Codify — Article

Deport Alien Gang Members Act Expands Grounds for Deportation

Defines a 'criminal gang' and creates a formal designation framework to remove or detain gang-affiliated aliens, with asylum and relief restrictions.

The Brief

The Deport Alien Gang Members Act adds a new definition of 'criminal gang' to the Immigration and Nationality Act and creates corresponding inadmissibility and deportability grounds for aliens who are or have been members or associates of such gangs. It also establishes a DHS-led designation process for criminal gangs, with notice, Federal Register publication, and an administrative record, plus review and revocation procedures.

Beyond designation, the bill tightens enforcement through mandatory detention for gang-associated aliens and restricts certain forms of relief, including asylum and temporary protected status, for these individuals.

At a Glance

What It Does

Adds a new definition of 'criminal gang' to INA 101(a)(53) and embeds grounds of inadmissibility (212(a)(2)(J)) and deportability (237(a)(2)(G)) for aliens who are, or have been, gang members or their associates. Creates a DHS-led process to designate criminal gangs (Sec. 220) with a formal record, review, and revocation mechanisms.

Who It Affects

Aliens seeking admission or relief who are linked to criminal gangs; DHS personnel implementing designation and detention; immigration judges and removal proceedings; federal agencies involved in designation and review; and individuals subjected to potential detention and restricted asylum or TPS options.

Why It Matters

This bill changes who can be deemed removable or inadmissible based on gang affiliation, introduces a formal, auditable designation process, and broadens detention and relief restrictions. It signals a shift toward more centralized, fast-tracked enforcement of gang-associated immigration cases and raises questions about due process and the scope of relief in removal proceedings.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The Act begins by adding a formal definition of 'criminal gang' to the immigration law. A gang is defined as a group of five or more people with as one of its primary purposes the commission of a listed set of offenses (ranging from drug offenses to weapons, fraud, human trafficking, and violent crimes).

The offenses can be committed anywhere and at any time, and a group can be designated as a gang by the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, if they meet these criteria. Once designated, the group can be reviewed and potentially revoked, with process for notification, public listing, and judicial review.

The designation process also allows for classification and protective handling of information in the record, including classified material, and requires publication in the Federal Register.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill adds a defined 'criminal gang' of at least five people with ongoing offenses linked to specified crimes to INA 101(a)(53).

2

Aliens who are or have been gang members or who promote, aid, or participate in gang activities are inadmissible and/or deportable under the new grounds (INA 212(a)(2)(J) and 237(a)(2)(G)).

3

A new designation mechanism (Sec. 220) allows DHS, with AG input, to designate gangs, subject to notice, Federal Register publication, and an administrative record, with review and revocation provisions.

4

Designation can be reviewed and revoked on change in circumstances or for national security/enforcement reasons; judicial review is available in the D.C. Circuit under specified procedures.

5

The bill expands mandatory detention for gang-affiliated aliens and tightens eligibility for asylum, TPS, and other relief for such individuals, while introducing annual detention counts to Congress.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short Title

This section names the act the Deport Alien Gang Members Act. It provides the formal label used in any citations and references and sets the baseline for the bill's scope within immigration policy.

Section 2

Grounds of inadmissibility and deportability for alien gang members

Section 2 adds a new definition of 'criminal gang' to INA 101(a)(53), tying membership or participation in such gangs to inadmissibility (INA 212(a)(2)(J)) and deportability (INA 237(a)(2)(G)). The offenses enumerated encompass drugs, firearms, human trafficking, fraud and identity-related crimes, violence, and related conduct, with the capacity to apply regardless of where offenses occurred. The section also extends to conspiratorial activity and to aliens seeking entry for gang-related purposes.

Section 220

Designation of criminal gangs

This section authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, to designate a group of five or more persons as a criminal gang if they meet INA 101(a)(53). It requires advance notification to legislative leaders and committees, publication in the Federal Register, and creation of an administrative record (including handling of classified information). It also details revocation procedures, petitions for revocation, publication of determinations, and a framework for reviewing designations.

6 more sections
Section 220(e)

Mandatory detention of gang members

Section 220 adds mandatory detention provisions for aliens designated as gang members or associated with gangs, modifying existing INA detention rules and requiring detention in removal proceedings when a person is described under 212(a)(2)(J) or 237(a)(2)(G). It also requires an annual DHS report on detentions to Congress.

Section 2(f)

Claims based on gang affiliation

This subsection modifies asylum and related relief provisions so that aliens described in 212(a)(2)(J)(i) and 237(a)(2)(G)(i) are ineligible for asylum or other relief. It tightens eligibility criteria for relief, ensuring gang association limits practical avenues for relief and stays consistent with the broader removal framework.

Section 244

Temporary Protected Status

The TPS framework is updated to reference the new gang-affiliation restrictions, with related changes to the treatment of protected status in light of 212(a)(2)(J) and 237(a)(2)(G) designations, and to adjust eligibility and processing under the Secretary’s authority.

Section 101(a)(27)(J)(iii)

Special Immigrant Juvenile Visas

This section tightens SIV eligibility by barring any alien described in 212(a)(2)(J) or 237(a)(2)(G) from obtaining immigration benefits under the SIV subparagraph, thereby limiting pathways for gang-associated minors.

Section 212(d)(5)

Parole

Parole provisions are adjusted so that aliens described in 212(a)(2)(J) will face tighter conditions to obtain parole, including requirements related to cooperation with law enforcement and the necessity of government-held status for the alien’s parole.

Section 2(j) and 2(k)

Ineligibility for other relief and effective date

The act clarifies that aliens described by the new gang-related grounds are ineligible for other immigration relief, and it establishes that all amendments take effect on enactment, applying to acts both before and after the date of enactment.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Immigration across all five countries.

Explore Immigration in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Department of Homeland Security and its enforcement arms gain a formal, auditable process to designate criminal gangs and to remove or detain gang-affiliated aliens.
  • The Department of Justice and the Attorney General are included in the designation framework, facilitating enforcement coordination and legal oversight of removals.
  • Immigration judges and the removal system gain predictable, codified grounds for detention and denial of certain relief, which can streamline certain decision-making.
  • Communities affected by gang activity may see reduced violence and risk due to faster designation, detention, and removal of gang-associated individuals.
  • Law enforcement and national security agencies benefit from a clarified framework for identifying and processing high-risk aliens tied to criminal gangs.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Aliens designated as gang members and their families face new admissibility and relief restrictions and potential detention, with proportional impacts on due process and access to asylum or other relief.
  • Gangs or networks designated as criminal gangs may incur stigma, increased enforcement attention, and potential legal challenges to designations.
  • Federal agencies (DHS and DOJ) incur administrative costs from maintaining the designation process, records, and review procedures, including handling of classified information.
  • U.S. immigration courts and administrative bodies face higher caseloads and potential expansion of detention-related proceedings and petitions for revocation.
  • Judicial system resources may be affected by expedited or expedited-review processes for designation challenges and revocation determinations.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is whether a centralized, rapid designation framework with broad removal and detention powers can effectively combat gang activity without compromising due process, transparency, or access to relief for the individuals affected.

The bill creates a formal, government-wide mechanism to designate criminal gangs and to impose inadmissibility, deportability, and detention consequences on gang-associated aliens. A central tension is balancing the government's interest in disrupting organized crime with due process protections, the risk of overbroad or opaque designations (including use of classified information), and the potential chilling effect on asylum and relief programs for vulnerable individuals.

The procedural requirements—advance notification, Federal Register publication, an administrative record, and judicial review—help, but the reliance on secrecy for certain evidence could undermine transparency. Additionally, expanding mandatory detention and limiting relief for gang-affiliated aliens may raise constitutional questions if detentions become indefinite or apply too broadly without robust safeguards.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.