The bill adds a new section to the Internal Revenue Code that creates a refundable income tax credit for purchases of qualified access technology made for use by a ‘‘qualified blind individual’’ (the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or a dependent). It targets out‑of‑pocket spending not covered by insurance and caps the assistance to control fiscal exposure.
Why it matters: the measure directly subsidizes assistive hardware and software — the devices and programs that convert visually presented information into formats usable by blind people — and does so through the tax code as a refundable credit (meaning eligible filers can receive payments even if they owe no tax). The credit includes a per‑person limit over a rolling 3‑year period, an inflation adjustment after 2026, and a statutory sunset at the end of 2030, all of which shape how households and vendors will plan purchases and documentation.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates section 36C of the Internal Revenue Code to allow a refundable credit for amounts paid for ‘‘qualified access technology’’ used by a qualified blind individual, subject to a statutory per‑person limit and anti‑duplication rules. The credit is available only for expenses not reimbursed by insurance or other sources.
Who It Affects
Individual taxpayers who are blind, family members who buy assistive tech for a blind spouse or dependent, manufacturers and vendors of assistive technology, tax preparers, and the IRS (which must administer and verify claims). It does not apply to purchases reimbursed by insurance or other benefits.
Why It Matters
This is a targeted federal subsidy delivered through the tax code rather than a grant or voucher program, which changes how benefits flow (via tax filings) and who can access them. The refundability and the 3‑year per‑person cap create both access for low‑income filers and planning complexities for households and providers.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill establishes a new, refundable tax credit for spending on assistive technology that converts or adapts visually represented information into formats usable by blind people. Eligible purchases include hardware and software whose primary function is that conversion or adaptation — for example, dedicated screen‑reading devices, Braille displays, or software designed to render text and images into audio or tactile output.
The statute requires that the expense not be ‘‘compensated for by insurance or otherwise,’’ so taxpayers must show the portion they paid out of pocket.
Each qualified blind individual is limited to $2,000 of credit in any rolling three‑consecutive‑taxable‑year period. The credit is refundable, so taxpayers who owe little or no federal income tax can still receive the benefit as a payment; that feature broadens access to low‑income blind individuals who would otherwise not benefit from a nonrefundable credit.
The bill also prohibits claiming the same expense as another deduction or credit under the Code, and it ties the definition of blindness to the existing IRC reference (section 63(f)(4)).The text instructs the IRS to implement an inflation adjustment for the $2,000 threshold beginning after 2026, with adjustments rounded down to the next $100 increment. The credit terminates for purchases made in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2030; it becomes effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.
The bill contains conforming technical edits to existing penalty and assessment sections so the new credit is integrated into IRS administration and notice rules.Practically speaking, taxpayers will claim the credit on their federal returns and must retain substantiation that the purchase was qualified and not reimbursed. Vendors and manufacturers of assistive tech may see higher demand; tax preparers will need to advise clients on the 3‑year aggregation rule and insurance coordination.
Because the definition requires the product’s ‘‘primary function’’ be conversion or adaptation of visual information, many mainstream devices that include accessibility features but serve broader functions could fall outside the credit unless their primary design intent is accessibility.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The credit is refundable — eligible taxpayers can receive a payment even if their federal income tax liability is zero.
Per qualified blind individual, the credit cannot exceed $2,000 in any 3‑consecutive‑taxable‑year period (a rolling aggregation rule).
The credit covers only out‑of‑pocket costs for ‘‘qualified access technology’’ whose primary function is converting or adapting visually represented information into formats usable by blind individuals.
Claimants may not claim the same purchase as a deduction or under any other tax credit; expenses reimbursed by insurance or other sources are ineligible.
The provision is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025; the $2,000 limit is indexed for inflation after 2026 (rounded down to the next $100), and the credit sunsets for amounts paid in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2030.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This one‑line provision gives the act its popular name, ‘‘Access Technology Affordability Act of 2025.’
Allowance of credit and scope
Creates new IRC section 36C and authorizes a refundable credit equal to the taxpayer’s unreimbursed payments for qualified access technology used by a qualified blind individual who is the taxpayer, the spouse, or a dependent. This subsection establishes the basic eligibility gate: who may be the user and that only unreimbursed outlays qualify — a practical constraint that requires taxpayers to segregate covered and reimbursed expenses.
Aggregate limit and 3‑year rule
Imposes the $2,000 cap measured over any continuous three‑consecutive‑taxable‑year period per qualified blind individual. That aggregation is not an annual limit but a rolling multi‑year ceiling, which affects timing decisions for large purchases and may require households to spread acquisitions across tax years to maximize benefit.
Definitions: blindness and qualified access technology
Adopts the Code’s existing definition of blindness by reference and defines qualified access technology narrowly as hardware, software, or other information technology whose primary function is converting or adapting visually represented information for blind users. The ‘‘primary function’’ test is the operative threshold that will determine whether multifunction devices qualify, creating a substantive line between dedicated assistive devices and general‑purpose consumer electronics with accessibility features.
Anti‑duplication, inflation adjustment, and termination
Prohibits claiming the same expense under other Code provisions (preventing double benefits), instructs the IRS to index the $2,000 limit for cost‑of‑living increases beginning after 2026 with rounding to the next lower $100 multiple, and sets a statutory sunset so the credit does not apply to amounts paid in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2030. These mechanics put temporal and fiscal boundaries around the program.
Conforming amendments for IRS administration
Inserts references to section 36C into existing enforcement and collection provisions (e.g., section 6211(b)(4)(A) and 31 U.S.C. 1324(b)(2)) and updates the subpart table of sections. These are technical edits that ensure the credit is discoverable in IRS notices, refund procedures, and levy/offset rules.
Effective date
Specifies that all amendments apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025. That timing determines the first tax year for which taxpayers may claim the credit and interacts with the 3‑year aggregation rule and the sunset date.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Blind taxpayers and blind dependents — reduce net cost of assistive hardware and software the household purchases, and broaden access through a refundable payment for low‑income filers who owe little or no income tax.
- Family households and caregivers who purchase assistive tech for a blind spouse or dependent — the credit directly offsets out‑of‑pocket spending and can make higher‑cost devices more affordable when planned across years.
- Manufacturers, resellers, and service providers of assistive technology — increased demand and clearer market signals for products defined as having a primary accessibility function may follow from the subsidy.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal Treasury — refundable credits increase near‑term outlays and reduce receipts, producing a measurable fiscal cost through 2030 and beyond if extended.
- IRS and tax administration — the agency must develop forms, guidance, verification procedures for eligibility, and processes to track the 3‑year aggregation rule and inflation indexing, creating administrative workload and possible compliance disputes.
- Taxpayers and preparers — households must retain documentation proving purchases and non‑reimbursement, and tax professionals must advise clients on the interaction with insurance, other credits, and the rolling 3‑year cap, increasing compliance complexity.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate aims that pull in opposite directions: tightly containing fiscal exposure with a capped, time‑limited credit versus creating broad, simple access to assistive technology for blind people. Narrow definitions, a multi‑year cap, and a sunset control costs but raise practical barriers and legal uncertainty for people who rely on mainstream devices with accessibility features; expanding eligibility to avoid exclusion would drive higher and harder‑to‑predict fiscal costs.
The bill uses a ‘‘primary function’’ test to define qualifying technology, which is administrable in principle but will be contested in practice. Many mainstream devices (smartphones, tablets, laptops) include screen readers or accessibility apps but are fundamentally multipurpose; taxpayers and vendors may litigate whether such items qualify if the device wasn’t primarily designed as an assistive technology.
The IRS will likely need product‑level guidance or a safe harbor list, and absent that, taxpayers will face uncertainty when claiming the credit.
Two temporal design choices drive tension: a rolling 3‑year cap and a statutory sunset at the end of 2030. The 3‑year aggregation rule moderates cost but complicates planning for one‑time big purchases (for example, specialty Braille displays), potentially forcing buyers to delay acquisitions or accept partial coverage.
The sunset treats this as a temporary subsidy rather than ongoing support for a continuing accessibility need; that choice limits long‑term market effects and raises questions about continuity for purchasers who plan multi‑year finance or lease arrangements. Finally, although refundability increases access for low‑income filers, obtaining the benefit requires filing returns and meeting substantiation rules — a practical barrier for some of the very households the credit intends to help.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.