The bill authorizes the White House Task Force on Celebrating America’s 250th Birthday to establish the National Garden of American Heroes, a statuary park to commemorate individuals and groups. It gives the Task Force wide duties for planning, contracting, design, construction, permitting, and environmental reviews, and it provides a funding mechanism and a location process.
A private contributions model and a dedicated National Garden Fund would support development and ongoing maintenance, with Congress kept informed through regular reports.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Task Force shall establish the Garden, manage planning, contracts, design, construction, permitting, and related reviews. The Garden can be located in the Reserve and funded from private contributions and a dedicated fund.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies (Interior, NPS), state/local governments that may donate land, tribal governments, private donors, and prospective visitors.
Why It Matters
It creates a permanent national monument project tied to the 250th birthday celebration, with a defined funding stream and a public access timeline.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill directs the White House Task Force to create a new National Garden of American Heroes—a statuary park aimed at honoring individuals or groups. It places the Task Force in charge of all aspects of building the Garden, from site selection and land acquisition to design and environmental reviews, and it sets a hard target to begin construction by July 4, 2026, contingent on Interior Secretary approval of the site.
Location options include the Reserve, and if necessary, the Interior Secretary may acquire land from states, localities, tribes, or private landowners. The Garden may be funded with private contributions and a National Garden Fund housed in the Treasury; the Fund can receive contributions, accrue interest, and be invested in U.S. government obligations.
Funds are available to Interior for administrative support, to the Task Force for construction, and to the National Park Service for ongoing maintenance after opening. A visitation fee may be charged if needed, with fees used solely for maintenance.
The Task Force must report to Congress every 60 days on location, design plans, timeline, and budget until the Garden opens, and the Director of the NPS must report on maintenance and operations thereafter. Definitions clarify who qualifies as the Garden, the Reserve, and other key terms.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates the National Garden Fund in the Treasury to hold private contributions and investment income.
Construction must begin by July 4, 2026, subject to Interior location approval.
The Garden may be placed in the National Reserve, with land acquisition possible from states, local governments, Tribes, or private owners.
The Task Force has broad authority to plan, design, and implement the Garden, with funding from private contributions and the Fund.
A visitation fee may be charged later, with proceeds devoted to maintenance and ongoing operation.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishment and Task Force responsibilities
The White House Task Force on Celebrating America’s 250th Birthday is tasked with establishing the Garden and managing all aspects of its planning, contracting, design, construction, permitting, compliance, and related environmental reviews. This section assigns the core governance and execution duties to the Task Force and sets the foundation for subsequent timelines and funding mechanisms.
Timeline for construction
The Task Force must commence construction by July 4, 2026 to the maximum extent practicable. Construction may not begin without Interior Secretary approval of the Garden’s location, ensuring federal land-use and site suitability considerations are met before breaking ground.
Location and land acquisition
The Garden may be established in the National Reserve, and if not on Federal land, the Interior Secretary may acquire land from States, local governments, Tribal Governments, or private landowners through purchase, donation, or exchange. This provision creates a flexible but federally supervised path to secure a suitable site while acknowledging land-use constraints.
Individual and group honorees
The Garden may commemorate any individual or group, allowing for a broad spectrum of heroes to be memorialized. This broad scope facilitates a flexible curation approach that can adapt to evolving public memory and national narratives.
Private contributions
The Task Force is authorized to solicit and accept private contributions for the Garden. This funding stream is intended to supplement federal support and accelerate development while ensuring private philanthropy plays a defined, compliant role in project financing.
Fund structure and investments
There is established in the Treasury a National Garden Fund to hold contributions, plus interest and proceeds from investments of the Fund. The Chair of the Task Force determines investment strategy, prioritizing U.S. government obligations. The Fund’s deposits, interest, and investment proceeds support the Garden’s establishment and ongoing maintenance.
Use of fund proceeds
Funds from the National Garden Fund are available as needed to the Secretary of the Interior for administrative support, to the Task Force for establishing the Garden, and to the NPS Director from the Garden’s opening forward for maintenance. This creates a centralized, non-appropriated funding stream for core operations.
Visitation fees
The Director may charge a visitation fee if funds in the National Garden Fund are insufficient for maintenance. Fees collected must be used exclusively for maintenance purposes, ensuring a dedicated revenue source for ongoing operations.
Reporting to Congress
The Task Force must provide a detailed report on location, design plans, construction timeline (including a public opening date), and budget within 60 days of enactment and every 60 days thereafter until opening. After opening, the Director must provide regular maintenance and operations reports detailing staffing, conservation, visitation, safety, security, and fund usage.
Definitions
Key terms include the ‘Appropriate Congressional Committees’ (House Natural Resources and Senate Energy and Natural Resources), ‘Garden’ (the National Garden of American Heroes per cited Executive Orders), ‘Reserve,’ ‘State,’ ‘Task Force,’ and ‘Tribal Government.’ This section anchors the bill’s scope and legal interpretation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Culture across all five countries.
Explore Culture in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- National Park Service (NPS) operational and maintenance role gains a new, high-visibility project to manage and care for after opening.
- U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) administrative capabilities gain a defined program with a dedicated funding mechanism and site control.
- Private donors and philanthropic organizations gain a formal, transparent channel for contributing to a national monument.
- State and local governments that donate or sell land gain a sanctioned pathway for site availability and potential public benefit.
- Tribal Governments participate in land transactions or site designation with federal alignment.
- The visiting public benefits from a newly created national monument that preserves historical memory and offers public access.
Who Bears the Cost
- Funding and administration responsibilities fall on the National Garden Fund and the Treasury, absorbing costs that would otherwise come from annual appropriations.
- DoI and NPS incur ongoing maintenance and security costs once the Garden opens.
- State/local governments may incur costs related to land donations or conveyances and any required environmental reviews.
- The Task Force bears project planning and contracting costs during development.
- Private landowners or tribal governments providing land may incur transaction-related costs or foregone development opportunities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between rapid establishment and robust federal oversight: private funding and a spectacle-like memorial could accelerate creation, but may compromise transparency, equitable access, and site suitability if not properly governed and audited.
The bill creates a novel funding structure that relies on private donations and a dedicated fund instead of traditional annual appropriations. This can introduce budgetary transparency challenges and governance questions about how funds are managed, invested, and monitored.
The mandated timeline—while explicit—depends on interior site approvals and potential land acquisitions that could prove contentious at the local level, especially if land is already used for other purposes. Location choices in the Reserve or other land parcels raise questions about environmental reviews, public access, and long-term stewardship.
Private contributions could influence commemorative choices, so governance mechanisms should guard against perceptions of donor-driven curation. The bill also contemplates a visitation fee that, while optional, creates a revenue stream with potential accessibility implications if fees become a barrier for some visitors.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.