The bill reauthorizes the Project Safe Neighborhoods Grant Program Authorization Act of 2018 for fiscal years 2026 through 2030, and it updates definitions to include new roles such as crime analysts and law enforcement assistants. It also broadens the set of permissible uses for grant funds to cover hiring crime analysts, overtime for officers and prosecutors, and technology purchases that support violent-crime reduction efforts.
In addition, the act creates a new Task Force Support provision to bolster multi-jurisdictional collaboration, and it extends the program’s authorization period. Finally, the bill requires the Attorney General to submit annual transparency reports detailing funding, outreach, and violent crime outcomes in PSN areas to Congress.
At a Glance
What It Does
Reauthorizes the PSN Grant Program through fiscal years 2026–2030 and expands eligible uses to include crime analysts, overtime, and technology. It adds a Task Force Support provision to aid multi‑jurisdictional efforts and requires annual transparency reporting.
Who It Affects
Federal, state, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies receiving PSN grants, along with prosecutors’ offices and multi‑jurisdictional task forces, and communities affected by violent crime.
Why It Matters
It modernizes the PSN framework for data-driven policing, increases enforcement capacity, and introduces regular reporting to improve accountability and program governance.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill updates and extends the Project Safe Neighborhoods program, codifying a longer funding horizon and updating who can participate and how funds are spent. It redefines terms to recognize crime analysts and law enforcement assistants as official grant-supported roles, which clarifies who can be funded under the program.
By doing this, agencies can build more sophisticated analytical capabilities and more robust support for investigations.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill extends the PSN grant authorization to fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
It adds hiring crime analysts to the list of permissible grant-funded activities.
It authorizes overtime for law enforcement officers and prosecutors under the program.
It allows funding for technology purchases to support violent crime reduction.
It creates a Task Force Support provision to bolster multi‑jurisdictional collaboration and adds annual transparency reporting.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings and program scope
Section 2 sets out the baseline purpose and structure of the PSN program, noting its nationwide reach across all districts and its four core components: community engagement, prevention and intervention, focused and strategic enforcement, and accountability. The findings frame the program as a coordinated federal‑state‑local effort designed to identify and address the most pressing crime problems in communities.
Definitions and funding uses (reauthorization)
Section 3 reauthorizes the program and modifies definitions by adding ‘crime analyst’ and ‘law enforcement assistant’ to the roster of personnel involved in PSN work. It also expands the uses of grant funds to include hiring crime analysts, funding overtime for officers and prosecutors, and purchasing technology to aid violent-crime reduction efforts. The section also updates the authorization window to fiscal years 2026–2030.
Task Force Support
Section 4 establishes the Officer Ella Grace French and Sergeant Jim Smith Task Force Support Act of 2025 as part of the program, and it expands the grant’s permissible support to multi‑jurisdictional task forces. The change is intended to strengthen coordination across jurisdictions and improve the efficacy of joint interventions against violent crime.
Transparency and reporting
Section 5 requires the Attorney General to report annually to congressional Judiciary committees. The report must detail, for each PSN area, expenditure of funds, community outreach activities, and a description of violent-crime offenses (including murder, non‑negligent manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault) within the prior year.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Justice across all five countries.
Explore Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Local and state law enforcement agencies in PSN districts gain access to grant funds for crime analysts and for staff support in multi‑jurisdictional task forces, enabling more data‑driven policing and coordinated interventions.
- Prosecutors’ offices receive funding for overtime and to hire law enforcement assistants, increasing investigative and prosecutorial capacity.
- Crime analysts employed by participating agencies gain formal recognition and funding to perform data synthesis, threat assessment, and action planning.
- Tribal law enforcement partners can participate more effectively through enhanced collaboration and task-force activities.
- Communities in high-violence neighborhoods benefit from more targeted, coordinated enforcement and outreach efforts enabled by the expanded program.
Who Bears the Cost
- Local, state, and Tribal law enforcement agencies may incur costs associated with overtime, hiring additional staff (crime analysts and law enforcement assistants), and technology purchases.
- Administrative and compliance costs for administering grant funds and reporting requirements fall on state or local agencies and their grant offices.
- The Office of the Attorney General bears new workload to compile and submit annual program reports across PSN areas, which may require additional resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing expanded funding and staffing with accountable, data-driven outcomes across diverse jurisdictions—while maintaining focus on violent-crime reduction and ensuring consistent implementation—presents a central trade‑off between capability and measurement.
The bill’s expansion of eligible uses and creation of multi‑jurisdictional task forces raises questions about governance, oversight, and outcome measurement. While extending the authorization period and broadening staff roles can increase capability, it also heightens the risk of misallocation or uneven implementation across jurisdictions.
The mandatory annual reporting improves transparency, but it relies on the accuracy and timeliness of local data collection and reporting practices, which vary. The law’s success will depend on how well agencies integrate new roles (crime analysts, law enforcement assistants) with existing enforcement and prevention strategies, and how effectively the data generated is translated into actionable policy or policing improvements.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.