The Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act would abolish the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and each Federal Reserve Bank, and would repeal the Federal Reserve Act, effective one year after enactment. The bill sets a one-year dissolution window for the Fed’s leadership to wind up operations, directs the Office of Management and Budget to liquidate the Fed’s assets, and directs that net proceeds be transferred to the Treasury’s General Fund.
Why this matters: the bill replaces the United States’ statutory central banking framework with a statutory liquidation process and a Treasury assumption of liabilities. That shift substitutes executive-branch asset management and Treasury liability assumption for a standing central bank structure — a legal and operational change with immediate implications for payment systems, monetary operations, and fiscal exposure.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill abolishes the Board of Governors and each Federal Reserve Bank and repeals the Federal Reserve Act, effective one year after enactment. During that year the Fed’s Chairman must wind up affairs while OMB liquidates assets and transfers net proceeds to the Treasury, which assumes outstanding liabilities.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include the Board of Governors and Federal Reserve Banks and their employees, the Treasury Department (which inherits liabilities and receives asset proceeds), member banks whose Reserve Bank stock is redeemed, and the Office of Management and Budget tasked with liquidation.
Why It Matters
The bill replaces the statutory central bank with a liquidation-and-assumption process that moves central-bank assets and liabilities onto the Treasury’s balance sheet, creating potential fiscal exposure and operational discontinuities in core central banking functions such as payments, liquidity provision, and supervision.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill is short and strictly procedural: it declares that, one year after the Act becomes law, the Board of Governors and each Federal Reserve Bank will be abolished and the Federal Reserve Act repealed. It does not create a successor institution to perform monetary policy, payment-system settlement, lender-of-last-resort functions, or bank supervision; instead, it prescribes a winding-down process for the existing entities.
During the one-year dissolution window the bill gives the Federal Reserve Chairman a narrow, transitional authority: manage employees and handle assets and liabilities solely to wind up operations, and take other closure actions subject to Treasury approval. Separately, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget must liquidate all Federal Reserve assets “in an orderly manner” so as to be as expeditious as practical while maximizing the return to the Treasury.
After OMB satisfies accepted claims and redeems Federal Reserve Bank stock, net liquidation proceeds are to be deposited in the Treasury’s General Fund.The Secretary of the Treasury is expressly required to assume all outstanding liabilities of the Board and Reserve Banks at abolition, including retirement and benefit obligations, and those liabilities are payable from the amounts transferred into the General Fund under the liquidation process. The statute also appropriates those deposited amounts for the purpose of paying these liabilities until they are satisfied.
Finally, the bill requires a joint report from Treasury and OMB 18 months after enactment describing implementation actions taken and any unresolved matters.The statute therefore substitutes a one‑year administrative unwinding and a Treasury-backed liability assumption for the Federal Reserve’s ongoing institutional role. It leaves open, in statutory silence, how core central-bank functions continue or who will perform them once abolition is effective; implementation detail is delegated to the Chairman (for wind-down actions), OMB (for liquidation), and the Treasury (for liability assumption).
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill abolishes the Board of Governors and every Federal Reserve Bank and repeals the Federal Reserve Act, effective at the end of a 1-year period after enactment.
During the 1-year wind-down the Chairman of the Federal Reserve is authorized to manage employees and the Board’s and banks’ assets and liabilities only for the purpose of winding up operations, subject to Treasury approval.
The Director of the Office of Management and Budget must liquidate all Federal Reserve assets “in an orderly manner” and with the dual aims of expeditious liquidation and maximizing return to the Treasury.
After satisfying accepted claims and redeeming Federal Reserve Bank stock, the net proceeds from liquidation must be transferred to the Secretary of the Treasury and deposited in the General Fund of the Treasury.
The Secretary of the Treasury assumes all outstanding liabilities of the Board and Reserve Banks — including retirement and benefit obligations — and amounts deposited under the liquidation are appropriated to pay those liabilities; Treasury and OMB must provide a joint implementation report at 18 months.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the act’s citation as the “Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act.” This is procedural but indicates the bill’s sole, focused purpose: statutory abolition rather than amendment or partial reform.
Abolition and effective date
Declares that the Board of Governors and each Federal Reserve Bank are abolished, and that the Federal Reserve Act is repealed, effective one year after enactment. The fixed one-year runway is the bill’s central timing mechanism; it creates a statutory sunset for the existing central bank structure rather than an immediate termination.
Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act
Specifically repeals the Federal Reserve Act effective at the same one-year mark. Repeal eliminates the statutory authorities and governance framework that create the Fed’s monetary-policy, supervision, and payment-system roles, although the bill does not specify statutory replacements for those functions.
Management during the dissolution period
Grants the Fed Chairman limited authority during the dissolution year to manage employees and assets for winding up operations and to take other necessary winding-up actions with Treasury approval. Practically, this confines the Board’s activity to closure tasks and conditions those actions on the Secretary of the Treasury’s oversight.
Asset liquidation, liability assumption, and reporting
Directs OMB to liquidate all Federal Reserve assets in an orderly way aimed at speed and maximizing return; after claims accepted by OMB are paid and Reserve Bank stock redeemed, net proceeds transfer to the Treasury’s General Fund. Makes the Secretary of the Treasury responsible for all outstanding liabilities, including retirement and benefits, and appropriates deposited funds to satisfy those liabilities. Finally, it requires an 18‑month joint report from Treasury and OMB describing implementation and unresolved issues.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- U.S. Treasury and federal budget (administration of receipts) — the bill directs net proceeds from liquidation to the Treasury’s General Fund, increasing amounts available to the Treasury at least on paper and centralizing asset control under executive agencies.
- Holders of accepted claims and redeemed Federal Reserve Bank stock — the bill requires OMB to satisfy accepted claims and redeem member-bank stock during liquidation, providing a statutory route to payment and redemption.
- Former Federal Reserve employees for accrued compensation and benefits — the Chairman must provide for payment of compensation and benefits that accrue before an employee’s position is abolished, so affected employees have a statutory claim on those accrued amounts.
Who Bears the Cost
- U.S. taxpayers broadly — the Secretary of the Treasury assumes all outstanding liabilities of the Board and Reserve Banks and must pay retirement and benefit obligations from deposited proceeds, shifting fiscal exposure from an independent Fed balance sheet to the Treasury’s accounts.
- Office of Management and Budget and Treasury Department — OMB carries the operational responsibility to liquidate a complex portfolio of central-bank assets, and Treasury carries long-term liability administration and payment tasks, creating large administrative and execution burdens.
- Federal Reserve employees and systems after termination — although accrued benefits are protected for amounts that accrue before abolition, employees face job loss at abolition, and critical Fed-operated systems (payments settlement, reserve accounts, discount window) have no statutory successor identified, imposing operational discontinuity costs on private-sector participants and regulators.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between a political/legal objective — removing an independent central bank from the statute and folding its assets and liabilities into Treasury control — and the technical imperative to preserve continuity of complex monetary and payment functions and avoid market disruption; the bill resolves the legal question of abolition but not the operational question of who performs essential central-bank roles or how to unwind large, market-sensitive portfolios without destabilizing markets or exposing taxpayers to unpredictable losses.
The bill prescribes a mechanical closure — abolition, one‑year wind‑down, asset liquidation by OMB, and liability assumption by Treasury — but leaves enormous practical and legal gaps. The statute is silent about who will carry out core central-bank functions (monetary policy, lender-of-last-resort operations, federal funds settlement, custody of foreign reserves, payment-system services, and bank supervision) after abolition; those functions do not disappear in practice and the bill does not assign them.
That statutory silence raises immediate questions about continuity of payment and settlement systems, contract counterparties, and the legal status of obligations that reference the Federal Reserve Act or Fed facilities.
Implementation challenges are acute and technically complex. Valuing and liquidating Federal Reserve assets — including large portfolios of Treasury securities, agency debt and mortgage-backed securities, foreign currency reserves, and potential emergency lending facilities — risks market disruption if sales are mistimed or concentrated.
The bill directs OMB to balance speed and maximization of return, but those objectives can conflict: rapid liquidation tends to depress prices; slow sales prolong legal and operational uncertainty. The conversion of off‑balance sheet emergency facilities and outstanding intraday or intrabank settlement exposures into Treasury liabilities will require detailed reconciliation and may produce disputes over accepted claims.
Finally, appropriating net proceeds to pay liabilities presumes proceeds will be sufficient; if they are not, the statute does not specify backstops beyond general Treasury authority, creating fiscal risk and legal questions about priority among creditors and claimants.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.