sets a clear funding baseline and a defined effective date.
Taken together, the provisions are designed to accelerate genomic understanding of aquatic biodiversity while balancing scientific openness with Indigenous data governance and stewardship responsibilities.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Secretary must establish a program to sequence genomes of aquatic species and manage the resulting data, including cataloging specimens, collecting samples, sequencing to reference standards, and storing metadata. It also requires making sequenced data publicly available within a defined timeline and under FAIR principles.
Who It Affects
Covered entities (federal agencies, state governments, Tribal Governments, Native Hawaiian organizations, nonprofit organizations, and institutions of higher education) participate in sequencing and data submission; researchers and conservation programs rely on public genome data; Tribal Governments control the timing of data disclosure.
Why It Matters
This sets a national framework for aquatic genomics, standardizes data management, and speeds conservation and enforcement efforts through open genomic data, while respecting Tribal sovereignty over sensitive data.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Aquatic Biodiversity Preservation Act of 2025 directs the Secretary of Commerce to create and operate a program that sequences the genomes of aquatic species. The program coordinates with a defined set of covered entities—federal and state agencies, Tribal Governments, Native Hawaiian organizations, nonprofits, and colleges—to gather specimens, obtain DNA samples, perform sequencing, and curate the resulting genomic data and metadata.
A key design feature is the open data objective: once sequencing is complete, the genome data and associated metadata must be submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information within 360 days to become publicly available, with specific fields identified for disclosure.
A tribal-government exception gives Tribal Governments exclusive authority to decide whether and when to submit data for public release, preserving sovereignty over Indigenous data. The bill also requires the program to provide funding and technical assistance to participating entities and to establish data management principles in line with The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.
The act defines “priority species” and other terms to guide which species are targeted and who qualifies as a covered entity, and it sets a funding level of $2 million per fiscal year from 2025 through 2031. The program becomes effective 180 days after enactment.In short, the bill seeks to advance scientific understanding and practical conservation through a centralized genome sequencing program, while codifying a framework for data sharing and governance that respects Tribal authority and supports researchers and institutions nationwide.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Secretary must establish a genome sequencing program for aquatic species with eight enumerated duties (catalog specimens, collect samples, sequence genomes, and manage data).
Public genome data and metadata must be submitted to NCIBI within 360 days of sequencing completion, unless a Tribal Government determines otherwise for data release.
The bill authorizes $2,000,000 in annual appropriations from 2025–2031 to carry out the program.
Priority species are defined by incomplete sequencing status or non-public genome data and include various endangered, indicator, or ecologically significant categories.
The act becomes effective 180 days after enactment, with data management aligned to FAIR principles.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Program mandate and duties
The Secretary shall establish and carry out a program to sequence the genomes of aquatic species, in coordination with covered entities, to enhance scientific understanding and conservation, management, and enforcement. The program includes duties such as identifying and cataloguing vouchered specimens, obtaining genetic samples, extracting and processing DNA, sequencing genomes to reference standards (including nuclear, mitochondrial, and chloroplast DNA as appropriate), and collecting and storing sequencing metadata.
Participation by covered entities
A covered entity may carry out the activities described in subsections (1) through (6) of section 2(b) pursuant to the Program. This creates a formal mechanism for collaboration across federal, state, tribal, nonprofit, and academic partners to execute the sequencing and data-management activities.
Data sharing and tribal governance
Data sharing requires that, within 360 days after sequencing, the genome and associated data be made publicly available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information, with specified metadata. A Tribal Government has the sole authority to determine whether and when to submit data for public release, preserving sovereignty over Indigenous data.
Appropriations
The Act authorizes $2,000,000 in appropriations for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2031 to support program activities, including sequencing, data management, and collaborative work with covered entities.
Definitions
Key terms include ‘aquatic species of greatest conservation need,’ ‘covered entity,’ ‘priority species,’ and others (e.g., Harmful algal bloom, Indian Tribe, Native Hawaiian organization). The definitions establish who participates, what constitutes the target species, and how the data-management framework is understood.
Effective date
The provisions take effect 180 days after the date of enactment, creating a clear timeline to stand up the program and begin sequencing and data-sharing activities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Science across all five countries.
Explore Science in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal and state agencies gain standardized genomic data to inform conservation, management, and enforcement decisions.
- Tribal Governments benefit from exclusive authority over data submission decisions, enabling governance aligned with Indigenous sovereignty.
- Native Hawaiian organizations gain inclusion in program definitions and access to data offerings.
- Nonprofit organizations and institutions of higher education gain funding, collaboration opportunities, and access to genomic data for research and conservation work.
- The broader scientific and conservation research community benefits from accessible genome data and standardized metadata.
Who Bears the Cost
- Covered entities face sequencing, data-management, and coordination costs as part of program participation.
- Federal and state agencies incur program administration and interagency coordination duties.
- Tribal Governments may shoulder governance and decision-making responsibilities for data release, which could require staffing and resources.
- Nonprofits and institutions of higher education may incur lab and sequencing costs and data curation responsibilities.
- The National Center for Biotechnology Information would host and maintain public genome data, with ongoing cost implications for data storage and access infrastructure.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between rapid, open scientific data sharing to advance conservation and the sovereign rights of Tribal Governments to control the publication of Indigenous data, creating a real trade-off between transparency and governance.
The program design prioritizes open scientific data through public release of genomes and metadata, which accelerates research and conservation work. However, a Tribal Government exemption creates a governance tension by allowing Indigenous communities to determine when and whether data should be published, potentially delaying or withholding information.
Implementing the program will require coordination across many jurisdictions and institutions, which could strain participating entities if sequencing costs, data curation, or infrastructure investments outpace funding. The $2 million annual appropriation may be modest relative to the scale of nationwide sequencing efforts and long-term data stewardship needs.
The bill relies on the FAIR principles to govern data sharing, but it does not specify enforcement mechanisms or oversight beyond the tribal governance provision, leaving practical questions about accountability and data-use safeguards unresolved.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.