The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to assess the suitability and feasibility of establishing the African Burial Ground International Memorial Museum and Educational Center at the African Burial Ground National Monument in New York City. The study envisions a permanent living memorial with exhibits and education programs, and it calls for collaboration with state/local preservation groups, museums, and other organizations, including potential ties to the Smithsonian.
It also requires evaluating collections and locations, including a DNA sampling component to aid research. A final report is due within three years of funds becoming available.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Secretary must conduct a comprehensive feasibility study, consulting with state/local preservation bodies, historical societies, tourism offices, and other partners to assess establishing the Museum at the National Monument.
Who It Affects
State and local preservation officials, museums, universities, cultural organizations, and New York-based institutions, along with the National Park Service and local communities.
Why It Matters
This study could establish a framework for a national memorial and educational center that honors enslaved Africans and illuminates the diaspora, while testing collaborative models with major cultural institutions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section 1 designates the act by name and sets the federal purpose. Section 2 provides precise definitions for the key terms used in the act, including Museum, National Monument, Secretary, and State.
Section 3 tasks the Interior Secretary with a detailed study to determine whether establishing the African Burial Ground International Memorial Museum and Educational Center at the National Monument is suitable and feasible. The study is to be conducted in consultation with state and local preservation officers, historical societies, tourism offices, and other relevant groups, and it envisions the Museum serving as a permanent living memorial to enslaved Africans, reflecting their significance and cultural traditions, and offering permanent and temporary exhibits and a space for collections and research.
It also contemplates collaboration with the National Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC), other museums, historically Black colleges and universities, and related organizations, including consideration of DNA sampling to support research into ancestral roots. The act requires evaluating potential locations, including 22 Reade Street or other areas within the National Monument, and developing a conceptual financial plan involving all participants, including the Federal Government.
A final report, due within three years after funds are first made available, must describe the study’s results, location criteria, and cost estimates, and provide conclusions and recommendations.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires the Interior Secretary to conduct a nationwide feasibility study with broad consultation to assess establishing the Museum at the National Monument.
The study will evaluate whether a suitable assemblage of collections exists, including DNA samples for research on ancestry linked to the enslaved.
The Museum is envisioned as a permanent living memorial with spaces for permanent and temporary exhibits and for collecting and studying artifacts and documents.
The study contemplates partnerships with the Smithsonian, NMAAHC, other museums, and HBCUs, plus a formal financial plan involving multiple participants, including the Federal Government.
A final report is due within three years after funds are available, detailing collection availability, location criteria, and projected costs for property, construction, and operations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section designates the act by its citation: the African Burial Ground International Memorial Museum and Educational Center Study Act. It establishes the federal objective to authorize a study by the Secretary of the Interior to explore establishing the Museum at the National Monument.
Definitions
Defines terms used in the act: 'Museum' means the African Burial Ground International Memorial Museum and Educational Center; 'National Monument' means the African Burial Ground National Monument in New York City; 'Secretary' means the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National Park Service; and 'State' means the State of New York.
Study of the Museum and Educational Center
(a) General— The Secretary, in consultation with state and local preservation officers, historical societies, tourism offices, and other appropriate groups, shall conduct a study to assess the suitability and feasibility of establishing the Museum at the National Monument. The Museum would memorialize the enslaved and reflect on African cultural traditions, explore slavery globally, provide spaces for exhibits and collections, and collaborate with the National Museum of African American History and Culture and other partner entities, including potential involvement with the Smithsonian’s Board of Regents. (b) Requirements— The study shall determine whether there is a viable assemblage of collections (including DNA samples to trace ancestral roots) and whether local and federal partners can support the Museum, identify potential locations (such as 22 Reade Street or other areas within the National Monument), and develop a financial plan outlining roles and responsibilities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Culture across all five countries.
Explore Culture in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- African Burial Ground Memorial Foundation—supports planning and program development for the Memorial and Center.
- National Park Service and the Interior Department—benefit from a clear feasibility framework and potential alignment with heritage goals.
- New York State and City historic preservation and tourism offices—gain a coordinated plan and potential economic and cultural gains.
- Scholars and researchers in African diaspora history and genetics—could access collections and DNA-based research opportunities under proper safeguards.
- Local enslaved-African-descendant communities and New York-area cultural organizations—benefit from memorialization and educational opportunities.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal Government funding for the study and potential capital costs of the Museum.
- National Park Service personnel and resources dedicated to planning, collections, and site integration.
- State and local partners for planning, permitting, and potential property acquisition.
- Local businesses and institutions in proximity to proposed locations who may incur planning and development costs.
- Private sector stakeholders who participate in cooperative programs and exhibitions and may bear some programmatic costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to pursue a federally led, multinationally partnered museum project with extensive exhibits and DNA research, which promises national significance but comes with high cost, governance complexity, and ethical considerations, or to pursue a more modest approach that prioritizes local memorialization and education with fewer federal commitments.
The bill envisions a robust, collaboration-driven process to design a national memorial museum, but it raises policy tensions around how DNA evidence from interred individuals should be used and protected, the pace and cost of establishing a new federal museum, and the distribution of responsibilities among federal, state, and local partners. There are questions about balancing the integrity of the site with broader public access, ensuring ethically sound handling of remains and DNA data, and the potential influence of large partners such as the Smithsonian.
Funding, governance, and long-term stewardship would need clear, enforceable arrangements to avoid scope creep or inter-agency friction. The act also relies on determining the most suitable location within or adjacent to the National Monument, a decision that could affect site preservation, traffic, and community access.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.