HB2360 permanently codifies the exemption from the engine-compartment portion of the pre-trip vehicle inspection requirement for certain school bus drivers. The exemption draws from the December 2, 2024 Federal Register notice, including the terms described in section VII.B. paragraphs 2–6 of that notice.
For six years after enactment, the Secretary of Transportation must require participating States to submit annual reports detailing the number of drivers who obtain a CDL under the exemption. The bill does not add new testing requirements beyond codifying the existing exemption and its monitoring framework.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill makes permanent the exemption from the engine-compartment portion of the pre-trip inspection for certain school bus drivers, anchored to the December 2, 2024 Federal Register notice and the terms in VII.B. paragraphs 2–6.
Who It Affects
Participating State transportation departments, school bus operators and districts, and individual school bus drivers who qualify for the exemption; the Secretary of Transportation leads implementation and reporting.
Why It Matters
It provides regulatory certainty for states and operators, while introducing a standardized data-collection mechanism to track how many drivers use the exemption.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill takes a pre-existing federal exemption for the engine-compartment portion of the pre-trip inspection and makes it permanent for a defined group of school bus drivers. It relies on the terms and conditions described in the December 2, 2024 Federal Register notice, effectively codifying that exemption in law.
The text does not alter other parts of the CDL testing regime; it simply preserves this specific allowance under a fixed framework.
A key new feature is a reporting requirement tied to six years after enactment. States that participate in the exemption must annually report to the Secretary of Transportation the number of drivers who obtain a commercial driver's license under the exemption.
This creates a governance mechanism to monitor uptake and provides data to assess how the exemption is functioning in practice. The bill relies on the existing notice for the substantive mechanics of the exemption, while adding a formal federal-recorded policy and a six-year data-reporting cycle.In summary, HB2360 secures a permanent exemption for engine-compartment pre-trip testing for certain school bus drivers and pairs it with a six-year reporting obligation to track its use, without introducing new testing requirements beyond codifying the current exemption framework.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill permanently codifies the engine-compartment pre-trip testing exemption for certain school bus drivers.
It references and incorporates the terms from the December 2, 2024 Federal Register notice (89 Fed. Reg. 95348–95351).
Implementation is nationwide through the Secretary of Transportation, not a floating policy; it becomes permanent.
States participating in the exemption must file annual reports for six years describing how many drivers obtain a CDL under the exemption.
No new testing requirements are added by the bill beyond codifying the existing exemption and the accompanying reporting framework.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Permanent extension of the engine-compartment exemption
Section 1 directs the Secretary of Transportation to make permanent the exemption from the engine-compartment portion of the pre-trip vehicle inspection skills testing requirement for school bus drivers. The exemption is to be implemented as described in the December 2, 2024 Federal Register notice (89 Fed. Reg. 95348), including the terms and conditions set forth in paragraphs 2 through 6 of section VII.B. of that notice. This codification binds current practice into law and provides a stable framework for who qualifies and under what conditions the exemption applies.
Reporting requirement
Subsection (b) requires the Secretary to collect annual reports for six years from participating States describing the number of drivers who obtain a CDL under the exemption. This creates a consistent, transparent data stream to track utilization and to monitor any trends in uptake across states.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- School bus drivers who qualify for the exemption gain access to the CDL pathway under the established exemption while avoiding the engine-compartment testing component.
- State transportation departments that administer the exemption benefit from a codified, uniform policy and a built-in reporting framework to track compliance.
- School districts and bus fleets employing exempt drivers gain policy clarity and potential staffing flexibility under a stable regulatory regime.
- The U.S. Department of Transportation receives standardized data on exemption uptake, supporting oversight and program evaluation.
Who Bears the Cost
- Participating state transportation departments bear the ongoing administrative burden of collecting and submitting annual exemption uptake data for six years.
- CDL testing offices and state agencies incur additional compliance and reporting tasks to ensure accurate data capture and submission.
- State and federal policymakers must allocate resources to monitor, verify, and respond to the annual reports over the six-year period.
- There may be incremental costs associated with ensuring data quality and consistency across states, particularly for smaller districts.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing safety oversight with regulatory relief: the bill preserves an exemption that could affect pre-trip inspection rigor for engine-compartment checks, while mandating data collection to assess safety and workforce impacts.
The bill codifies an exemption that originated in a federal register notice, creating permanence while relying on the underlying terms and conditions described in VII.B. of the notice. The six-year reporting requirement introduces a data-feedback mechanism, but its effectiveness depends on states' capacity to collect and report accurate information.
The bill does not, by itself, establish a safety evaluation framework or set new criteria beyond codifying the existing exemption and its accompanying data collection; implementation risks hinge on how states implement and report under the federal framework.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.