HB2452 would require that locker rooms in active use for education programs or activities be used only by individuals whose sex is determined at birth by reproductive biology and genetics. The prohibition applies to any use of a locker room by someone of the opposite sex when the room is actively in use by individuals of the other sex.
The act would take effect 30 days after enactment. The bill creates a clear, time-bound standard for how educational institutions enforce locker-room access based on birth biology, with enforcement tied to Title IX compliance.
At a Glance
What It Does
For Title IX compliance, locker rooms in active use must be restricted to individuals of the same sex as birth-determined by reproductive biology and genetics. The ban applies when the room is in active use in connection with an educational program or activity.
Who It Affects
Educational institutions subject to Title IX—K-12 school districts, colleges, and universities—plus students and staff relying on locker-room facilities during education programs or activities.
Why It Matters
It establishes a uniform, birth-sex-based standard for locker-room access, clarifying compliance expectations under Title IX and potentially affecting privacy, safety, and inclusion dynamics in school facilities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill creates a single, birth-sex-based rule for locker-room access in any education program or activity covered by Title IX. It stipulates that locker rooms in active use may be used only by individuals whose sex is determined at birth by reproductive biology and genetics.
In practical terms, this means schools, colleges, and universities would restrict locker-room access to people who were assigned a sex at birth, and would bar individuals of the opposite sex from using those facilities when they are actively in use. The rule applies to all such facilities across educational programs and activities that fall under Title IX.
The act includes a straightforward enforcement mechanism by tying compliance to Title IX, with an effective date 30 days after enactment. There are no listed exemptions in the text, and the provision would impact any educational program or activity that relies on shared locker-room facilities.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires locker rooms in active use to be limited to individuals whose sex is determined at birth by reproductive biology and genetics.
It prohibits use of a locker room by a person of the opposite sex when the room is in active use by the other sex in connection with an education program or activity.
The definition of sex is based solely on birth biology/genetics, with no reference to gender identity in determining eligibility.
The act takes effect 30 days after enactment.
It applies to all educational programs or activities subject to Title IX in the United States.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section designates the act as the Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025. It establishes the formal nomenclature for citation and reference in any relevant administrative or legal processes.
Prohibition on locker-room use
This section prohibits, under Title IX, an individual of one sex from using a locker room while the room is in active use by individuals of the opposite sex, with the sex determined at birth by reproductive biology and genetics. It creates a straightforward, enforceable standard for who may access locker-room facilities when they are actively in use in connection with an education program or activity.
Effective date
This section provides that the Act takes effect 30 days after the date of enactment. It places a concrete, short lead time on institutions to implement the standard for locker-room access in education programs and activities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Female students in K-12 and higher education, who may gain enhanced privacy and a sense of safety in locker-room settings when access is restricted to birth-sex determinations during active use.
- Parents of female students who prioritize privacy and safety in school facilities.
- Title IX coordinators and compliance officers in educational institutions seeking a clear, centralized standard for locker-room access.
- School districts, colleges, and universities that prefer a uniform, legally straightforward policy to assess compliance under Title IX.
Who Bears the Cost
- Educational institutions subject to Title IX, which may incur costs to adjust policies, signage, monitoring, and training to ensure compliance with the birth-sex locker-room standard.
- Facilities and operations staff responsible for implementing access controls and potential facility renovations or reconfigurations to align with the policy.
- Title IX offices and compliance personnel who will need to administer enforcement, respond to disputes, and conduct related training.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between privacy and safety expectations for students in single-sex locker rooms and the legal principle of non-discrimination for transgender and intersex individuals. The bill resolves this by anchoring sex to birth biology, but that decision creates potential conflicts with evolving understandings of sex and gender and with rights claims that emphasize gender identity.
The bill creates a clear, binary standard for locker-room access tied to birth biology and genetics. While it provides a simple rule, it raises several policy and implementation questions.
The lack of defined exemptions or accommodations for intersex individuals or others with atypical development could create disputes at the classroom and campus level. The text does not address other facilities (such as bathrooms or private changing spaces) or cross-facility consistency, which means schools may face inconsistent application across different contexts.
Finally, the measure could interact with broader nondiscrimination frameworks and transgender rights considerations in ways that surface in litigation or administrative proceedings, even though the bill itself does not provide a path for exceptions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.