Codify — Article

Black History Matters Act to study Black history education in public schools

A federal study to map, evaluate, and report on Black history education in K–12 across states and districts

The Brief

The Black History Matters Act directs the Director of the National Museum of African American History and Culture to conduct a nationwide study of Black history education in public elementary and secondary schools. The study will look at whether states and local education agencies require Black history education, how the instruction is delivered, and what materials are used.

It will also examine the breadth and duration of Black history offerings and how student knowledge is assessed. The Director must report the findings back to Congress after completing the study.

This act establishes a baseline understanding of how Black history is taught today and what gaps or strengths exist, informing potential policy or program decisions in the future.

At a Glance

What It Does

Directs a study by the National Museum of African American History and Culture to map current Black history education requirements, evaluate instructional quality, and review materials and assessments.

Who It Affects

Public elementary and secondary schools, state and local educational agencies, teachers, curriculum developers, publishers of instructional materials, and education policymakers.

Why It Matters

Provides a data-driven baseline on Black history education, helping policymakers understand coverage, quality, and resource needs without mandating curricula today.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The act tasks the Director of the National Museum of African American History and Culture with a formal study of Black history education in public K–12 schools. The study must begin within 180 days of enactment and be completed within three years.

It will identify which states and local education agencies require Black history education, and which do not, and will assess the quality of instruction using concrete indicators such as in-class discussions, out-of-class activities, and project-based learning. The inquiry also looks at the types and quality of instructional materials used and whether Black history offerings are present, how long they last, and how comprehensive they are.

In addition to content and materials, the study will examine how schools assess students’ knowledge about Black history, including traditional tests and nontraditional methods. After the study concludes, the Director must prepare a report for Congress detailing the findings, with the final submission due within 180 days of study completion.

Definitions in the bill clarify terms like Black history, Black history education, and project-based learning to ensure consistent interpretation across jurisdictions.Overall, the bill creates a structured mechanism to understand the state of Black history education today, establishing a factual basis for any future policy considerations without dictating curricular changes today.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The Director must begin the study within 180 days and complete it within 3 years of enactment.

2

The study will map states and local education agencies that require Black history education and those that do not.

3

Quality indicators include in-class discussion, out-of-class activities, and project-based learning.

4

The study will review the types and quality of instructional materials and the scope of Black history courses.

5

A final report to Congress is due within 180 days after the study is completed.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Black History Matters Act.

Section 2(a)

Study requirement

The Director shall conduct a study on Black history education in public elementary and secondary schools, beginning no later than 180 days after enactment and concluding not later than three years after enactment.

Section 2(b)

Elements of the study

The study shall identify States and local educational agencies that require Black history education, identify those that do not, assess quality using indicators such as in-class discussion, out-of-class activities, and project-based learning, and examine the types and quality of instructional materials and the duration and comprehensiveness of Black history courses or lessons.

2 more sections
Section 2(c)

Reporting to Congress

Following completion of the study, the Director shall prepare and submit to Congress a report on the findings not later than 180 days after the study’s completion.

Section 2(d)

Definitions

Definitions include terms from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 for elementary and secondary schools, State, and local educational agency; Black history to mean the study of Black life and the achievements and struggles of African Americans; Black history education to mean activities intended to improve awareness of Black history, including lessons on slavery, Reconstruction, Jim Crow, and the Civil Rights movement; and project-based learning as a learning method built around real-world projects.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.

Explore Education in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Public school students, particularly in districts expanding or clarifying Black history education, gain clearer exposure to Black history content and related critical thinking skills.
  • Teachers and curriculum developers receive guidance on expectations and access to evaluated materials and instructional approaches.
  • State and local educational agencies obtain data and a framework to assess and potentially improve curricula and resource allocation.
  • Policymakers and Congress gain a consolidated evidence base to inform future policy decisions without imposing current curricular mandates.

Who Bears the Cost

  • The National Museum of African American History and Culture will incur initial costs to plan and execute the study.
  • State and local educational agencies will contribute data and cooperation, including sharing curricular materials and assessment practices.
  • Educational publishers and material providers may need to supply information about available Black history educational resources.
  • Federal funding is required to cover study-related expenses and reporting efforts.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is whether a national-level study of Black history education should inform future policy without unintentionally constraining local control or provoking reactions from stakeholders who favor or oppose specific curricular approaches.

The bill creates a rigorous data-gathering exercise aimed at understanding how Black history is taught today, but it does not mandate curricular changes in advance. Practical challenges include variability in state standards, data availability, and differences in how Black history is defined and taught across districts.

Gathering consistent data across hundreds of school districts will require cooperation and standardization efforts; there is also a risk that findings could trigger calls for policy shifts. The tension lies in collecting meaningful information while avoiding unintended pressures on local curricula or political contentiousness around content.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.