The Delete DOGE Act defines a set of "covered" executive orders, organizations, and people tied to the President’s so‑called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and denies federal funds to those entities and individuals. It prohibits using federal money to implement, administer, or enforce the listed executive orders, rescinds federal support for DOGE entities, and prevents covered individuals from using federal resources or issuing government‑colored directives.
The statute also carves out an unusual limited treatment of the United States Digital Service (USDS): USDS funding is confined to the scope of work it performed as of January 19, 2025, and may not support projects initiated by a covered entity on or after January 20, 2025. For compliance officers, contracting officers, and agency leaders this bill creates immediate screening obligations, potential contract and project stops, and legal ambiguities about pre‑existing obligations and successor entities.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill defines "covered" executive orders, entities, and individuals tied to DOGE and bars federal funds from implementing those EOs, from going to covered entities, and from being used by covered individuals. It also restricts the United States Digital Service to the scope of activities it performed on January 19, 2025 and forbids USDS participation in projects initiated by a covered entity after January 20, 2025.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies that would have relied on DOGE guidance or projects, the United States Digital Service, contractors and vendors that planned to work with DOGE, and any individuals (employees, contractors, volunteers, consultants) associated with DOGE on or after January 20, 2025.
Why It Matters
The bill deploys appropriations language to nullify a cluster of executive actions and to sever funding ties to a newly created executive entity; that shifts the locus of control over cross‑agency tech and efficiency projects from an executive office back to agencies and Congress, and it creates immediate compliance and procurement implications.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill draws a wide net. It labels certain executive orders (including three identified EOs and any successors) as "covered" and then uses funding restrictions to block their implementation.
It likewise defines a group of organizations—the United States DOGE Service, a temporary DOGE organization, DOGE Teams created by covered orders, entities set up to implement those orders, and any successors—as covered entities. Finally, it treats as "covered individuals" anyone associated with those entities on or after January 20, 2025, and anyone who at any point headed or controlled such an entity.
Once an entity, order, or person is within those definitions, the bill imposes a simple but blunt rule: federal funds may not be used to implement, administer, or enforce a covered executive order, and—except for a narrow USDS carve‑out—federal funds may not be obligated, expended, transferred, or otherwise made available to covered entities. For USDS the bill preserves funding only to the extent USDS continues the same digital service delivery work it was performing on January 19, 2025, and explicitly bars USDS from participating in any project that was initiated by a covered entity on or after January 20, 2025.The legislation also targets people: covered individuals cannot use federal funds (including access to equipment or federally funded devices), and agencies cannot implement, administer, or enforce any directive or recommendation made under the color of government by a covered individual.
That provision reaches beyond formal employees to contractors, consultants, volunteers, and even people who formerly headed or controlled a covered entity.Operationally, agencies would need to screen projects, contracts, personnel assignments, and equipment use against the bill’s definitions and dates. Contracts tied to initiatives that a covered entity initiated on or after January 20, 2025 could lose federal funding, and agencies must be prepared to justify continued funding under the limited USDS carve‑out or to wind down support.
The bill leaves a range of practical questions about already‑committed funds, procurement remedies, and how to identify successors or projects "initiated by" covered entities—issues that will fall to agency general counsels and appropriations staff to resolve.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill defines "covered entity" to include the United States DOGE Service, a DOGE Service Temporary Organization, DOGE Teams created by covered executive orders, entities formed to implement those orders, and any successors.
It forbids the use of federal funds to implement, administer, or enforce any listed "covered executive order" (including Executive Orders 14158, 14210, and 14222 and their successors).
It restricts United States Digital Service funding to the scope of work it performed on January 19, 2025 and bars USDS from engaging in any project initiated by a covered entity on or after January 20, 2025.
Except for the narrow USDS limitation, the bill prohibits obligating, expending, transferring, or otherwise making federal funds available to any covered entity.
The bill bars covered individuals—from officers and employees to contractors, consultants, and volunteers— from using federal funds (including federally purchased equipment) and prevents agencies from carrying out directives or recommendations issued by such individuals under the color of government.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
States the Act’s short name: the "Delete DOGE Act." This has no operative effect beyond identifying the measure but signals the statute’s focus on eliminating DOGE‑related federal funding.
Definitions: covered entity, executive order, and individual
Sets the statute’s scope by defining three core concepts. "Covered entity" reaches the named United States DOGE Service, temporary DOGE organization, DOGE Teams created by covered orders, any entity established to implement covered orders, and successors. "Covered executive order" lists three EOs by number and includes successor orders; that list is the bill’s operative trigger for funding prohibitions. "Covered individual" is deliberately broad—covering officers, employees, experts, consultants, contractors, volunteers, and anyone who has at any point headed or controlled a covered entity—so the definitions sweep in current staff and many affiliated non‑employees. These choices determine what programs, people, and documents agencies must screen against when applying the funding restrictions.
Prohibition on using federal funds to implement covered executive orders
Directs that no federal funds may be used to implement, administer, or enforce any covered executive order. Practically, that prohibits agencies from executing programs or directives that flow from the listed orders using federal appropriations. The provision operates as an express funding bar rather than a direct injunction against issuing orders; its real force is in preventing the financial support necessary to carry out covered orders.
Special rule for United States Digital Service funding
Creates a narrow exception for USDS: Federal funds allocated to USDS may only be used for the same kind of work USDS performed on January 19, 2025. Additionally, USDS may not participate in any project or initiative that was initiated by a covered entity on or after January 20, 2025. This operates as a freeze on USDS scope of work as of a specific date and a bright‑line bar on collaboration in newly initiated DOGE projects, forcing USDS to separate legacy digital‑service work from any new DOGE‑originated initiatives.
Ban on federal funds to covered entities and individuals
Outside the narrow USDS carve‑out, the bill forbids agencies from obligating, expending, transferring, or otherwise making federal funds available to any covered entity. It also bars the use of federal funds by covered individuals—this includes access to federally purchased equipment—and forbids implementing or enforcing any order, directive, or recommendation issued by a covered individual under the color of government. Together these clauses target both organizational funding flows and the operational authority of individuals associated with DOGE, broadening the funding restriction beyond grants and contracts to day‑to‑day use of federal resources.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Agency decisionmakers and CIOs: The bill removes a centralized DOGE authority from directing agency operations with federal dollars, restoring budgetary control and discretion over which modernization projects receive funding.
- United States Digital Service staff and legacy projects: By preserving USDS funding for activities as of January 19, 2025, the bill protects existing USDS portfolios and contracts that were in place before the DOGE initiatives began.
- Contractors and vendors not affiliated with DOGE projects: Providers who won or will win work through traditional agency procurements (outside DOGE initiatives) avoid displacement by a funded DOGE program and retain access to agency contracts.
- Congressional appropriations and oversight committees: The measure strengthens Congress's leverage over cross‑agency reorganization by applying a clear appropriation restriction to a set of executive initiatives.
Who Bears the Cost
- United States DOGE Service and affiliated entities: The statute cuts off federal funding and voids the financial basis for DOGE‑initiated projects and organizations, threatening their operations and contracts.
- Covered individuals (employees, contractors, volunteers): Those associated with DOGE after January 20, 2025 lose access to federal resources and are prevented from having their directives enforced using federal funds, which could end or limit their government roles.
- Federal agencies that planned to rely on DOGE support: Agencies expecting technical assistance, shared services, or policy direction from DOGE will need to find alternate providers or bring work back in‑house, potentially increasing costs and delaying projects.
- Government contractors tied to DOGE projects: Companies that bid on or executed contracts initiated by DOGE may face deobligation risk, contract termination, or complex contract reformation if funding pathways are cut.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits Congress’s appropriations power and desire to block a particular executive reorganization against the executive branch’s need for flexible, centrally coordinated tools to modernize and streamline government functions; it solves the political problem of stopping DOGE funding but creates operational and legal friction for agencies that relied on centralized, cross‑agency technical support.
The bill’s strength is also its ambiguity. It uses funding prohibitions to block executive actions, but it does not specify how to treat funds that were obligated before January 20, 2025 or contracts with multi‑year funding streams that touch on covered initiatives.
Agencies and contracting officers will need to interpret whether legally binding obligations that predate the cutoff survive the statute or whether they must stop performance and seek reappropriation. The statute also leaves unresolved how to determine whether a given activity was "initiated by" a covered entity—a factual inquiry that could hinge on informal planning, interagency coordination, or prior work by contractors.
Definitions create secondary headaches. "Covered individual" reaches former leaders who "at any point" headed or controlled a covered entity and reaches volunteers and consultants, which could exclude a large set of people from participating in federally funded activities even where their role was peripheral. The USDS carve‑out—allowing work "in the same manner as it was provided on January 19, 2025"—is operationally vague: agencies will need to document historical baselines for USDS activities, measure any deviation, and justify continued funding under that standard.
Finally, the bill's broad sweep raises separation‑of‑powers and administrative law questions: Congress is using appropriations power to defund executive initiatives, but the absence of express remedial or enforcement provisions means much will turn on administrative compliance processes and potential litigation.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.