The Heating and Cooling Relief Act amends the Low‑Income Home Energy Assistance Act to substantially increase federal funding flexibility for heating and cooling aid, make cooling a central program objective, expand eligibility, and attach operational conditions to state and utility partners. It changes program name references to the Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP), raises the weatherization set‑aside, creates a three‑year “just transition” grant stream, and requires new data collection on arrears and shutoffs.
For practitioners: the bill shifts LIHEAP from a largely seasonal, block‑grant framework toward a year‑round, entitlement‑style posture by authorizing “such sums as may be necessary,” setting a $2 billion baseline allotment for FY2026 (with similar minimums thereafter), and adding new state requirements for outreach, auto‑enrollment, supplier behavior, and electrification‑focused repairs. Utilities, state HEAP offices, weatherization contractors, and low‑income households will see concrete operational and compliance changes — and federal agencies will get new reporting and technical assistance duties that could reshape local program design.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill removes a hard cap on LIHEAP appropriations and establishes a $2 billion baseline for fiscal year 2026 (plus such additional sums as necessary thereafter), authorizes $1 billion per year for three‑year just‑transition grants, raises the weatherization set‑aside to 25 percent, and broadens eligible cooling support and emergency disaster assistance (including extreme heat and cold). It also requires states to adopt eligibility‑simplification measures, aim at reducing energy burdens to roughly 3 percent of income, and bind home energy suppliers to specific behaviors (no late fees in a defined window, refunds, and a 2‑year no‑shutoff period after assistance).
Who It Affects
Directly affects state HEAP agencies and local coordinating entities that administer benefits, utilities and municipal energy suppliers (required to share data and change billing practices to participate), weatherization and retrofit contractors (new funding and electrification priorities), and low‑ and moderate‑income households — particularly those with high energy burdens, families with children, and medically vulnerable households using electricity‑dependent medical equipment.
Why It Matters
The bill reframes federal low‑income energy assistance from stopgap seasonal help to a more comprehensive affordability and resilience program that explicitly connects relief to decarbonization and cooling access. It conditions federal funding on program design and supplier cooperation, creates a standardized arrears reporting template, and funds a multi‑year pilot to accelerate electrification in low‑income housing — changes that will alter cash flows, compliance priorities, and program partnerships at state and local levels.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill fundamentally recasts the Low‑Income Home Energy Assistance Program by removing a strict dollar cap and instructing Congress to appropriate “such sums as may be necessary,” while also setting a concrete fiscal‑year baseline and a separate authorization for a new just‑transition grant line. That structure is designed to let states assist all income‑eligible households while directing predictable funds toward both immediate bill relief and longer‑term home upgrades.
On eligibility and enrollment, the bill widens the income doorway: households that earn up to the greater of 250 percent of the federal poverty level or 80 percent of a State’s median income are explicitly within the program’s scope. It bars states from excluding households on the basis of household members’ citizenship and directs states to use data‑sharing with other means‑tested programs, simplified re‑enrollment, and self‑attestation where necessary to minimize paperwork barriers.
The Secretary must also require states to design action plans for extreme heat and to review eligibility to capture additional vulnerable groups (for example, pregnant people or those with heat‑sensitive medical conditions).Operationally, the bill ties federal support to concrete state and supplier behaviors. States getting funds must demonstrate outreach, online application capability (required within five years), HEAP coordinator training and a wage floor for coordinators, and auto‑enrollment efforts.
The bill requires partnering home energy suppliers to share arrear and nonpayment data, include program enrollment information on delinquency notices, forgo late fees around the assistance period (six months before to six months after receipt) with quick refunds if fees were charged, and refrain from disconnecting service of households that received assistance for two years after the payment. It also bans supplier cost‑recovery via rate increases for arrearage assistance as part of the guidance on paying arrears.To move beyond bill assistance, the bill raises the weatherization set‑aside to 25 percent, directs a significant portion to energy‑related home repair that reduces fossil‑fuel dependence, encourages electrification (heat pumps), and pushes for community solar access or distributed renewables for eligible households.
The Secretaries must issue a template for arrears reporting (defining arrears as a 60–90 day unpaid bill where states decide specifics), run a study on shutoffs and late fees, offer grants to build state tracking systems, and jointly run a three‑year Just Transition grant program that prioritizes high energy‑use eligible households and local workforce partnerships. Finally, the law renames program references to “Home Energy Assistance Program” and makes conforming edits elsewhere in the statute.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill removes a hard LIHEAP appropriation cap and requires Congress to fund “such sums as may be necessary,” while establishing a $2,000,000,000 baseline for fiscal year 2026 and a minimum $2,000,000,000 plus additional sums each year thereafter for regular allotments.
It authorizes $1,000,000,000 per year (plus necessary additional sums) to carry out section 2607C — a three‑year HEAP Just Transition grant program for state and local retrofit and decarbonization plans.
The bill expands eligibility to households with incomes at or below the greater of 250 percent of the federal poverty level or 80 percent of State median income, requires states to prioritize lowest‑income households, and prohibits excluding applicants based on household members’ citizenship status.
States must, as a condition of funding, require partner home energy suppliers to stop charging late fees for payments made in the window beginning six months before and ending six months after a household receives assistance, refund any such fees within seven days of receiving HEAP funds for the household, and refrain from shutting off energy service to that household for two years after assistance.
The weatherization set‑aside rises from 15 percent to 25 percent of program funds, and states must direct a substantial portion toward energy‑related home repairs that reduce fossil‑fuel dependence, prioritize appliance electrification (heat pumps), and expand access to community solar or distributed renewables for eligible households.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Removes the hard cap, sets baseline allotments, and authorizes just‑transition grants
This section edits the LIHEAP funding language to replace the prior fixed statutory cap with open‑ended language — “such sums as may be necessary” — and explicitly sets a $2 billion floor for FY2026 with the same minimum plus any additional sums thereafter. It also creates a separate authorization to appropriate $1 billion for a new section 2607C (Just Transition grants) and permits emergency allotments tied to declared disasters, including extreme heat or cold. Practically, this gives states more predictable minimum funding while keeping room for supplemental appropriations after major disasters; it also creates an explicit federal pot for multi‑year retrofit planning and decarbonization projects.
Adds operational definitions and clarifies who administers the program locally
The bill inserts defined terms for ‘extreme heat/cold,’ ‘HEAP coordinator,’ ‘local coordinating agency,’ and ‘State agency.’ Those definitions matter because later compliance requirements (wage floors, training, data sharing, and simplified re‑enrollment) are tied to HEAP coordinators and local coordinating agencies. Defining ‘extreme heat’ and ‘extreme cold’ also expands the program’s disaster authority to non‑traditional emergency events driven by climate change, enabling allotments and emergency assistance tied to heat events rather than only to storms or FEMA declarations.
Authorizes disaster and extreme‑temperature allotments and limits re‑eligibility barriers
This amendment lets the Secretary and FEMA provide HEAP allotments after a presidential or statutory disaster declaration and explicitly recognizes extreme heat/cold as qualifying triggers. It requires states to assure that households receiving emergency heating or cooling assistance are not blocked from receiving further assistance in the same calendar year, and it forbids states from conditioning emergency help on a medical‑need attestation. It also instructs states to use emergency funds for cooling equipment and other immediate measures as appropriate, which expands the program’s operational toolkit during climate‑related events.
Raises income eligibility, mandates simplification, and ties funding to outreach and supplier agreements
The bill broadens eligibility to the greater of 250 percent FPL or 80 percent State median income and requires states to prioritize those with the lowest incomes while prohibiting citizenship‑based exclusions. It compels states to implement data‑sharing, simplified re‑enrollment, and allow self‑attestation where necessary to reduce barriers. Separately, as a funding condition, states must plan to expand HEAP year‑round, create online application capabilities within five years, set HEAP coordinator wages at a not‑less‑than $15/hour floor, run outreach (including through schools), and document barriers to auto‑enrollment. These operational conditions increase program access but impose new administrative requirements on states and local partners.
Bumps up weatherization funding and prioritizes electrification and community solar access
The bill increases the weatherization set‑aside from 15 percent to 25 percent of program funds and requires states to use a sizable portion to perform energy‑related home repairs that reduce fossil‑fuel dependence. It expressly prioritizes replacing fossil‑fuel appliances with electric technologies (for example, heat pumps), mandates electrical panel and wiring upgrades when needed, and encourages use of funds to expand participation in community solar or distributed renewables for eligible households. This provision links short‑term relief to longer‑term decarbonization and raises practical implementation questions about workforce capacity and supply chains.
Standardized arrears reporting template and guidance banning supplier cost recovery
The bill directs DOE and HHS to develop a standardized template for tracking eligible households in arrears (proposing a 60–90 day unpaid threshold as a definitional starting point) and to issue guidance on paying arrears at the point of assistance. It authorizes grants to states to build tracking systems and explicitly prohibits home energy suppliers from seeking to recover arrearage assistance costs through rate increases or other customer charges. It also requires a Secretary‑led study of shutoffs and late‑fee patterns and guidance for supplier‑state coordination on arrears — measures intended to produce consistent national data and stop supplier cost‑shifting onto low‑income customers.
Rebrands LIHEAP as HEAP and creates a three‑year Just Transition grant program
The bill replaces references to the Low‑Income Home Energy Assistance Program with Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP) across the statute. It adds section 2607C to establish three‑year Just Transition grants administered jointly by HHS and DOE, prioritizing interagency retrofit plans for eligible households with high energy use, local workforce partnerships, and projects that reduce energy burdens while advancing decarbonization. Recipients must evaluate outcomes and report to Congress at the program’s close, setting up a testbed for federal support of equitable electrification.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.
Explore Energy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Low‑ and moderate‑income households with high energy burdens — Expanded eligibility, year‑round funding, increased cooling assistance, arrearage relief, and protections against immediate shutoffs reduce near‑term exposure to unaffordable bills and extreme‑temperature harms.
- Households with electricity‑dependent medical needs — The bill requires outreach and guidance targeted to medically vulnerable individuals and prioritizes access to reliable cooling and bill assistance for people using ventilators or oxygen concentrators.
- Weatherization and retrofit contractors, unions, and MWBEs — The Just Transition grants and higher weatherization set‑aside create new contracting opportunities and place an explicit preference on workforce partnerships, which can drive demand for local installers and skilled labor.
- State HEAP offices and community partners — Additional funds, technical assistance, and grants for data systems can expand administrative capacity, enable online enrollment, and finance outreach, improving program reach and throughput.
- Public‑housing residents and voucher holders — The bill charges federal agencies to identify safe residential temperature standards and to consider using covered utility allowances for cooling assistance, which may improve living conditions in federally assisted housing.
Who Bears the Cost
- Home energy suppliers and utilities — To participate in HEAP funding they must change billing practices (no late fees in a defined window, refunds within seven days), share nonpayment data with states, and accept restrictions on recovering arrearage assistance through rates, which could shift financial and regulatory burdens to utilities and rate proceedings.
- State and local administering agencies — States must develop online systems, update action plans, raise HEAP coordinator wages to a statutory floor, run outreach, and implement auto‑enrollment — all administrative costs that require planning and, for many states, additional IT and staff investment.
- Federal appropriators and taxpayers — The bill’s open‑ended “such sums as may be necessary” language plus new multi‑year grant authorizations creates potential upward pressure on federal spending for energy assistance and retrofits.
- Small municipal utilities and rural co‑ops — Required outreach, data sharing, and partnership duties may impose operational burdens on small, publicly owned suppliers lacking large billing and compliance staffs.
- Landlords and housing authorities — The push for retrofits, panel upgrades, and compliance with temperature standards could impose capital upgrade responsibilities on property owners, especially in older multifamily buildings.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma: the bill seeks to solve immediate energy poverty through expanded, year‑round cash and arrearage relief while simultaneously using the same program to accelerate electrification and climate resilience. Rapidly scaling both relief and retrofit work protects households now but increases administrative complexity, requires new workforce and capital investments, and forces a choice between speed of distribution (minimizing paperwork and maximizing enrollment) and careful targeting and oversight (ensuring funds advance decarbonization without shifting costs to other ratepayers). There is no simple policy setting that achieves all three cleanly.
The bill packs relief and long‑term decarbonization into one statutory package, but that blend creates implementation and trade‑off complexity. First, the funding language combines an open‑ended “such sums as may be necessary” posture with a set baseline; that gives states flexibility but raises questions about federal oversight and accountability for year‑round appropriations and disaster supplements.
Absent explicit formula or prioritization rules for additional sums, states with greater administrative capacity or better political connections could capture disproportionate increases.
Second, the supplier‑centric compliance rules (data sharing, no‑fee windows, refund timing, and a two‑year no‑shutoff promise) protect households but intersect awkwardly with utility regulation. Utilities that cannot recover costs in rate cases may push for alternative cost allocations or reduce participation in voluntary partnerships.
State utility commissions and municipal suppliers will need to reconcile consumer‑protection conditions with obligations to nonparticipating customers and grid reliability, particularly if arrearage relief is large and rapid.
Finally, the bill’s electrification and weatherization ambitions expose practical supply‑side constraints: qualified crews, materials, permitting for panel upgrades, and equitable access to community solar are limited in many regions. Auto‑enrollment, data‑sharing, and IT modernization mandates will strain smaller HEAP offices and cooperative utilities absent targeted implementation grants, and the bill leaves several design choices (how to define extreme heat locally, how to phase panel upgrades, criteria for community solar eligibility) to the agencies and states — creating administrative discretion that will determine outcomes on equity and speed of delivery.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.