The Border Airport Fairness Act of 2025 would require the President to designate certain airports as ports of entry under existing customs law and to terminate the current user fee requirement for those airports. The bill targets airports that are primary airports, located within 30 miles of the U.S. border, and connected via a formal instrument to a land border crossing or seaport.
It also directs these airports to meet the standard CBP port-of-entry criteria set forth in Treasury Decisions and related guidance or successors. The action is anchored in long-standing customs framework and would not by itself establish new funding streams or staffing, but it would reclassify these airports within the federal border-entry network.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires the President to designate eligible airports as ports of entry and to terminate the associated user fee requirement for those airports under the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984. It ties designation to existing primary airport status and proximity/association criteria, using CBP standards as the benchmark.
Who It Affects
Airports that meet the proximity and legal-association criteria, CBP operations at those facilities, and travelers and shippers who use border-crossing air routes connected to these airports.
Why It Matters
Designating additional airports as ports of entry can streamline cross-border travel and trade at key border points, potentially reducing congestion at other ports and altering how border-related fees are collected.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act aims to formalize a set of border-adjacent airports as ports of entry. It does this by requiring the President to designate airports that are within 30 miles of the northern or southern border and that have a formal linkage to a border-crossing or seaport, ensuring they meet the standard criteria used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection for ports of entry.
In tandem with these designations, the bill eliminates the current user-fee requirement that applies to those airports, under the 1984 Trade Act. The practical effect is to broaden the set of official entry points for cross-border travel and air cargo at a federal level, while aligning designated airports with established CBP port-of-entry standards.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill designates airports within 30 miles of the U.S. border as ports of entry.
It terminates the user fee requirement under 19 U.S.C. 58b for those airports.
Airports must be primary airports as defined by 49 U.S.C. 47102 and connected to a border-crossing or seaport by a formal instrument.
Designation relies on CBP port-of-entry criteria as laid out in Treasury Decisions 82–37, 86–14, 87–65, or successor guidance.
Authority for designation rests with the President under the 1914 Act authorizing ports of entry.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This section provides the act’s formal citation as the Border Airport Fairness Act of 2025. It establishes the federal framework for designating airports near the border as ports of entry and signals the bill’s alignment with existing customs and border-control structures.
In General — Designation and Fee Termination
Section 2(a) requires the President to designate eligible airports as ports of entry and to terminate the existing user-fee requirement for those airports. The designation leverages the statutory authority to designate ports of entry and relies on established border-control processes to determine which airports qualify for entry-point status.
Airports Described — Criteria
This subsection defines the airports that qualify: (1) they must be primary airports as defined in 49 U.S.C. 47102; (2) they must be within 30 miles of the northern or southern international border; (3) they must be formally associated with a land border crossing or seaport within 30 miles via a valid contractual or governmental instrument; and (4) they must meet the numerical criteria CBP uses for establishing a port of entry, as set forth in Treasury Decisions 82-37 (and revisions) or successor guidance.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Border-area airports within 30 miles of the border gain official port-of-entry status, potentially increasing cross-border traveler and cargo activity.
- Airlines and airport authorities serving designated facilities may see higher traffic and revenue opportunities due to new entry points.
- Local border communities could experience economic benefits from improved access and increased cross-border travel and commerce.
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection gains clear statutory authority to operate ports of entry at designated airports.
- Cross-border shippers and logistics providers may benefit from more predictable and potentially streamlined processing at designated airports.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies (CBP and DHS) may incur administrative costs to implement, supervise, and maintain new port-of-entry operations at designated airports.
- Airport authorities and local governments may bear costs to meet port requirements, including legal instruments, security, staffing, and equipment upgrades.
- The federal government would forego the user-fee revenue previously collected under 19 U.S.C. 58b for the designated airports.
- Budgetary implications to taxpayers may arise from ongoing federal administration of the expanded port-of-entry framework.
- Aircraft operators and airlines could face new compliance and operating considerations tied to the port designation and related procedures.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is balancing a broader, more accessible border-entry network via airport ports of entry against the budgetary, security, and operational demands of running additional entry points under CBP oversight.
The bill ties designation to CBP standards and Treasury Decisions governing port-of-entry criteria, but it does not specify funding for implementation or ongoing operations beyond executive designation. Practical challenges include ensuring the designated airports can sustain security, staffing, and processing capacity, and reconciling airport operations with existing port networks and border-security objectives.
The reliance on outdated Treasury Decisions (with potential updates or successors) could create ambiguity if guidance changes, necessitating future congressional or administrative action to align with evolving border policy.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.