The bill codifies a targeted correction prompted by prior Customs rulings on the K389 Hole-N-One golf cart tires, which were classified under HTS 4011.69.00 with a duty rate of free. It directs U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to reliquidate the specified duty-paid entries at the rate applicable on each entry’s date and to refund the duties paid, with interest, not later than 90 days after enactment.
The affected entries are enumerated and tied to a particular importer group (Monitor Manufacturing Co. and associated importers), reflecting a narrow, rule-specific adjustment rather than a broad tariff reform. The measure relies on existing rulings NY N278164 (2016) and HQ H285180 (2017) and aligns reliquidation with those determinations.
At a Glance
What It Does
Directs CBP to reliquidate identified golf cart tire entries at the 4011.69.00 rate in effect on the entry date and to refund duties with interest within 90 days of enactment.
Who It Affects
CBP, the specific listed importers (notably Monitor Manufacturing Co. and affiliated entities), and the particular entries identified by date and port.
Why It Matters
Sets a clear, time-bound remedy for misclassified or late-liquidated entries in light of prior rulings, reducing retroactive risk for the named importers and clarifying treatment under HTS 4011.69.00.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section 1 lays out the factual background, citing two CBP rulings that classify the K389 Hole-N-One tires under HTS 4011.69.00 with a free duty rate and states that Congress endorses reliquidation in cases where liquidation occurred outside the normal 514 Act timeframe. The bill’s primary purpose is then expressed: to allow CBP to reverse, as needed, the duty treatment on those specific entries.
Section 2 creates the operative mechanism. CBP must reliquidate each listed entry at the applicable rate on its date of entry and must refund the corresponding duties, plus interest, within 90 days of enactment.
This provides a concrete deadline and a concrete remedy, ensuring that previously paid duties tied to those rulings are returned to the importers. The text anchors the remedy in statutory authority rather than administrative discretion.Section 3 defines the universe of affected entries.
The reliquidation target comprises a long list of Monitor Manufacturing Co. entries (and related monitor-related importers), including entry numbers, dates, and ports of entry, demonstrating that the relief is tailored to a defined set of shipments linked to prior rulings. This is not a generic tax adjustment; it is a narrowly bounded correction tied to a single product family and its import history.Section 4 notes the procedural and legal boundaries.
The reliquidation is framed as compliant with the Tariff Act of 1930’s section 514, but the bill provides a specific override for these entries, ensuring the 90-day refund timeline is executable. Overall, the measure blends existing trade-law mechanisms with a tightly scoped relief to address past liquidations tied to defined rulings.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill directs CBP to reliquidate listed entries at the 4011.69.00 rate on the entry date.
Duties paid on the listed entries must be refunded plus interest within 90 days of enactment.
A defined set of Monitor Manufacturing Co. entries (and related importers) are the sole beneficiaries.
Rulings NY N278164 and HQ H285180 underpin the reliquidation basis.
The bill overrides normal 514 liquidation timing for these specific cases.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings and Sense of Congress
Section 1 records the governing rationale, noting the cited CBP rulings that classify the tires as duty-free and explicitly states the sense of Congress that CBP should reliquidate those entries when liquidation occurred outside the 514 window.
Reliquidation and Refund of Duties
This section authorizes reliquidation and mandates refunds of duties with interest, to be completed within 90 days of enactment, anchoring the financial remedy in a firm deadline.
Affected Entries
A detailed, enumerated list defines the entries to be reliquidated, tying the relief to specific importer numbers, dates, and ports, showing the measure’s tightly bounded scope.
Implementation and Tension with 514
The section acknowledges the 514 framework but explicitly allows a targeted override for the listed entries, clarifying how the reliquidation interacts with existing liquidation timelines and litigation risk.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Trade across all five countries.
Explore Trade in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Monitor Manufacturing Co. (Importer No. 31–162600400) gains a refund of duties on the listed entries and relief from prior misclassification.
- Americana Development Inc. dba Monitor (Importer No. 31–1234748MM) sits within the beneficiary set due to related Monitor import activity.
- Americana Development Inc. dba American Tire & Wheel (Importer No. 31–1234748AW) similarly benefits from the duty refunds tied to these entries.
- American Kenda Importer (Importer No. 31–132072100) is among the named entities linked to identified entries.
- Martin Wheel Importer (Importer No. 31–1234748MW) is part of the broader beneficiary group linked to the reliquidation entries.
Who Bears the Cost
- The U.S. Treasury/CBP bears the cost of issuing the refunds and potential interest, offset by the narrow scope of the relief.
- Other entrants with undisclosed duty histories may look to similar corrections in the future, which could increase administrative workload for CBP.
- Taxpayers indirectly bear the cost if the relief affects overall revenue collections or budgetary planning in the short term.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether a targeted reliquidation remedy should override standard liquidation timelines to instantly correct past duties for a defined set of entries, balancing importer fairness against potential revenue implications and future administrative complexity.
The bill creates a precise, time-limited remedy that hinges on prior CBP rulings and a narrow set of entries. This raises questions about retroactivity, reliance on earlier classifications, and the administrative burden of issuing rapid refunds.
While it improves fairness for specific importers, it also foregrounds trade-offs between honoring established rulings and maintaining predictable revenue flows. Practically, the relief rests on a narrow factual record—the 2009–2010 entry history tied to K389 Hole-N-One tires—and does not generalize beyond those entries, reducing policy drift but inviting scrutiny of how similar misclassifications are handled in the future.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.