The bill amends two chapters of the U.S. Code to extend federal disability retirement eligibility to National Guard members who incur disabilities while performing State Active Duty. It adds State Active Duty as a qualifying basis for retirement under 10 U.S.C. §1204 and imposes a limitation to prevent duplicating any other federal or state benefit for the same disability.
In addition, the bill creates a new health-care entitlement under 38 U.S.C. for Guard members who incur disabilities on State Active Duty, allowing hospital care and medical services to treat the disability and related conditions, subject to appropriations and a requirement to exhaust all third-party remedies first. The definition of State Active Duty aligns with the term as used in 38 U.S.C. §4303.
The package thus links disability retirement with a VA-funded care pathway for Guard members serving at the state level.
At a Glance
What It Does
The act adds State Active Duty to the list of disability-qualifying conditions for retirement under 10 U.S.C. §1204 and creates a new health-care entitlement under 38 U.S.C. §1789A for such injuries, with funding and third-party-payer safeguards.
Who It Affects
National Guard members who incur disabilities while on State Active Duty, VA health-care facilities and networks, DoD/VA administrators, and state National Guard units.
Why It Matters
It closes a policy gap by ensuring both disability retirement eligibility and VA-backed medical care for injuries sustained during state service, while guarding against duplicative benefits and uncertain funding.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill tightens the boundary between service-connected disability retirement and health care for National Guard members who suffer disabilities while performing State Active Duty. First, it amends Section 1204 of title 10 to recognize State Active Duty as a qualifying basis for retirement due to a disability.
It also adds a limitation: retired pay attributable to this disability cannot duplicate any other federal or state benefit the member already receives, ensuring no double-dipping in compensation. The second major pillar is a new health-care entitlement under 38 U.S.C. §1789A.
This provision allows hospital care and medical services for disabilities incurred on State Active Duty, to be provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, but only to the extent appropriations permit. It also requires that the care be paid only after exhausting all reasonable third-party remedies, including health-plan contracts.
Finally, the policy defines State Active Duty by reference to the existing definition in section 4303 of title 38. In short, Guardsmen injured on state service would, subject to funding, be eligible for both disability retirement and VA-backed health care, with guardrails to avoid duplicate benefits and to ensure funds are available.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds State Active Duty to the disability retirement qualifying conditions under 10 U.S.C. §1204.
Retired pay under this provision may be reduced to avoid duplicating any other federal or state benefit.
A new 38 U.S.C. §1789A authorizes VA hospital care and medical services for disabilities incurred on State Active Duty.
Care under §1789A is limited by appropriations and by a requirement to exhaust third-party remedies first.
State Active Duty is defined consistently with 38 U.S.C. §4303.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This Act may be cited as the Supporting Disabled National Guardsmen Act. It sets the official name for the measure and signals the scope of the changes to the disability and health-care framework for National Guard members serving on State Active Duty.
Eligibility for retirement based on disability incurred on State Active Duty
Section 1204 of title 10 is amended to add State Active Duty (as defined in section 4303 of title 38) as a qualifying basis for retirement due to a disability incurred during such duty. The bill adds a new subsection (a) and a new subsection (b) that imposes a limitation: retired pay paid to a member retired under this provision must be reduced if duplicative with any other federal or state benefit. This creates a guardrail to prevent double-dipping while preserving a net-earning structure for Guardsmen who incur service-connected disabilities on state missions.
Health care for National Guard members incurring disability on State Active Duty
A new § 1789A is added to Subchapter VIII of chapter 17 of title 38. It provides that a National Guard member who incurs a disability while performing State Active Duty is eligible for hospital care and medical services funded by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to treat the disability and related conditions. The Secretary may furnish care only to the extent and amount provided in advance by appropriations acts, and reimbursement may occur only after the individual or provider exhausts all third-party remedies. The definition of State Active Duty follows the meaning in section 4303 of title 38.
Clerical amendment to the table of sections
The table of sections in chapter 38 is amended to insert the new § 1789A after §1789, ensuring the health-care provision appears in the official index alongside other VA care authorities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- National Guard members who incur a disability while on State Active Duty, who gain disability retirement eligibility and access to VA health care
- Family members of those Guardsmen, who gain financial stability and access to care through the veteran-care framework
- The Department of Veterans Affairs, which gains a defined care path and payer structure for Guard-related disabilities
- State National Guard units and their leadership, which gain a formalized benefits ladder that can aid recruitment and retention
- Health-care providers and VA facilities that administer hospital care and clinical services under a defined funding and reimbursement mechanism
Who Bears the Cost
- Members’ retirement pay may be reduced to avoid duplicating benefits, reducing expected retirement income
- Federal government costs for VA health care delivery under §1789A, capped by annual appropriations
- Private health insurers and third-party payers, who must navigate the exhaustion requirement before reimbursement
- Administrative and coordination costs borne by DoD, VA and state National Guard entities in implementing the new benefits framework
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between extending meaningful, coordinated support for Guardsmen injured on state missions and limiting federal outlays through duplication rules and funding caps, which could delay or constrain access to care or retirement benefits if appropriations lag or if third-party payers complicate reimbursement.
The bill creates a robust fault line between expanded care and fiscal discipline. On one side, it improves protection for Guardsmen who serve on state missions by aligning disability retirement eligibility with a health-care entitlement that, in theory, follows the disability into civilian life through VA facilities.
On the other side, the provisions embed explicit budget guardrails—retired pay reductions to avoid duplicating benefits and a hard appropriations cap on VA care that can be provided, plus a mandatory order to exhaust third-party remedies before payment. The combination of federal health-care funding with state-active-duty service raises questions about administrative responsibility, interagency coordination, and the practical impact on service members who transition between state and federal benefit regimes.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.