The ALERT Act adds a new chapter to Title 5 directing every federal agency to submit to the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) a monthly list of rules it expects to propose or finalize during the coming 12 months and specific metadata about each rule. Required items include a summary and docket/RIN, legal basis and statutory or judicial deadlines, whether the agency will conduct cost‑benefit analysis, stage of rulemaking, whether the rule is subject to section 610 review, and—when a notice of proposed rulemaking has been issued—an approximate schedule, a seven‑tier cost bracket, an estimate of economic effects (including unfunded mandates and job impacts), and any influential scientific information with peer‑review plans and URLs.
OIRA must publish agency submissions online within 30 days and compile an annual Federal Register assessment (by October 1) that lists proposed and finalized rules, indicates whether cost‑benefit analyses were done, reports total costs of rules without offsetting benefits, and makes cost analyses available online. The Act bars a rule from taking effect until the agency’s OIRA‑published information about that rule has been public for at least six months, subject to exemptions (certain rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and narrow presidential emergency/trade/national security/criminal enforcement exceptions).
The bill frontloads data and timing requirements that will change agency workflows, OIRA’s role, and how regulated entities plan for future obligations.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires agency heads to submit monthly to OIRA the list of rules expected to be proposed or finalized in the next 12 months plus specific metadata (RIN/docket, legal basis, analysis plans, stage). OIRA must publish submissions online within 30 days and produce an annual Federal Register summary with cost tallies and lists of reviewed rules.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies and their rule‑writing units, OIRA/OMB (new publication and aggregation duties), regulated entities and compliance officers who monitor future obligations, researchers and public interest groups that use cost, jobs, and scientific information to evaluate rules.
Why It Matters
The statute creates a single, public feed of the federal regulatory pipeline and forces agencies to disclose cost and job‑impact estimates and scientific inputs in advance, shifting both transparency and operational burdens onto agencies and OIRA and introducing an enforced minimum delay before many rules take effect.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Under the ALERT Act agencies must, every month, send OIRA a forecast of rules they expect to propose or finalize over the following 12 months and a short packet of details about each item. That packet includes a short summary, the regulation identifier number and docket number, the objectives and legal basis (and any statutory or judicial deadlines), the rule’s current stage, whether it’s subject to a section 610 review, and whether the agency intends to claim the narrow notice‑and‑comment exemption in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
If an agency has already published a general notice of proposed rulemaking for an item it expects to finalize within 12 months, the monthly submission must also include an approximate schedule for completing the rule, an estimate of the rule’s magnitude using one of seven cost brackets (from under $50 million to $10 billion or more), any considered estimate of economic effects (including unfunded mandates and the rule’s projected net effect on U.S. jobs, or an affirmative statement that no such estimate was considered), and a list of any influential scientific information associated with the rule. For each scientific item the agency must identify peer‑review plans, the dates the material or peer review was or will be received and publicly disclosed, and a URL for the material; if dates change the agency must briefly explain the change.OIRA must post each agency’s monthly submission to the Internet within 30 days and compile a cumulative annual assessment to appear in the Federal Register by October 1 each year.
That annual package must show for the prior year which rules were proposed and finalized and whether agencies did cost‑benefit analyses, which rules were repealed or reduced, total costs of rules (reported without netting benefits), and a list of items subject to OMB review, section 610 reviews, GAO submissions, and congressional disapproval resolutions. The bill also requires OIRA to publish cost/benefit analyses online for every proposed or final rule from the prior year, and for the first annual publication OIRA must include any such analyses it can find from the previous ten years.The statute then ties timing to transparency: a rule generally cannot take effect until the OIRA Internet posting containing the required information has been public for six months.
Two categories of exceptions permit immediate effect: rules where the agency claims the 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) exemption, and rules the President directs to take effect immediately for narrowly enumerated reasons (e.g., imminent threats to health or safety, criminal enforcement, national security, or under statutes implementing international trade agreements). The bill defines terms by reference to 5 U.S.C. 551 and borrows the Congressional Budget Act definition of unfunded mandates.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Agencies must make the first monthly submission to OIRA within 30 days of enactment and then submit monthly thereafter, listing rules expected to be proposed or finalized in the next 12 months.
For rules with a published NPRM expected to finalize within 12 months, agencies must place the rule into one of seven cost brackets: < $50M; $50–100M; $100–500M; $500M–$1B; $1B–$5B; $5B–$10B; ≥ $10B.
Agencies must report any influential scientific information tied to a rule, including peer‑review plans, receipt and public disclosure dates (and explanations for changes), and Internet addresses where the material or peer review will appear.
A rule may not take effect until the OIRA Internet posting about that rule has been public for at least six months, except where the agency claims the 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) exemption or the President invokes narrow emergency/national security/criminal enforcement/trade exceptions.
OIRA’s annual Federal Register report (due Oct 1) must list proposed and finalized rules and indicate whether cost‑benefit analyses were conducted; it must also report the total cost of all proposed/final rules without offsetting benefits, and the first such report must include available cost/benefit analyses from the prior 10 years.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Monthly agency submissions to OIRA
This section creates the core reporting duty: the head of each agency must submit monthly to OIRA a packet describing every rule the agency expects to propose or finalize in the next 12 months. The packet must include identifiers (RIN and docket), the rule’s objectives and legal basis (and whether that basis prevents cost‑benefit work), the rule’s stage, whether section 610 review applies, and, where an NPRM is already out, schedule, cost‑bracket estimates, considered economic effects (including unfunded mandates and jobs), and any influential scientific information with peer‑review metadata. Practically, agencies will need an internal process to flag items for the monthly feed, standardize cost‑bracket estimates, and track peer‑review timelines for scientific inputs.
OIRA must publish agency submissions online within 30 days
OIRA must post each agency’s monthly submission to the Internet no later than 30 days after receipt. That creates a public, agency‑specific monthly snapshot of the regulatory pipeline. Agencies will face immediate transparency of their near‑term plans; OIRA must determine formats, quality controls, and whether any sensitive or protected material must be redacted or withheld under other statutes.
Annual cumulative assessment; Federal Register and online disclosures
OIRA must compile an annual report, publish it in the Federal Register by October 1, and make further materials available online. The annual package must list proposed and finalized rules, note whether agencies performed cost‑benefit analyses or claimed procedural exemptions, identify rules repealed or narrowed, and publish the raw cost analyses (for the preceding year). The statute also requires OIRA to report which rules were reviewed by OMB, which underwent section 610 reviews, which were submitted to GAO under section 801, and which prompted congressional disapproval resolutions. The bill forces OIRA to assemble both granular datasets and narrative tallies for oversight use.
Six‑month pre‑effect rule prohibition with narrow exceptions
This provision prevents a rule from taking legal effect until the OIRA posting containing the required information has been online for at least six months. The bill carves out two categories of exceptions: any rule for which an agency claims the 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) exemption, and rules the President directs to take immediate effect because of imminent health/safety threats, criminal enforcement needs, national security, or statutes implementing international trade agreements. In practice, agencies must decide whether to rely on 553(b)(B) or seek a presidential determination for time‑sensitive actions, and litigants may test those choices.
Definitions, and phased effective dates for submissions, annual reports, and the six‑month rule
The chapter borrows definitions from 5 U.S.C. 551 and the Congressional Budget Act for 'unfunded mandate.' The bill phases implementation: first monthly submissions are due within 30 days of enactment; OIRA’s annual publication duties take effect 60 days after enactment with the first annual Federal Register report the first October 1 after that; the first annual report must include available cost/benefit analyses from the prior 10 years; and the six‑month pre‑effect requirement becomes effective eight months after enactment. The phased timetable gives agencies and OIRA limited breathing room but quickly brings reporting requirements online.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Congressional oversight committees and GAO — gain a centralized, machine‑readable feed of agencies’ near‑term rule pipelines and standardized cost/job metrics to inform oversight, oversight hearings, and legislative responses.
- Regulated entities and corporate compliance teams — receive longer, predictable lead times and standardized advance signals about upcoming obligations (schedules, cost brackets, and scientific inputs) to plan investments, product changes, and compliance timelines.
- Public‑interest researchers, think tanks, and advocacy organizations — obtain consolidated access to cost‑estimates, job‑impact statements, and influential scientific materials (with peer‑review metadata) that support independent analysis and public comment.
- OIRA and OMB leadership — obtain official, comparable visibility across the entire executive branch pipeline, enhancing the ability to coordinate priorities, identify rule clusters, and present unified summaries to the President and Congress.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies and rulewriting offices — must build processes, staff, and information systems to produce monthly submissions, standardize cost‑bracket estimates and job‑impact statements, track peer‑review timelines, and support public URLs and explanations.
- OIRA/OMB — must ingest, validate, publish, and maintain monthly submissions and an annual Federal Register package (including back‑fills of prior analyses), which requires additional staff, editorial review, IT infrastructure, and legal screening.
- Smaller agencies and independent agencies with limited budgets — face disproportionate administrative burdens because the statute imposes uniform monthly reporting and publication duties without providing specific appropriations or phased technical support.
- Regulated parties seeking quick regulatory fixes — will see delayed effective dates due to the six‑month posting requirement, raising costs for stakeholders who need rapid regulatory changes or clarifications.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is transparency versus regulatory agility and administrative cost: the Act advances public accountability by forcing agencies to disclose near‑term rule plans, cost brackets, and scientific inputs, but those same disclosures and the mandated six‑month pre‑effect window will slow regulation, require substantial new administrative capacity at both agencies and OIRA, and risk politicizing provisional analyses—forcing policymakers to choose between openness and the ability to act quickly and flexibly.
The bill fronts transparency but raises difficult implementation questions. First, the law relies on agencies’ internal forecasts and estimates (cost brackets, job impacts, and lists of influential science).
Those inputs are inherently uncertain and susceptible to conservative or optimistic bias, intentional gaming, or strategic timing (e.g., postponing an NPRM to avoid the six‑month window). OIRA will need rules for validation, standardized methodologies, and quality control to prevent the disclosure regime from producing misleading signals that distort markets or oversight.
Second, the six‑month pause before a rule may take effect pits predictability against regulatory agility. Although the statute carves out exemptions (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and presidential determinations), the lines are not always clear in practice.
Agencies operating under statutory deadlines, court orders, or fast‑moving public‑health crises could face awkward choices: invoke an exemption and risk later legal challenge, or delay substantive protections to comply with the posting timetable. The bill’s requirement to report total costs “without reducing the cost by any offsetting benefits” also risks skewing public perception — tallies will emphasize gross costs and downplay benefits that agencies may conceive but not quantify, creating an asymmetric record for oversight and media narratives.
Finally, the Act creates data management, classification, and disclosure tensions. Agencies must publish peer‑review plans and URLs for influential scientific materials but must also safeguard sensitive information, deliberative material, and classified or proprietary data.
OIRA will need to develop redaction protocols and interface with FOIA/Privacy Act regimes. The statutory back‑fill requirement for the first annual publication (collecting up to 10 years of analyses) could expose patchy historical records and raise debates about how to treat missing or non‑standardized past analyses.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.