The Justice for Murder Victims Act (HB1353) was introduced February 13, 2025 by Rep. Tiffany and Rep.
McBath. The bill adds a new provision to 18 U.S.C.
Chapter 51 to ensure that homicide prosecutions may be pursued without regard to the elapsed time between the act or omission that caused a victim’s death and the death itself. It also updates the table of contents to reflect the new statutory entry.
The aim is to remove time-based constraints that could block federal accountability for killings, regardless of when the death becomes prosecutable.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a new §1123 to 18 U.S.C. Chapter 51, stating that prosecutions for homicide offenses may be instituted without regard to the time elapsed between the act or omission and the victim’s death. It also amends the table of contents to include this new provision.
Who It Affects
Federal prosecutors and investigators handling homicide cases, as well as the courts that adjudicate federal homicide prosecutions; the change directly touches cases with long gaps between the act and the death.
Why It Matters
By removing time-based limits, the bill closes gaps where accountability for homicide could otherwise be delayed or foregone, potentially affecting long-dormant cases and the interests of victims’ families seeking justice.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB1353 creates a new federal authority to prosecute homicide offenses without a time limit between the act that caused a death and the death itself. Specifically, Section 1123 is added to 18 U.S.C.
Chapter 51 to declare that prosecutions may proceed regardless of how much time has passed since the death occurred, for any homicide offense under federal law. The bill also updates the Table of Contents to reflect this new section.
The sponsor highlights accountability concerns and the desire to close gaps in prosecutions for murder, but the text does not introduce transitional provisions or exemptions beyond removing the time constraint. The practical effect would be to empower federal prosecutors to pursue cases that otherwise might have been time-barred, potentially long after the initial act.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds 18 U.S.C. §1123: No maximum time period between act or omission and death.
A prosecution may be instituted for any federal homicide offense without regard to elapsed time.
The bill amends the Table of Contents to reflect the new §1123.
Applies to all federal homicide offenses under U.S. law.
No explicit retroactivity clause is included; the practical impact depends on how courts apply existing rules.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Section 1 names the act the Justice for Murder Victims Act. This sets a citation label for the measure and does not itself create substantive legal changes beyond the formal designation.
No maximum time period for homicide prosecutions
Section 2(a) adds §1123 to Chapter 51 of title 18, U.S.C. to authorize prosecutions for homicide offenses without regard to the time that has elapsed between the act or omission and the death. This is the core substantive change, removing any time-based bar to federal homicide prosecutions and aligning timing with the occurrence of the underlying death rather than the sequence of events.
Table of Contents amendment
Section 2(b) amendments add an entry to the table of sections for Chapter 51: ‘1123. No maximum time period between act or omission and death of victim.’ This ensures the new provision is properly indexed in the federal code.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Justice across all five countries.
Explore Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal prosecutors and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices handling homicide cases, especially in districts with long-delayed deaths, gain authority to pursue prosecutions that might have been time-barred.
- Victims’ families seeking accountability for historic or long-delayed killings gain potential recourse where previously applicable deadlines blocked prosecutions.
- Federal investigators and law enforcement agencies (e.g., FBI) managing long-running homicide inquiries gain jurisdictional flexibility to pursue cases regardless of elapsed time.
Who Bears the Cost
- Defendants facing decades-old homicide allegations may face new or revived prosecutions, with potential implications for fairness and evidentiary challenges.
- Federal courts and prosecutors’ offices could experience increased caseloads and resource demands from additional prosecutions across long time spans.
- Defense counsel representing older cases may confront more complex trials, longer discovery timelines, and older evidentiary issues requiring additional preparation.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing the goal of ensuring accountability for murder with the challenges of prosecuting decades-old cases, including potential issues with evidence reliability, witness memory, and resource allocation for prosecutors and the courts.
The bill makes a clear policy choice: accountability for homicide should not be constrained by time. This raises practical tensions around the reliability of older evidence, witness availability, and the preservation of records over long periods.
While it eliminates a specific limitation on federal prosecutions, it does not address transitional rules for ongoing cases or provide guidance on how to manage evidence and testimony ages. The absence of an explicit retroactivity provision invites questions about how existing cases and historical investigations will be handled in practice, and whether there will be expectations about reopening or reviving stalled prosecutions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.