This bill amends Internal Revenue Code section 45S to increase the statutory percentages used to calculate the employer credit for paid family and medical leave. It replaces the existing 12.5% base figure with 25%, the existing 25% maximum with 50%, and doubles the incremental rate step from 0.25 percentage points to 0.50 percentage points.
The bill also eliminates subsection (f) of section 45S, removing the credit’s scheduled expiration and making the enlarged credit permanent. The changes take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, which shifts the financial calculus for employers considering leave benefits and alters projected federal revenue from the credit.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill revises the numerical parameters in IRC §45S(a)(2) — raising the base and maximum credit rates and increasing the incremental step used in the credit formula. It also strikes the statutory sunset provision for the credit, converting it to a permanent provision.
Who It Affects
Employers that offer paid family and medical leave and claim the section 45S credit, their payroll and tax departments, and tax advisors who prepare corporate returns. The IRS/Treasury will implement and administer the larger, permanent credit.
Why It Matters
By increasing the statutory rates and removing the sunset, the bill raises the after-tax subsidy for employer-provided leave, likely changing benefit design decisions and producing measurable federal revenue consequences. The permanence of the change removes a legislative review point for the program.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section 45S currently gives employers a tax credit tied to wages paid for qualifying paid family and medical leave; that credit is calculated using specific percentage figures embedded in the statute. This bill directly edits those embedded figures: it substitutes higher percentages in the statutory formula so that, all else equal, the credit an employer calculates will be larger.
The text alters three numeric entries in subsection (a)(2), increasing the base rate, the cap, and the incremental step that scales the credit.
Beyond numerical changes, the bill eliminates the statutory provision that set an expiration for the credit. Removing that subsection means Congress no longer specifies an automatic termination date inside section 45S; the credit, at the new rates, would remain on the books indefinitely unless future legislation changes it.
That alters how employers and financial planners treat the credit — from a temporary, potentially transitional incentive to a permanent element of tax planning.The bill sets a single effective date: the amendments apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025. Practically, that gives employers one calendar year to evaluate the changed credit before it affects filings.
The bill does not alter the underlying eligibility rules, qualifying wage definitions, documentation requirements, or the basic method for claiming the credit; it only changes the percentage parameters and removes the sunset. As a result, firms that already meet the existing §45S requirements will see a higher credit, while firms currently excluded by eligibility rules receive no change in status from this bill alone.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill replaces the statutory '12.5 percent' figure in IRC §45S(a)(2) with '25 percent'.
It replaces the statutory '25 percent' figure in IRC §45S(a)(2) with '50 percent'.
It doubles the incremental step in the statute by changing '0.25 percentage points' to '0.50 percentage points' in §45S(a)(2).
The bill strikes subsection (f) of section 45S, removing the credit’s sunset and making the credit permanent.
The amendments apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Numeric increases to §45S(a)(2) credit parameters
This provision edits three specific numeric references in subsection (a)(2) of IRC §45S: it increases the base percentage, the maximum percentage, and the incremental percentage step. Because §45S calculates an employer’s credit using those embedded numbers, the change directly increases the dollar value of the credit for employers who meet the statute’s eligibility and wage-replacement criteria. The amendment leaves the statutory calculation structure intact but raises the statutory caps, which alters the maximum subsidy employers can receive without changing what counts as qualifying wages or leave.
Removal of the sunset (strike of §45S(f))
This short textual change deletes subsection (f) from section 45S, which in the current law set a termination date for the credit. By striking that subsection the bill removes the built-in expiration date and makes the enlarged credit permanent. For implementation, this means Treasury and IRS will treat the credit as a standing part of the code unless Congress later amends or repeals it.
Effective date for taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2025
The effective-date clause confines the statutory changes to tax years that begin after December 31, 2025. Firms with fiscal years that do not align with the calendar should model the impact on their specific taxable year. The delayed start gives employers, payroll administrators, and advisers time to adjust benefit design and tax planning, but it also means filings for 2026 taxable years will be the first affected.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Employers that already qualify for the §45S credit — they receive a larger direct tax subsidy for qualifying paid family and medical leave because the statutory percentages that determine the credit increase.
- Employees at firms that respond to the larger subsidy by expanding wage replacement or making leave more accessible — higher after-tax incentives increase the chance employers enhance leave offerings.
- Tax advisors and payroll service providers — demand for recalculating credits, redesigning payroll reporting, and advising on benefit optimization will rise as firms adapt to the new parameters.
Who Bears the Cost
- The federal Treasury — enlarging and permanently codifying the credit reduces federal receipts relative to current law, increasing the budgetary cost of the program.
- Employers that do not meet §45S eligibility criteria — they receive no offset but still confront competitive pressure if peers expand leave using the larger credit.
- IRS/administrative resources — a permanent, larger credit may increase audit and guidance needs, imposing administrative burdens and potential costs on the agency.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between using a larger, permanent tax credit to incentivize employer-provided paid leave and the risk that a permanently increased tax expenditure will cost significant federal revenue while not precisely targeting the workers most in need; the bill boosts incentives but sacrifices a legislative review point and leaves targeting and administrative complexity unaddressed.
The bill focuses narrowly on three numeric edits and the removal of a sunset; it does not touch eligibility definitions, documentation standards, interaction rules with state programs, or the statutory base that determines qualifying wages. That narrowness creates two practical issues: first, the enlarged credit may produce windfalls for employers who already provide generous leave without changing behavior, and second, it may fail to reach workers in firms that do not meet §45S qualifications.
Policymakers seeking to better target support for lower-wage workers or firms with limited cash flow would need separate changes to definitions or refundable treatment.
Making the credit permanent resolves uncertainty for employers but also removes an automatic fiscal check. Permanence increases the long-term budget exposure and reduces Congress’s built-in opportunity to reassess program performance.
Implementation questions also arise: the IRS will need to incorporate the new percentages into guidance, forms, and audits, and firms must update payroll systems. Finally, because the bill does not address coordination with state paid-leave programs, employers participating in state programs may face ambiguity about stacking or offsetting benefits absent additional regulatory guidance.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.