The bill amends 18 U.S.C. §1362 to explicitly include facilities that provide broadband internet access service within the statute’s protection against destruction or injury. It broadens the statute’s reach to cover facilities not operated by the United States and removes an exception tied to military and civil defense use, while adding a statutory definition of “broadband internet access service” that excludes dial‑up and permits the FCC to designate functional equivalents.
This change makes damaging fiber, towers, satellite ground stations, and other civilian broadband infrastructure subject to federal criminal exposure under §1362. The FCC’s ability to recognize functional equivalents means newer or hybrid transmission technologies can be swept into the statute’s scope without further congressional action, which has implications for providers, prosecutors, and network operators planning security and compliance strategies.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts broadband facilities into the phrase “means of communication,” expands covered facilities to those not operated by the United States, removes an exemption for systems used for military or civil defense functions, and defines “broadband internet access service” while excluding dial‑up. It also authorizes the FCC to determine whether other services are functional equivalents.
Who It Affects
The amendment directly touches broadband internet service providers (wireline, fixed wireless, and satellite), owners and maintainers of network infrastructure (towers, fiber, PoPs), contractors and subcontractors who service that equipment, law enforcement and federal prosecutors, and the FCC.
Why It Matters
By clarifying that civilian broadband infrastructure is protected under federal criminal law, the bill centralizes a legal remedy for serious attacks on commercial networks and creates a mechanism for the statute’s scope to evolve with technology through FCC determinations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill makes explicit what the original text of 18 U.S.C. §1362 left implied: facilities that carry broadband internet traffic are treated as protected “means of communication” for purposes of federal criminal prohibitions on destruction and injury. Rather than rely on courts or prosecutors to read broadband into older language, the amendment adds a specific reference to facilities used to provide broadband service.
The draft also eliminates language that limited the statute’s reach when facilities were used for military or civil defense. Removing that carve‑out means the protection applies uniformly to civilian broadband infrastructure regardless of whether a particular circuit, location, or piece of equipment also serves defense-related functions.The bill defines “broadband internet access service” as a mass‑market retail service capable of sending and receiving data to essentially all internet endpoints, expressly excluding dial‑up access.
Crucially, it adds a backstop: the Federal Communications Commission may designate other services as functional equivalents. That gives regulators the ability to bring emergent or hybrid technologies—think low‑earth‑orbit satellite networks or novel fixed wireless systems—within the statute's protection without more congressional amendments.Finally, the amendment broadens who is covered: it clarifies that protections apply to facilities not only “operated or controlled by the United States” but also those operated by any other person or entity.
In practice, that means private operators of commercial broadband infrastructure will be covered by the federal criminal prohibition against destruction and injury under §1362, subject to how courts interpret the statute's remaining elements.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill inserts the phrase “including facilities used to provide broadband internet access service” into 18 U.S.C. §1362’s definition of protected means of communication.
It removes the existing exception for facilities “used or intended to be used for the military or civil defense functions of the United States,” eliminating that carve‑out.
The amendment adds “or by any other person or entity” after references to facilities operated or controlled by the United States, expanding coverage to privately owned infrastructure.
It defines “broadband internet access service” as a mass‑market retail service that transmits data to and from all or substantially all internet endpoints and expressly excludes dial‑up internet access.
The FCC may find and designate other services as functional equivalents, enabling the statute to cover future or alternative broadband technologies without additional legislation.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Explicitly adds broadband facilities to protected communications infrastructure
The bill inserts the clause “including facilities used to provide broadband internet access service” immediately after “means of communication.” That mechanical change clarifies that the statute applies to the physical plant and equipment that make broadband access possible (fiber, cable, wireless base stations, etc.). For practitioners, the immediate implication is that actions against those assets can be charged under §1362 rather than relying on analogy or alternative statutes.
Extends coverage to privately operated facilities
By adding “or by any other person or entity,” the amendment removes any ambiguity that §1362 only reached facilities operated by the United States. The practical effect is to bring private and commercial networks squarely within the statute, creating federal criminal exposure for attacks on privately owned broadband assets that were previously thought to be primarily matters for state law or other federal statutes.
Removes exception tied to military and civil defense use
The bill strikes language excluding facilities used or intended for military or civil defense functions. That change eliminates a particular limitation that could have narrowed prosecutions in cases where equipment served both civilian and defense roles. Removing the exception simplifies the statute’s coverage but raises implementation questions when civilian networks overlap with defense communications.
Creates a statutory broadband definition and grants the FCC power to identify equivalents
The added definition frames broadband as a mass‑market retail service that transmits data to and from all or substantially all internet endpoints and excludes dial‑up. Importantly, paragraph (2) allows the Federal Communications Commission to determine that other services are functionally equivalent and therefore covered. That gives the FCC a gatekeeping role over the statute’s technological scope and allows newer architectures to be incorporated without further congressional amendment.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Infrastructure across all five countries.
Explore Infrastructure in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Broadband providers (ISPs, cable companies, satellite operators): They gain an explicit federal criminal backstop against intentional destruction of network assets, which strengthens deterrence and supports corporate security arguments to investors and regulators.
- Consumers and businesses dependent on broadband: Users of critical online services benefit indirectly if the added legal risk deters attacks that would cause outages or data interruptions.
- Federal and state law enforcement cooperating on major incidents: Prosecutors get a clear federal statutory tool to pursue large‑scale or interstate attacks on broadband infrastructure that cross jurisdictions.
Who Bears the Cost
- Private network owners and operators: Although the bill doesn't impose affirmative duties, owners face greater exposure to federal criminal statutes and may need to invest more in physical security, logging, and coordination with law enforcement.
- Contractors and maintenance personnel: Individuals and firms that work on network plant could be more readily swept into investigations or prosecutions if conduct is alleged to have damaged protected facilities.
- Federal prosecutors and the judiciary: Expanding the statute’s scope likely increases caseloads and requires prosecutors, defenders, and courts to litigate new statutory interpretations (e.g., what counts as a functional equivalent).
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits two legitimate aims: protect rapidly evolving civilian broadband infrastructure as a matter of national resilience versus expanding federal criminal reach and delegating scope decisions to the FCC, which may produce uncertainty and litigation over what technologies are covered and when federal prosecution is appropriate.
Two implementation risks stand out. First, the bill expands statutory scope while leaving interpretive work to courts and the FCC.
The FCC’s authority to designate “functional equivalents” creates a moving target: regulators can bring emerging architectures into the statute’s protection, but this delegation also invites litigation over the boundaries of that authority and about what traffic‑routing patterns qualify as covering “all or substantially all internet endpoints.”
Second, the amendment federalizes protection for privately owned civilian infrastructure and removes a military/civil defense carve‑out. That reduces legal uncertainty about whether commercial networks are covered, but it also raises coordination and federalism questions.
State and local prosecutors currently handle many property‑damage and vandalism cases; merging broad classes of civilian infrastructure into §1362’s reach will require intergovernmental cooperation and may strain prosecutorial resources. The bill does not modify penalties, mens rea, or procedural mechanisms in §1362 itself, so many prosecutorial and evidentiary questions (intent, causation, scope of covered facilities) remain to be worked out in practice.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.