The Abortion Care Awareness Act adds a new provision to the Public Health Service Act directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to carry out a national public health education, awareness, and outreach campaign aimed at improving access to abortion and associated services. The campaign must cover where and how to obtain abortion care (including medication abortion), telehealth options, travel rights across state lines, how to spot misleading information from anti‑abortion centers, and how to protect personal health information.
The statute requires HHS to post the campaign materials on its website, tailor outreach to a list of underserved populations, and consult with clinical experts, reproductive‑rights nonprofits, state and local health departments, and higher‑education institutions. It also bars the campaign from collecting or retaining personal data on site visitors and forbids promotion of known misinformation topics such as "abortion reversal." For compliance officers and program leads, the bill creates an operational mandate for HHS to build an evidence‑based, privacy‑preserving national communications program focused on abortion access.
At a Glance
What It Does
Directs HHS to run a national education and outreach campaign about abortion access and related services, requiring content on topics from medication abortion to travel assistance and misinformation identification. The content must be available on the HHS website and tailored for specified underserved groups.
Who It Affects
HHS as the implementing agency, reproductive‑health providers and telehealth services who may be referenced or linked, nonprofits that assist with travel or patient navigation, and populations seeking abortion care—particularly people in underserved communities or restrictive states.
Why It Matters
This creates a federal operational program focused on information and navigation rather than funding clinical services, sets privacy and misinformation guardrails for outreach, and formalizes federal consultation with clinical and advocacy stakeholders—potentially shaping national messaging on medication abortion and telehealth.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a single new section into the Public Health Service Act that tasks the Secretary of Health and Human Services with implementing a coordinated, national public education and outreach campaign to improve access to abortion and related health care. HHS must design materials that explain where and how to obtain abortion care, including instructions about medication abortion and telehealth options, and provide practical guidance on travel for care and organizations that offer support.
The campaign is expressly an information and awareness effort — it does not create new clinical programs or payment authorities for services.
The statute enumerates the topics the campaign must cover: how to find in‑person and telehealth services, the legal landscape for prescribing and receiving abortion care consistent with applicable state and federal law, medically accurate descriptions of procedures and medications, how to spot deceptive claims from crisis pregnancy centers, how to recognize disinformation aimed at discouraging care, and steps to protect sensitive health data. Materials must be accessible on HHS’s website and designed to be culturally competent and accessible for named underserved populations, including people living on Tribal lands and those with limited English proficiency.The bill limits what HHS may do in delivering the campaign: it prohibits promoting demonstrably false claims about abortion safety, endorsing ‘‘abortion reversal’’ claims, advancing abstinence‑only curricula, or collecting and retaining personal information about visitors to campaign digital resources.
To develop content, HHS must consult clinical experts in sexual and reproductive health, reproductive‑rights and justice nonprofits, state and local public health departments, and nonprofit higher‑education institutions. Finally, the bill defines ‘‘abortion and related health services’’ and sets a high bar for ‘‘medically accurate and complete information’’ by anchoring that standard to peer‑reviewed research and mainstream medical organizations.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds section 399V–8 to the Public Health Service Act, creating a statutory requirement for a national abortion access education campaign run by HHS.
It requires HHS to publish campaign materials on the Department’s website and to ensure content is tailored for specific underserved groups (e.g.
people with limited English, Tribal communities, rural residents).
The campaign is prohibited from collecting, retaining, using, or disclosing personal information about visitors to any campaign website, app, or resource.
HHS must consult with named categories of stakeholders — clinical experts in reproductive health, reproductive‑rights nonprofits (including funds for abortion access), state and local public health departments, and nonprofit colleges — when developing materials.
The statute defines “medically accurate and complete information” by reference to research using accepted scientific methods and recognition by mainstream professional medical organizations (AMA, ACOG, etc.).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the act as the "Abortion Care Awareness Act of 2025." This is a standard naming clause and has no operational effect, but it frames the bill’s purpose for implementing guidance and interagency memoranda.
HHS to carry out national campaign
Creates an affirmative duty for the Secretary to implement a coordinated, focused national public health education, awareness, and outreach campaign specifically aimed at enhancing access to abortion and services provided alongside abortion. Practically, this imposes on HHS the program design, staffing, contracting, and oversight tasks necessary to move from intent language to a functioning communications operation.
Required topics and accessibility standards
Specifies the content the campaign must include: how to access abortion (including medication abortion) by in‑person and telehealth routes; legal information about prescribing and receiving care consistent with state and federal law; medically accurate information on abortion and related services; patient travel rights and available supports; how to identify crisis pregnancy centers and misinformation; and guidance on protecting personal health data. It also instructs HHS to host materials on its website and to design outreach for enumerated underserved communities, which will shape audience segmentation, language services, and distribution strategies.
Prohibitions on content and data practices
Places substantive limits on campaign activities: HHS may not promote known falsehoods about abortion safety, promote ‘‘abortion reversal’’ claims, advance abstinence‑only or non‑comprehensive sexual‑education programming, or collect or retain personal data about visitors to campaign resources. These constraints affect choices about analytics, advertising, user feedback tools, and third‑party platform use; complying may require privacy‑first technical architectures and restrictions on performance tracking.
Consultation requirements
Requires HHS to consult a defined set of stakeholders — clinical experts in sexual and reproductive health and abortion, reproductive‑rights and access organizations (including funds that help pay for abortion), state and local public health departments, and nonprofit institutions of higher education — during campaign design and rollout. That creates channels for clinical guidance, community input, and partnership for dissemination, but it does not mandate formal interagency or grant relationships.
Definitions for covered terms and accuracy standard
Provides statutory definitions for key terms: 'abortion and related health services' and 'medically accurate and complete information.' The latter ties accuracy to peer‑reviewed research when available and to endorsement by mainstream professional bodies (e.g., AMA, ACOG), which will be the benchmark for content decisions and disputes about what constitutes reliable medical information.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- People seeking abortion care, especially in restrictive or low‑access states: they gain a centralized federal source of information on where to obtain services, telehealth options, travel resources, and how to detect misleading counseling centers.
- Underserved populations called out in the statute (people with limited English, Tribal communities, rural residents, low‑income people, people with disabilities, LGBTQI+ individuals): the bill forces tailored outreach and accessibility accommodations that increase the likelihood targeted materials and navigation supports will exist.
- Reproductive‑health nonprofits and patient navigation funds: inclusion in consultation and the campaign’s focus on travel and financial support can expand referral networks and visibility for organizations that help patients access out‑of‑state care or cover costs.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Health and Human Services: must allocate funding, staff, contractors, and privacy protections to build, run, and evaluate the campaign; compliance with the data‑collection ban may increase technical costs for privacy‑preserving analytics.
- Contractors and content vendors: required to adhere to strict accuracy, cultural competence, and non‑collection rules, potentially increasing production complexity and cost (multilingual materials, accessible formats, Tribal consultation).
- Telehealth providers and clinics referenced in outreach: greater public visibility could increase demand and operational strain without accompanying funding; providers in restrictive jurisdictions may face legal risk in cross‑state contexts that the campaign must navigate carefully.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits two legitimate goals against one another: maximizing clear, actionable federal information to expand access to abortion care, and avoiding any federal activity that could be construed as facilitating conduct that some states restrict or as violating patient privacy; resolving that tension forces choices about how specific guidance can be while remaining legally defensible and privacy‑preserving.
The bill advances a federal information program in an area where state laws are highly fragmented and sometimes criminalize aspects of abortion care. HHS must craft content about "where and how to access" services while repeatedly circumscribing that guidance to actions "consistent with applicable State and Federal laws." That balance is operationally awkward: navigation materials that are too specific about out‑of‑state providers or telehealth workflows could be challenged by states as facilitating unlawful conduct, while vaguer guidance risks being useless to people trying to reach care.
The statute’s blanket prohibition on collecting or retaining personal information about visitors to campaign websites is privacy‑protective but practically limiting. HHS will need to decide whether anonymous, privacy‑preserving metrics are sufficient to evaluate reach and effectiveness, or whether the ban will constrain iterative improvement and partner referrals.
Additionally, the definition of "medically accurate and complete information" ties accuracy to mainstream professional bodies, which lowers the risk of controversial claims but may slow adoption of emergent evidence or non‑traditional care models. Finally, ensuring meaningful cultural competence across the many populations named — and doing so without additional funding appropriated in the text — is a practical and ethical challenge: high‑quality, multilingual, disability‑accessible materials and Tribal consultation require resources and time that the statute mandates but does not explicitly fund.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.