The End Gun Violence Act of 2025 would amend title 18 of the U.S. Code to prohibit the sale or other disposition of any firearm or ammunition to a person who has been convicted of a violent misdemeanor within the preceding five years. It defines “violent misdemeanor” to cover offenses that involve the use or threatened use of physical force or a deadly weapon, or the intent to cause injury, or knowingly causing injury, and it clarifies when a conviction counts for purposes of this law.
The bill also makes a package of conforming amendments to related provisions and sets limits on when the changes apply, while preserving existing prohibitions and not altering state or tribal laws.
At a Glance
What It Does
It adds a new prohibition to 18 U.S.C. 922(d) banning the sale or disposition of firearms to anyone convicted of a violent misdemeanor within the last five years. It also defines “violent misdemeanor” and aligns related statutes so the prohibition is enforceable in background checks and transfers.
Who It Affects
Federally licensed firearms dealers and other parties involved in transfers; individuals with qualifying violent misdemeanor convictions; and federal, state, and local background-check systems that process these transfers.
Why It Matters
This creates a precise, federal standard tying firearm eligibility to a defined subset of violent misdemeanor convictions, aiming to reduce access to firearms for a segment deemed higher-risk and to improve consistency across jurisdictions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill focuses firearm eligibility on a specific, defined risk group. It creates a new prohibition under 18 U.S.C. 922(d) that prevents the sale or disposition of firearms to a person convicted of a violent misdemeanor within the prior five years.
To qualify as a “violent misdemeanor,” the offense must be a misdemeanor under federal, state, tribal, or local law and involve the use or threatened use of physical force or a deadly weapon, or include intent to injure, or actual injury. The conviction requirements are framed to respect due process and civil rights safeguards, including representation by counsel and jury trial rights, with exceptions only where those rights were waived.
The bill also makes a set of conforming amendments to several related provisions to ensure nationwide consistency in background checks and prohibitions, and it provides that the changes will take effect six months after enactment. The overall aim is to create clearer, enforceable criteria for who may not receive firearms, while preserving existing prohibitions and recognizing state and local legal frameworks.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a new prohibition on firearm sales to individuals convicted of a violent misdemeanor within the last five years.
A “violent misdemeanor” is defined as a misdemeanor that involves force, deadly weapons, or intent to injure, with specific due-process protections around what counts as a conviction.
The bill includes conforming amendments to related sections (e.g.
922(t), 923(d), Brady Act provisions, and NICS) to align cross-references with the new prohibition.
Applicability is limited: the amendments do not apply to convictions before six months after enactment, and existing prohibitions remain intact.
The rule of construction states the act does not alter key prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. 922 and does not constrain state or local laws.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Defines the Act as the End Gun Violence Act of 2025. Sets forth the official designation to be used in legal texts and references, establishing the scope and naming convention for the bill’s provisions.
Prohibition on sale or other disposition of a firearm or ammunition to a person convicted of a violent misdemeanor
Adds a new clause to 18 U.S.C. 922(d) prohibiting the sale or disposition of any firearm or ammunition to a person who has been convicted of a violent misdemeanor within the preceding five years. This creates a concrete eligibility bar for transfers and purchases, reinforcing background-check outcomes with a time-bound conviction standard.
Definition of violent misdemeanor
Adds a new subsection to 18 U.S.C. 921(a) defining “violent misdemeanor” as a misdemeanor offense that involves (i) the use or threatened use of physical force or a deadly weapon; (ii) the intent to cause physical injury; or (iii) knowingly causing physical injury. It also requires that a conviction satisfy due-process safeguards, including counsel representation and jury trial rights, with carve-outs for waivers and certain pardons or expungements unless civil rights are restored. This structure aims to ensure the definition targets meaningful violence while preserving due process.
Conforming amendments
Amends multiple subsections across title 18 to harmonize references with the new violent-misdemeanor prohibition. The changes adjust language around knowing sale or disposition, Brady Act provisions, and related background-check mechanics so the new rule functions coherently within existing firearm-transfer law.
Applicability
Specifies that the amendments do not apply to convictions that occur before the date six months after enactment. This creates a phased implementation window and reduces transitional disruption for legacy cases.
Rule of construction
Affirms that the Act does not alter existing prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. 922(d)(8) or (g)(8) and does not limit state, tribal, or local law. This preserves prior prohibitions and avoids preemption or overreach into state enforcement regimes.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Criminal Justice across all five countries.
Explore Criminal Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Victims of gun violence and their families, who gain from stricter access controls on offenders with violent histories.
- Federally licensed firearm dealers (FFLs) and compliance professionals, who benefit from a clear, nationwide standard that clarifies eligibility and lowers risk of illegal transfers.
- Background-check infrastructure operators (ATF, FBI/NICS) and state authorities, which gain from standardized, enforceable rules that improve transfer screening.
- Courts and prosecutors in jurisdictions with violent-misdemeanor cases, through clearer alignment between conviction records and firearm eligibility determinations.
- Public safety advocates and policy stakeholders who prioritize reduced access to firearms for high-risk individuals.
Who Bears the Cost
- Violent-misdemeanor offenders who would be barred from purchasing or possessing firearms for the five-year window.
- FFLs and retailers that must update processes, training, and record-keeping to reflect the new prohibition.
- State and local agencies that administer background checks and produce conviction records, which may incur administrative costs to implement new definitions and check procedures.
- The NICS/ATF infrastructure, which must accommodate updated cross-references and ensure data accuracy and timely flagging of restricted transfers.
- Potential civil liberties concerns or transitional compliance costs as jurisdictions implement the new rules across varied legal landscapes.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing public safety through a robust, uniform standard for firearm eligibility against the risk of overreach, due process concerns, and implementation complexity across jurisdictions.
The bill raises several policy tensions. On one hand, widening the net of restrictions on firearm access for violent misdemeanor offenders could enhance safety by limiting access to guns among individuals with a demonstrated propensity for violence.
On the other hand, defining what counts as a “violent misdemeanor” risks over-criminalization or retroactive application in ways that affect individuals whose offenses and contexts differ across jurisdictions. The reliance on conviction-based triggers also raises questions about record accuracy, expungement, and civil-rights restoration, particularly in states with divergent procedures.
The formal adoption of new cross-references across multiple sections will require careful implementation to avoid gaps or inconsistencies in background checks and prohibitions. The law’s phased applicability mitigates some transition risks but invites ongoing scrutiny regarding how pre-enactment convictions are treated in practice and how state courts interpret “violent misdemeanor” elements.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.