The bill amends title 38 to give the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a formal Partial Claim Program: the VA may purchase a portion of a guaranteed home loan to prevent or resolve default, take a subordinate secured interest in the property, and require servicers to perform tasks needed to establish the partial claim. It also requires a mandatory sequence of loss-mitigation options that holders must offer veterans before the VA may buy an entire loan and tightens administrative standards for payments and post-payment audits.
Why it matters: the measure creates an alternative to foreclosure that could preserve veteran homeownership and limit insurance payouts, but it also places new operational and compliance responsibilities on holders and the VA and changes the legal posture of VA decisions by making many of them final and non-reviewable. The bill further includes a short-term funding increase for homeless-veteran services and a reporting requirement on veterans’ access to real-estate representation.
At a Glance
What It Does
Authorizes the VA to make partial claims—purchasing part of a guaranteed loan and taking a subordinate lien—to cure arrearages and avert foreclosure, and requires holders to follow a mandatory loss-mitigation sequence before the VA can acquire an entire loan. The bill also creates processing standards tied to holder certifications, mandates random post-payment audits, and limits judicial review of certain VA decisions.
Who It Affects
Veterans with VA-guaranteed home loans that are in default or at imminent risk of default, mortgage holders and servicers of VA-guaranteed loans, the VA’s loan administration office (which must implement the program and audits), and providers of homeless-veteran services who receive increased appropriations.
Why It Matters
It makes partial-purchase remediation a formal VA tool and conditions other recovery powers on exhausting mitigation options, shifting the balance away from immediate foreclosure. For servicers this means new workflow, documentation, and potential compensation requirements; for the VA it means new operational, audit, and budgetary responsibilities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill edits the VA’s loan-claim authority to let the Secretary step in before foreclosure in more structured ways. Under the amended 38 U.S.C. § 3732 the Secretary may pay a loan holder the amount needed to avoid foreclosure, require the holder and borrower to sign documents that give the VA a secured interest in the property, and require holders to take practical steps (prepare and record documents, place loans in forbearance) to implement those payments.
The statute also allows the Secretary to set processing standards that rely on a holder’s certification of compliance and to perform random post-payment audits to verify those certifications.
A new mandatory loss-mitigation rule is added: the Secretary must prescribe a required sequence of mitigation options that a holder must offer a veteran before the VA may purchase the entire guaranteed loan. The amendment to section 3720 bars the Secretary from exercising certain authorities for guaranteed loans until that mitigation sequence is complete.
The statute makes many Secretary decisions under these authorities final and not subject to judicial review.The centerpiece is a new statutory Partial Claim Program. The VA may purchase a portion of indebtedness on a guaranteed primary-residence loan that is in default or at imminent risk of default, and in exchange the VA receives a secured interest subordinate to the original guaranteed first lien.
The holder must apply VA payments first to arrearages (which can include taxes, insurance, homeowner dues), and the Secretary can require the holder to perform the administrative work to establish the partial claim and compensate the holder for those services. The VA may contract with servicers to manage partial-claim accounts and must use state or local foreclosure procedures if the VA forecloses on a lien arising from a partial claim.Operationally the statute limits how many partial claims can be made per loan except in narrow disaster circumstances, gives the Secretary discretion over terms and a five-year window to make partial claims after enactment, and preserves other existing VA authorities where they are consistent with these new provisions.
The bill also directs the Secretary to report a strategy to ensure veterans are not disadvantaged in securing real-estate representation and increases authorized appropriations for comprehensive homeless-veteran services for a multiyear period.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Partial Claim Program caps a single partial-claim purchase at 25% of the unpaid principal balance at the time of purchase, with a special 30% cap for borrowers who missed payments between March 1, 2020, and May 1, 2025.
The Secretary may make only one partial claim per loan, except an additional partial claim is allowed if the borrower missed payments due to a presidentially declared major disaster or within 120 days after such a disaster.
Any decision by the Secretary under the new partial-claim and certain loss-mitigation authorities is final and not subject to judicial review; payments may be processed based on holder certification but are subject to random post-payment audits.
Amounts paid by the VA for a partial claim must be applied by the holder first to arrearages (including taxes, insurance, homeowner dues) and are not counted against the borrower’s remaining VA guaranty entitlement or applied to the guaranteed portion of the loan.
The authority to make partial claims terminates five years after enactment, and foreclosure of any VA lien created by a partial claim must follow applicable State or local law.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Names the measure the 'VA Home Loan Program Reform Act.' This has no substantive effect but frames the statute for citations and implementing regulations.
VA power to prevent foreclosure; mandatory loss-mitigation sequence
Amends § 3732 to replace outdated references to 'obligation' with 'loan' and expands the Secretary’s authority to pay holders amounts necessary to avoid foreclosure, require execution of documents to secure the VA’s interest, require holders to place loans in forbearance, and impose operational duties on holders. The section authorizes the Secretary to set payment-processing standards that rely on holder certifications and requires random post-payment audits. It also adds a mandatory loss-mitigation sequence in new subsection (d) that holders must offer and complete for veterans before the Secretary may purchase an entire loan. Section 3720 is changed to prevent the Secretary from using certain recovery powers until that mitigation sequence is complete, creating a statutory pause on some remedies while mitigation is attempted.
Establishes a statutory Partial Claim Program and governing rules
Creates § 3737, authorizing the VA to purchase a portion of indebtedness on guaranteed primary-residence loans that are in default or at imminent risk of default. The VA receives a subordinate secured interest and the holder must apply the payment first to arrearages (including items like taxes and insurance). The statute sets quantitative limits and frequency rules for partial claims (caps tied to the unpaid principal balance, disaster exceptions, one-per-loan limit subject to limited exceptions), allows the VA to contract out servicing, requires appropriate compensation for holder actions, and specifies that foreclosure of a VA lien arising from a partial claim follows State or local law. The Secretary’s partial-claim decisions are made in sole discretion, are final, and the authority expires five years after enactment.
Report on veterans’ access to real-estate representation
Directs the Secretary to submit, within 90 days of enactment, a strategy report to congressional veterans’ committees describing steps to ensure veterans are not disadvantaged when seeking a real-estate agent or broker, including potential amendments to 38 C.F.R. § 36.4313. This is an implementation and compliance oversight requirement that could prompt regulatory or administrative policy changes.
Increased authorizations for homeless-veteran services
Amends 38 U.S.C. § 2016 to extend and increase authorized appropriations for comprehensive service programs for homeless veterans. The amendments replace an open-ended post-2015 authorization with specified funding levels for fiscal years through 2030, directing more short-term resources to these programs and changing the baseline the VA may plan against.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Housing across all five countries.
Explore Housing in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Veterans in default or at imminent risk of default — the partial-claim option and mandatory mitigation sequence create an additional tool to cure arrears and avoid foreclosure, which may preserve homeownership and reduce displacement.
- VA loan-servicing contractors and holders that prefer workout solutions — the law allows holders to receive VA payments to cure arrears and be compensated for administrative work, creating a defined revenue stream for workout activities.
- Homeless-veteran service providers and veterans experiencing homelessness — the bill increases authorized appropriations for comprehensive services, potentially expanding program capacity and funding stability in the near term.
- State and local jurisdictions — by requiring VA foreclosure proceedings on partial-claim liens to follow state or local law, the bill keeps foreclosure administration within existing local frameworks rather than centralizing it in federal courts.
Who Bears the Cost
- Mortgage holders and servicers — they must perform additional documentation, recording, and forbearance steps at the Secretary’s direction, comply with certification requirements, and submit to post-payment audits, raising operational and compliance costs.
- The Department of Veterans Affairs — VA will incur direct fiscal costs for purchasing partial claims, must build program operations (contracting, audits, servicing oversight), and absorb implementation burdens tied to the mandated mitigation sequence and reporting requirements.
- Secondary market participants and investors — the creation of VA subordinate interests and partial-purchase rules could alter loan-level economics, affect pooling/servicing agreements, and complicate loan sale/securitization processes.
- Taxpayers (indirectly) — placing the VA in the position of purchasing loan principal increases near-term outlays that may affect the guaranty fund and VA budget priorities, despite the program’s intent to reduce long-term claim payouts.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits two legitimate goals against each other: preserving veteran homeowners and avoiding immediate foreclosure versus limiting taxpayer exposure and preventing moral hazard and operational complexity; it solves the first by concentrating discretionary power in the Secretary (and making those decisions final) but in doing so raises accountability, legal, and market-stability questions that no single mechanism in the bill fully resolves.
The bill creates practical and legal tensions. Operationally, the VA must stand up a program that values partial purchases, tracks subordinate liens, contracts servicers, administers compensatory payments to holders, and delivers credible audit oversight—tasks that require staffing, systems, and near-term budget authority.
The five-year sunset limits long-term exposure but may incentivize rapid use of authority early on, complicating program evaluation and creating transition liabilities when the authority expires.
Legally, the statute makes many Secretary decisions final and non-reviewable while expanding discretionary spending authority and relying on holder certifications. That finality reduces litigation risk for expedited workouts but raises administrative-law and due-process concerns; parties may still pursue collateral challenges (e.g., contract, takings, or state-law claims), and interplay with state foreclosure rules could produce litigation over lien priority and enforceability.
The subordinate lien mechanism helps preserve veterans’ primary-lien priority but leaves open how private investors and servicers will treat VA-held subordinate interests in pooled or securitized loans.
Finally, the program creates possible moral-hazard effects: offering a capped partial claim that covers arrears could encourage strategic default or delay in repayment for some borrowers and could change servicer incentives. The bill tries to mitigate abuse with one-claim limits, disaster exceptions, audits, and a sunset, but it leaves unanswered how the VA will set guardrails (underwriting for who qualifies, valuation methodology for partial purchases, and reporting/metrics for success).
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.