This bill amends the Public Health Service Act to add a new Sec. 317W, establishing the continued implementation of the Climate and Health program by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It creates a stable, long-term funding stream and sets clear oversight guardrails.
The program’s core aims are to translate climate science for state, local, Tribal, and territorial health authorities, develop decision-support tools to boost preparedness, and position the CDC as a leading planner for climate-related public health impacts. These changes are designed to ensure public health agencies have actionable information and resources to anticipate and respond to climate-related health risks right now.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Secretary, through the CDC Director, will continue to implement the Climate and Health program (317W) to translate climate science for jurisdictions, develop decision-support tools, and lead planning for climate-related health impacts.
Who It Affects
State, local, Tribal, and territorial health departments; public health practitioners; and communities vulnerable to climate-related health risks.
Why It Matters
It formalizes ongoing support for climate-health work, standardizes federal leadership, and creates mechanisms (funding, reporting) to ensure continuity and accountability for climate-health initiatives.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Climate and Health Protection Act inserts a new provision into the Public Health Service Act to maintain the Climate and Health program under the CDC. The Secretary, acting through the CDC Director, must continue implementing the program through the National Center for Environmental Health (or any successor) with three primary purposes: translate climate change science for state, local, Tribal, and territorial health authorities and communities; develop decision-support tools to improve climate preparedness; and lead public-health planning for climate impacts.
In addition, if a successor program is created, the Secretary must notify Congress in writing about any transfer or funds reallocation to establish it. The bill also authorizes a dedicated funding level—$110,000,000 for fiscal year 2026 and every year thereafter—and prohibits these funds from being transferred or reprogrammed to another Secretary-administered program.
The result is a stable federal commitment to climate-health work with explicit oversight and safeguarding of the funding stream.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds Sec. 317W to the Public Health Service Act to create the Climate and Health Program.
Authorization of $110,000,000 is set for FY2026 and every subsequent year.
The program requires translation of climate science to state/local/Tribal/territorial health authorities and communities.
Congress must be notified in writing for any successor program or fund transfers.
Funds cannot be transferred or reprogrammed to other programs.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Continuation of Climate and Health Program
The Secretary, via the CDC Director, shall continue implementing the Climate and Health program carried out by the National Center for Environmental Health or any successor program. The purpose is to translate climate change science to state, local, Tribal, and territorial governments and communities, create decision-support tools to bolster climate preparedness, and lead planning for public health impacts of climate change.
Notifications to Congress on Succession or Reprogramming
If the program is superseded by a successor, the Secretary must submit a written notification to Congress detailing the transfer or reprogramming of funds to establish the successor program. This creates a formal accountability mechanism for major program changes within the climate-health portfolio.
Authorization of Appropriations and Limitations
There are authorized to be appropriated $110,000,000 to carry out the program for FY2026 and each fiscal year thereafter. None of these funds may be transferred or reprogrammed by the Secretary to carry out another program administered by the Secretary, ensuring the climate-health effort remains protected and dedicated.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State health departments will gain ongoing access to climate-health translational resources and guidance to inform local policy and practice.
- Tribal health departments will receive culturally appropriate climate-health planning resources and technical support.
- Territorial health agencies will obtain dedicated support for climate risk assessment and response planning.
- The National Center for Environmental Health and CDC will maintain leadership of the program and its mission continuity.
- Communities at risk from climate-related health hazards will benefit from the program’s planning and tools that improve resilience.
Who Bears the Cost
- The federal government must provide the $110M annual appropriation, creating a stable but sizeable federal cost.
- Taxpayers bear the cost of the dedicated climate-health funding, with potential opportunity costs for other programs competing for resources.
- State, local, tribal, and territorial governments may face administrative and coordination costs to implement new or updated guidance and tools.
- There is reduced flexibility to reallocate funds within the broader HHS portfolio due to the reprogramming prohibition.
- CDC and related agencies may incur ongoing administrative costs to manage reporting requirements and oversight for the program.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is maintaining stable, protected funding for climate-health work while preserving enough flexibility to reallocate resources in response to shifting scientific priorities or urgent health needs. The bill leans toward continuity and oversight, potentially at the cost of adaptive agility.
The bill secures a durable funding stream and federal leadership for climate-health work, but it also imposes rigidity. By prohibiting reprogramming of funds to other programs and requiring explicit congressional notification for any successor program, the legislation prioritizes continuity and oversight over flexibility.
That balance could slow rapid pivots in response to emerging climate-health needs or new scientific priorities if they arise within a different public-health context. The delegated authority to translate climate science and develop decision-support tools will depend on the effectiveness of intergovernmental coordination across diverse jurisdictions, and the sufficiency of the $110 million annual appropriation to support evolving climate-health demands.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.