The Securing Our Radioactive Materials Act directs the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to act on a GAO report about radiological security gaps. It requires the NRC to incorporate socioeconomic consequences into its security decisions and to implement concrete, near-term actions related to Category 3 licenses and sources.
It also sets a deadline for updating applicable regulations to carry out these actions.
At a Glance
What It Does
The NRC must factor socioeconomic consequences into its security decisions for radioactive materials and immediately require three major actions: add all Category 3 licenses to the Web-based Licensing System; ensure all Category 3 sources are tracked in the National Source Tracking System; and require vendors to verify purchasers’ Category 3 licenses with the regulator.
Who It Affects
Regulated entities dealing with Category 3 materials, including licensees, vendors, and licensing authorities, plus NRC staff and federal security agencies.
Why It Matters
The measures aim to close security gaps identified by GAO, improve traceability of sensitive radiological materials, and align licensing practices with risk-informed security decisions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill moves the NRC to address known gaps in radiological security by integrating socioeconomic considerations into its risk assessments and decision-making for security measures. It then mandates three concrete actions focused on Category 3 materials: (1) add all Category 3 licenses to the NRC’s Web-based Licensing System, (2) include and track all Category 3 sources in the National Source Tracking System, and (3) require vendors to verify the legitimacy of potential purchasers’ Category 3 licenses with the regulator.
In addition, the NRC must revise any relevant guidelines, policies, and regulations within one year to implement these changes. The overall goal is to tighten control over Category 3 radiological materials, improve accountability, and ensure that security decisions reflect broader social and economic impacts.
The bill relies on the GAO report Preventing a Dirty Bomb to justify these steps and emphasizes timely regulatory updates to support implementation. This combination of governance, technology upgrades, and verification aims to reduce the risk of illicit access to Category 3 materials while providing a clear framework for compliance and oversight.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires the NRC to incorporate socioeconomic consequences into security decision-making for radioactive materials.
Section 2(a)(2)(A) requires all Category 3 licenses to be added to the NRC’s Web-based Licensing System.
Section 2(a)(2)(B) requires all Category 3 sources to be included and tracked in the National Source Tracking System.
Section 2(a)(2)(C) requires vendors to verify prospective purchasers’ Category 3 licenses with the regulator.
Not later than 1 year after enactment, NRC must revise guidelines and regulations to implement these actions.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Socioeconomic considerations in security decisions
The bill instructs the NRC to incorporate socioeconomic consequences into its decision-making when setting security measures for radioactive materials. This requires assessing how security policies affect communities, public health, economic activity, and equity, so that security requirements reflect broader social and economic realities rather than security considerations alone.
Web Licensing System expansion for Category 3 licenses
The NRC must ensure that all Category 3 licenses are entered into the Web-based Licensing System. This enhances visibility, monitoring, and enforcement by centralizing license data and enabling consistent, real-time access for regulators and licensees.
National Source Tracking System coverage for Category 3 sources
All Category 3 sources must be included in and tracked within the National Source Tracking System. This expands traceability of sensitive radiological materials and supports timely detection of unauthorized movement or use across the supply chain.
Vendor verification of purchasers’ licenses
Vendors must verify the legitimacy of would-be purchasers’ Category 3 licenses with the appropriate regulator before completing sales. This creates a tighter buyer-screening regime and reduces the risk of illicit acquisition of Category 3 materials.
Regulatory revisions due within 1 year
Within one year of enactment, the NRC must revise applicable guides, policies, and regulations as necessary to implement the actions in subsection (a). This ensures that the new requirements are codified and enforceable, and that guidance keeps pace with the updated system and processes.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.
Explore Energy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- NRC program offices and staff gain clearer authority and more complete data to guide security decisions.
- Licensees that hold Category 3 licenses benefit from a clearer, centralized licensing framework and strengthened compliance expectations, reducing ambiguity.
- Vendors handling Category 3 materials benefit from a formalized purchaser verification process that lowers risk of illegal transactions.
- Law enforcement and homeland security agencies gain better visibility into transfers and end-use of sensitive materials, aiding investigations and incident response.
- Local communities near facilities using radioactive materials may benefit from a more transparent risk assessment process and improved security posture.
Who Bears the Cost
- NRC will incur IT and staffing costs to implement the Web Licensing System expansion, NS Tracking enhancements, and regulatory updates.
- Licensees with Category 3 licenses face new or intensified compliance obligations, including data accuracy and reporting.
- Vendors will bear verification costs and potential delays associated with purchaser screening.
- Industry associations and small businesses may incur system integration and training costs to adapt to new processes.
- Ongoing regulatory oversight and audit activities may require additional resources for enforcement and compliance monitoring.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing rigorous security enhancements with the operational and cost burdens on licensees and vendors, while ensuring regulatory updates are timely and effective, presents a trade-off between rapid risk reduction and sustainable implementation.
The bill front-loads security enhancements by tying socioeconomic considerations directly to security decision-making and by expanding data collection and verification across licensing channels. That raises questions about how socioeconomic metrics will be defined, measured, and weighted in security decisions, and who bears responsibility for data collection and accuracy.
The reliance on centralized IT systems—Web Licensing and National Source Tracking—creates potential cybersecurity and interoperability risks that must be managed as a condition of implementation. While the intent is to close gaps identified by GAO, the practical challenge will be aligning disparate stakeholders (licensees, vendors, regulators) around new processes within a one-year timeline.
These tensions will require careful governance, funding, and technical controls to avoid disruptive compliance burdens while achieving stronger traceability and accountability.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.