This bill amends Title 18 to require any health care practitioner present when an infant is born alive after an abortion or attempted abortion to exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence that would be used for any newborn at the same gestational age, and then immediately transfer and admit the infant to a hospital. It creates a federal enforcement framework: failure to comply is punishable by fines or up to five years’ imprisonment, and intentional killing of a born-alive infant is prosecuted under the Federal murder statute.
The bill also establishes mandatory reporting by practitioners and certain employees, a civil private right of action for the woman on whom the abortion was performed (including treble statutory damages relative to the abortion’s cost, compensatory and punitive damages, and attorney’s fees), a bar to prosecuting the mother, and statutory definitions of “abortion” and “attempt.” It inserts the new criminal section into chapter 74 of Title 18 and renames that chapter "Abortions."
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires clinicians to provide the same standard of care to an infant born alive after an abortion as they would to any newborn at the same gestational age, then immediately admit the infant to a hospital; requires reporting of failures to comply. Establishes criminal penalties (fine or up to 5 years) and treats intentional killing as murder under §1111.
Who It Affects
Physicians, nurses, and other health care practitioners present at abortion procedures; staff of hospitals, physician offices, and abortion clinics who may be mandatory reporters; hospitals that must accept immediate admission and treatment; and women on whom abortions are performed, who gain a federal civil remedy.
Why It Matters
The statute creates a federal medicolegal duty tied to criminal and civil exposure rather than relying solely on state medical malpractice law, potentially changing clinical decision-making, admission and transfer practices, and the liability profile of abortion providers and hospitals.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a new federal crime in Title 18 that centers on what clinicians must do when an abortion or attempted abortion results in an infant born alive. Rather than creating a new medical-licensing rule, it sets a criminal standard: any health care practitioner present at the birth must render the same professional skill, care, and diligence that a reasonably diligent and conscientious practitioner would give to any other child born alive at that gestational age.
After providing that care, the practitioner must ensure immediate transport and admission of the infant to a hospital.
The statute names who must report: any health care practitioner or any employee of a hospital, physician’s office, or abortion clinic who knows of a failure to provide the required care must immediately report the violation to appropriate state or federal law enforcement (or both). Criminal sanctions include fines or imprisonment up to five years for violations of the care-and-admission requirement, and the statute expressly says that intentionally killing a born-alive infant is punishable under the federal murder provision (§1111).Alongside criminal enforcement, the bill creates a federal civil cause of action available to the woman on whom the abortion was performed or attempted.
A prevailing plaintiff can recover objectively verifiable compensatory damages for physical and psychological injuries, punitive damages, statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion or attempted abortion, and a reasonable attorney’s fee. If a defendant prevails and the court finds the suit frivolous, the defendant can recover attorney’s fees.
The bill also includes an explicit bar to prosecuting the mother under this new section or related conspiracy or assistance offenses.Finally, the bill supplies statutory definitions: it defines “abortion” broadly to cover use of instruments, drugs, or devices intended to kill an unborn child or terminate a pregnancy, while carving out procedures intended after viability to produce a live birth and preserve the life and health of the child and procedures to remove a dead unborn child; it defines an “attempt” to perform an abortion as a substantial step toward completing an abortion. The bill makes modest textual changes to chapter headings and inserts the new criminal provision immediately after section 1531 of Title 18.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The statute requires immediate hospital transport and admission of any infant born alive after an abortion, but only after the practitioner first exercises the required degree of professional skill, care, and diligence.
Failure to comply is a federal crime punishable by a fine or imprisonment for up to 5 years; intentionally killing a born‑alive infant is charged under the federal murder statute (§1111).
A health care practitioner or any employee of a hospital, physician’s office, or abortion clinic who has knowledge of a violation must immediately report it to an appropriate State or Federal law enforcement agency, or both.
The woman on whom the abortion was performed may sue; remedies include compensatory damages for physical and psychological injury, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion or attempted abortion, plus attorney’s fees for prevailing plaintiffs.
The statute defines ‘abortion’ to exclude after‑viability procedures intended to produce a live birth and preserve life and health and procedures to remove a dead unborn child, and defines ‘attempt’ as a substantial step toward performing an abortion.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the Act's short title: the "Born‑Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act." This is the label used throughout the statute and in subsequent references; it does not alter substantive obligations but signals congressional intent and frames enforcement and litigation under those terms.
Findings and constitutional authority
Sets out congressional findings that an infant born alive after an abortion is a legal person entitled to protections of federal law, and cites enforcement authority under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment and the Necessary and Proper Clause (including the Commerce Clause). Those citations signal the federal government’s asserted power to criminalize and provide civil remedies for this conduct, which can become a central point in any constitutional challenge but do not themselves change operational duties for clinicians.
Care standard and immediate hospital admission
Creates the operative duty: a practitioner present at a birth that results from an abortion must exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence as would be used for any other child born at the same gestational age, then ensure immediate transport and admission to a hospital. Practically, this ties federal criminal exposure to a medical reasonableness standard – the statute references the conduct of a "reasonably diligent and conscientious" practitioner, but enforcement will be through criminal prosecution rather than state medical boards or malpractice claims.
Criminal penalties and murder provision
Sets the penalty for violating the care-and-admission duty as a fine or up to five years in prison. Separately, it states that anyone who intentionally performs an overt act that kills a born‑alive child is punishable under §1111 for murder or attempted murder. That dual structure creates two tiers of federal criminal exposure: one for omission or failure to provide care and one for intentional killing.
Immunity for the woman receiving the abortion
Specifically immunizes the mother from prosecution under the new section, conspiracy to violate it, and related offenses under sections 3 or 4 of Title 18. That carve‑out limits the statute's reach toward pregnant women themselves but leaves partners, providers, and other actors potentially subject to federal enforcement or civil suit.
Private right of action and damages
Grants the woman on whom the abortion was performed a federal civil cause of action against any person who violated the care-and-admission requirement. The statute authorizes objectively verifiable compensatory damages for physical and psychological injuries, punitive damages, statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion or attempted abortion, and reasonable attorney’s fees for prevailing plaintiffs; courts may award fees to prevailing defendants only when a suit is found frivolous.
Definitions and chapter text changes
Provides statutory definitions of 'abortion' and 'attempt' that frame the scope of criminal and civil liability, and makes clerical changes to insert the new section after §1531 and rename chapter 74 from 'Partial‑Birth Abortions' to 'Abortions.' Those edits are textual but important for how the new offense is indexed and cited in Title 18 and for cross‑references in litigation and enforcement.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Infants born alive after abortions — obtain an explicit federal protection mandating care and hospital admission, which creates a clear legal standard for rescue and treatment.
- Women on whom abortions are performed — gain a federal private right of action that allows recovery for physical and psychological injuries and statutory treble damages tied to the cost of the abortion.
- Neonatal and pediatric hospitals — receive a statutory duty-backed pathway to immediate admission and treatment authority, reducing disputes over whether to accept transfer when an infant is born alive after an abortion.
- State and federal law enforcement agencies and prosecutors — obtain a clear federal statute to investigate and charge failures to provide required care, plus an explicit murder pathway for intentional killing of born‑alive infants.
Who Bears the Cost
- Physicians, nurses, and other practitioners present at abortions — face new criminal exposure for omissions and new mandatory-reporting duties that could alter clinical choices and increase defensive medicine.
- Abortion clinics and their staff — face increased compliance burdens, mandatory-reporting obligations, potential criminal liability for failures to adhere to the care standard, and exposure to civil treble damages and punitive awards.
- Hospitals and emergency departments — must receive immediate admissions when presented with infants born alive and may bear treatment costs, administrative burdens, and potential litigation related to transfer and standard-of-care disputes.
- State public defenders and federal and state prosecutors — may face increased caseloads and resource pressure from both criminal prosecutions and civil enforcement activity arising under the new federal statutes.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is straightforward but consequential: the bill seeks to guarantee lifesaving medical care for infants born alive after abortions by imposing criminal and civil penalties, but it does so by exporting medical‑standard enforcement into the federal criminal and civil system—potentially chilling clinical judgment, creating transfer and admission dilemmas, and provoking jurisdictional conflicts with state medical regulation.
The statute ties criminal liability to a medical standard—"the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence"—but it leaves open how courts and juries will measure that standard in emergency, out‑of‑hospital, or resource‑constrained settings. Prosecutors will need expert testimony to translate clinical decisions into criminal omissions, raising the risk of hindsight-driven prosecutions against practitioners who acted under time pressure or with imperfect information.
The requirement to "ensure" immediate hospital admission after exercising care may also create conflicts when hospitals decline transfers, are at capacity, or are remote: the statute does not specify who is liable if a transfer is arranged but the receiving hospital refuses admission.
Mandatory reporting by any employee of a hospital, physician’s office, or abortion clinic creates an administrative and privacy burden and may deter clinicians from participating in abortions or emergency care out of fear of criminal and civil exposure. The civil remedies—especially statutory damages equal to three times the abortion’s cost—create a potentially powerful financial incentive for suits; while the bill allows fee-shifting for frivolous suits, that protection only operates after litigation.
Finally, the bill is federal overlay legislation that cites the 14th Amendment and the Commerce Clause; it may precipitate conflicts with state medical‑practice regulation, existing state statutes governing fetal or infant protections, and professional licensing regimes, raising preemption and separation‑of‑powers questions likely to be litigated.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.