This bill directs the Secretary of Transportation to stand up a competitive Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging Grant Program to fund construction, installation, improvement, testing, and demonstration of wireless charging technologies for EVs. The program targets deployments in public settings — roads, parking lots, ports, airports — and emphasizes fleet, transit, and multi-weight-class vehicle applications.
The measure builds implementation guardrails: federal cost‑share limits, wage standards, Buy America compliance (with a waiver path), community engagement, training and workforce use of grant funds, and an annual reporting requirement. For planners and fleet operators, the bill aims to accelerate real‑world testing and interoperability work while channeling federal dollars toward domestic supply‑chain goals and equitable siting of pilot projects.
At a Glance
What It Does
Directs DOT, working with DOE, to run a competitive grant program that funds wireless (inductive and other plug‑free) charging projects and related testing, standards work, and safety evaluation. Grants may be used for builds along roads, in parking facilities, at ports and airports, and for fleet and transit applications.
Who It Affects
State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, metropolitan planning organizations, special purpose transport authorities, and transit agencies — either alone or in partnership — plus contractors, charging equipment suppliers, utilities, and vehicle fleet operators.
Why It Matters
The program focuses federal dollars on a nascent technology that could change fleet and transit operations, reduce battery size needs, and shift charging demand patterns, while attaching labor, domestic sourcing, and equity conditions that will shape procurement and project design.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act creates a new DOT‑led grant program, coordinated with the Department of Energy, to support wireless electric vehicle charging projects. Eligible projects explicitly include physical deployments (roadway‑based and parking‑area chargers), testing and interoperability work, performance and safety evaluation, and pilot demonstrations aimed at light, medium, and heavy vehicles as well as transit and fleet uses.
The bill also envisions both static (parking) and dynamic (charging while moving) deployments by referencing wireless and dynamic charging use cases.
Applicants must be public actors or partnered with public actors — states, localities, Tribes, MPOs, special purpose districts, and transit agencies — and the program prioritizes geographic diversity when selecting awards. Grant proceeds may cover workforce development and community engagement costs, meaning recipients can budget explicitly for training installation crews and for outreach to affected drivers and residents.
The law encourages projects that leverage non‑federal funding, including public‑private partnerships.Financial mechanics are explicit: the federal share is capped at 80 percent of project cost and individual grants cannot exceed $25 million. Congress authorizes $250 million to carry out the program.
The bill imposes Davis‑Bacon wage requirements on construction labor, requires recipients to adopt labor‑organizing neutrality policies and worker notice practices, and conditions funding on Buy America rules as applied under 49 U.S.C. 5323(j), subject to the same waiver mechanisms available to DOT.Selection priorities lean toward non‑disruptive, cost‑effective, and weather‑resilient designs; projects that support low‑income, underserved, and disadvantaged communities; interoperability development and testing; and fleet and heavy‑duty vehicle deployments expected to yield substantial fuel and emissions reductions. DOT must publish an annual progress report to Congress detailing recipients, amounts, pilot progress, safety results, workforce impacts, environmental metrics, and recommendations for future funding and best practices.
DOT may also deliver technical assistance to recipients at its discretion.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill authorizes $250 million to carry out the Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging Grant Program, funds to remain available until expended.
Federal funding may cover up to 80% of project costs, and individual awards are capped at $25 million.
Recipients must comply with Davis‑Bacon prevailing wage rules for laborers and mechanics on funded projects.
Grant recipients (and their contractors) must adopt explicit neutrality policies toward labor organizing and provide worker notices about NLRA rights.
Buy America applies to funded projects under 49 U.S.C. 5323(j), but the Secretary may grant waivers using the same procedures DOT has for other programs.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Creates the Wireless EV Charging Grant Program
This section formally establishes the Program and sets its purpose: to award competitive grants for construction, installation, improvement, testing, interoperability work, and safety/performance evaluation of wireless charging technologies. For implementers, the definition of covered activities is broad — the Program can fund both infrastructure deployments and technical development work, giving DOT latitude to fund pilots that combine on‑road hardware and laboratory or field testing.
Secretary duties: eligible locations, reporting, and technical assistance
Section 4 lets DOT direct awards toward wiring along roads, parking lots, airports, and coastal/inland ports and requires coordination with DOE. Crucially, it requires an annual progress report to the relevant congressional committees that must describe recipients, funding amounts, pilot progress, safety and technology outcomes, workforce impacts, and environmental effects — creating a statutory oversight and learning loop. DOT’s authority to provide technical assistance means smaller jurisdictions can receive implementation support beyond simple grant funding.
Eligible applicants, partnerships, and allowable grant uses
The statute limits direct eligibility to public or quasi‑public entities (states, local/Tribal/territorial governments, MPOs, special purpose districts, and transit agencies) but allows those entities to partner with private firms. It prioritizes geographic diversity in award selection and lets recipients use grant funds for workforce training and community engagement, which shifts some implementation focus onto public outreach and local hiring/training plans.
Cost share and award ceilings
Section 6 imposes an 80 percent federal cap on the federal share and a $25 million per‑project cap. Practically, applicants must assemble non‑federal matching funds — municipal budgets, state allocations, private sector contributions, or public‑private partnerships — and plan for projects sized to fit the cap. The caps drive program architecture toward mid‑sized pilots and merchantable first‑wave deployments rather than unlimited large system rollouts.
Selection priorities, labor requirements, and Buy America
This section lists 12 prioritization criteria — from non‑disruptive designs and equity to interoperability testing and fleet impacts — that DOT must use in grant selection. It also incorporates Davis‑Bacon prevailing wage rules and prescribes neutrality and worker‑notice policies for recipients and their contractors. Buy America compliance is mandated but with the same waiver authority DOT already uses under 49 U.S.C. 5323(j). Those labor and domestic‑sourcing conditions create compliance obligations that will shape procurement strategies and supplier selection.
Definitions
The bill defines ‘electric vehicle’ narrowly as a zero‑emission battery‑powered vehicle and defines ‘wireless charging’ to include inductive and other plug‑free methods. The statutory definitions help bound program scope — for example, hybrid or plug‑in hybrid vehicles not meeting the zero‑emission definition may fall outside intended uses — and affect how grantees craft technical specifications and eligible vehicle lists.
Authorization of appropriations
Congress authorizes $250 million to carry out the Act, available until expended. While authorization does not appropriate funds, the explicit dollar figure signals congressional intent for a modest pilot portfolio and informs applicants and agencies about likely program scale and fiscal planning.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Transit agencies and public fleets — the bill explicitly prioritizes transit and fleet applications, lowering capital barriers for pilot deployments that can reduce downtime, fuel use, and battery size requirements.
- State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments — eligible to apply directly and to receive technical assistance, enabling jurisdictions to run pilots without relying solely on private capital.
- Domestic manufacturers and installers — Buy America and the push for a resilient domestic supply chain increase demand for U.S. component makers, system integrators, and skilled installers.
- Workforce and training providers — grantees may use funds for training, creating opportunities for apprenticeships and local hiring tied to deployment and maintenance of wireless systems.
- Communities near high‑traffic corridors and disadvantaged neighborhoods — selection priorities require outreach and equity considerations, increasing the chance that pilots will target underserved areas.
Who Bears the Cost
- Local governments and grantee partners — must supply at least 20% matching funds and cover the administrative burden of compliance, outreach, and reporting.
- Contractors and suppliers — must comply with Davis‑Bacon wage rates and neutrality notice requirements, which may increase labor costs and administrative obligations on bids.
- Federal procurement and oversight offices — DOT will need to staff technical assistance, vet complex pilot proposals, manage Buy America waiver requests, and review annual reports, imposing program management costs.
- Private firms with foreign supply chains — Buy America mandates and preference raise compliance hurdles and may exclude some low‑cost foreign suppliers unless a waiver is granted.
- Utilities and grid operators — while not direct grantees, dynamic wireless charging pilots could shift demand patterns and require coordination or upgrades that place costs or operational burdens on utilities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between accelerating real‑world deployment and locking federal dollars into immature, potentially nonstandard technologies versus taking a slower, standards‑first approach that could delay practical learning; the bill favors learning through deployments while using procurement and labor conditions to steer outcomes, but that mix risks higher short‑term costs and procurement friction in exchange for faster operational experience.
The bill intentionally combines deployment funding with standards, testing, and safety reporting — a design that encourages rapid real‑world learning but creates timing and measurement challenges. Pilots will produce a wide variety of technical approaches (different inductive coil designs, air gaps, power levels, and traffic scenarios), which complicates cross‑project comparability and raises the bar for DOT’s technical evaluation capacity.
The requirement for annual reporting helps, but the statute leaves substantive metrics and evaluation methodology to DOT discretion, potentially creating inconsistent data across projects.
Buy America and prevailing wage conditions reflect domestic economic and labor priorities, but they interact awkwardly with an immature supply chain for wireless charging hardware. Strict domestic sourcing can increase upfront costs and slow procurement; the bill’s waiver path mitigates this but shifts the decision burden to DOT and may create uneven application.
The neutrality requirement offers protections for worker organizing but is atypical in infrastructure grant statutes and could create legal or contractual complexity in jurisdictions with diverse labor relationships. Finally, dynamic charging pilots — which may require roadside electrification and coordination with maintenance regimes and utilities — raise unresolved system‑integration questions around metering, billing, electromagnetic compatibility, roadside safety, and long‑term maintenance funding.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.