HB 2889, the Online Consumer Protection Act, would treat violations of terms of service and related materials by social media platforms and online marketplaces as unfair or deceptive acts or practices, enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The bill requires platforms to publish terms of service in a machine-readable format and to include a consumer protection policy that covers use terms, data practices, content ownership, and the handling of user content, with additional topics the Commission deems appropriate.
It then creates a formal consumer-protection program within each platform or marketplace, including a dedicated consumer protection officer, risk assessment and mitigation requirements, staff training, annual FTC filings, and explicit enforcement mechanisms. The bill also provides for a private right of action, bans pre-dispute arbitration, and extends FTC enforcement tools to actions brought by states.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires platforms to publish machine-readable terms of service, covering payment methods, content ownership, third-party sharing, disclaimers, and other topics the FTC may designate. It also mandates consumer-protection policies for social platforms and marketplaces, outlining blocking/removal decisions, appeals, user notifications, and remedies.
Who It Affects
Social media platforms and online marketplaces with significant reach or revenue, their compliance teams and officers, and both consumers and sellers using those platforms.
Why It Matters
Establishes a federal baseline for platform governance, improves transparency for users, and strengthens enforcement against unfair or deceptive practices in online services.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Online Consumer Protection Act would redesign how major online platforms govern terms of service and user interactions. Section 2 requires social media platforms and online marketplaces to publish terms of service in a machine-readable format, including core elements such as payment terms, content ownership, data sharing, and liability notices, and to adopt a consumer protection policy that outlines how content is governed, how actions like blocking or removing content are decided, and how users are notified and able to appeal.
It also directs the Commission to consider additional topics the FTC deems appropriate. For platforms, the policy must specify how users can request content changes, how notices are delivered, and how appeals are processed, including whether content blocking or account termination can be challenged and how outcomes are communicated.
A subset of protections specifically addresses cyber harassment and the conditions under which users and sellers may seek remedies on marketplaces.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires machine-readable terms of service covering payment, ownership, sharing, and liability.
Platforms must publish a consumer protection policy detailing content rules, notification and appeal processes, and remedies.
Online marketplaces must disclose product descriptions, recalls, fraud-reporting mechanisms, and remedies for users and sellers.
Platforms must implement a formal consumer protection program with an officer and annual FTC filings.
The act includes a private right of action, bans pre-dispute arbitration, and expands FTC/state enforcement options.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Terms of Service Requirements for Social Media Platforms and Online Marketplaces
This section requires every social media platform and online marketplace to establish, maintain, and publicly publish terms of service in a machine-readable format. The terms must cover payment methods, content ownership (including user-generated content), third-party sharing policies, and liability-notice provisions. The consumer-protection policy must detail permitted and prohibited behavior, action grounds for blocking or terminating service, user notification and appeal rights, and any other topics the Commission deems appropriate. The practical effect is to standardize what users and sellers must expect and be able to access in a readily machine-readable form for audits and comparisons.
Consumer Protection Program
This section requires platforms to implement a comprehensive consumer protection program. It mandates policies and procedures for consumer protection and content moderation, including compliance with federal and local laws, risk mitigation related to content and product information, staff training, and disclosure requirements. A consumer protection officer must be appointed and report directly to the CEO, and the program must include controls to monitor and mitigate risks associated with hosting content or products. The size and complexity of the entity guide tailoring the program and its costs.
Enforcement
Enforcement is split across FTC-led oversight, private remedies, and state enforcement. Violations are treated as FTC act-style unfair or deceptive practices, with the FTC empowered to enforce using its existing authorities. Individuals can sue for damages and attorney’s fees, and the act bans pre-dispute arbitration agreements and joint-action waivers for disputes arising under the act. State attorneys general can pursue enforcement and coordinate with the FTC, including allowing the FTC to intervene in state actions. This creates a multi-front enforcement environment to ensure compliance.
Relationship to Other Laws
Section 5 clarifies that Section 230 of the Communications Act does not shield violations of this act, and that nothing in the act preempts state or local laws beyond its own enforcement framework. It also preserves severability, so if one provision is invalid, the rest remain in force. The intent is a federal baseline that coexists with state laws and existing regulations rather than supplanting them.
FTC Enforcement Authority
Section 6 adds to the FTC’s toolkit by ensuring the FTC retains authority to enforce this act alongside existing acts. It also specifies the applicability of the amendment to actions or proceedings started after enactment, strengthening the FTC’s ability to pursue platform-level violations under the act over time.
Definitions
This section provides precise definitions for terms used throughout the act: Commission (FTC), consumer product, cyber harassment, online marketplace, seller, social media platform, and user. Clear definitions are intended to minimize ambiguity in applying the act to diverse platforms and products.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Privacy across all five countries.
Explore Privacy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Consumers who use social media and online marketplaces will benefit from clearer, machine-readable terms and accessible protections when content is moderated or removed.
- Users who experience cyber harassment will gain explicit tools, notification, and appeal processes to defend themselves and challenge harmful actions.
- The Federal Trade Commission gains a clearer framework and more robust enforcement capabilities to police unfair and deceptive practices online.
- State Attorneys General gain a mechanism to coordinate with the FTC and pursue enforcement on behalf of residents.
- Platform compliance teams and Chief Compliance Officers will work under defined requirements, increasing predictability and standardization of protections.
- Sellers on marketplaces will see clearer reporting, recall notices, and remedies when actions are taken on reports or violations.
Who Bears the Cost
- Platform operators will incur costs to build and maintain the consumer protection program, appoint a dedicated officer, and file annual disclosures with the FTC.
- Online marketplaces will face costs related to product descriptions controls, recall notices, and the disclosures required by the annual filings.
- Smaller platforms that meet thresholds will bear compliance costs, potentially incentivizing consolidation or increased pricing.
- Sellers may incur costs to respond to user reports, appeals, and processes for refunds or other remedies.
- State agencies may need budget adjustments to support enforcement and coordination with the FTC.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether stronger federal rules on platform governance deliver meaningful protections without stifling innovation or imposing unsustainable compliance costs for platforms, especially smaller players.
The act raises legitimate policy tensions around how to balance consumer protection with platform innovation and operational costs. The requirement for machine-readable terms, annual FTC reporting, and a dedicated consumer protection officer imposes ongoing compliance expenses that could be particularly burdensome for smaller platforms.
At the same time, expanding private rights of action and banning pre-dispute arbitration increases potential litigation risk and costs for platforms and sellers. The interplay with existing state consumer-protection regimes and the broader regulatory landscape will shape how aggressively the act is implemented and enforced, and how adaptable the program will be as technologies and user behaviors evolve.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.