The bill would add a new grant program to the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring Act to support collaborative research on ocean acidification. Projects would be funded through partnerships between the seafood industry and academic researchers, with specific criteria to ensure meaningful collaboration and practical results.
The program would require a strategic plan alignment, stakeholder engagement, and dissemination of findings, and would authorize up to $5 million per year from 2026 through 2030, with federal funding not to exceed 85 percent of project costs and a minimum 15 percent non-Federal match. Implementation guidelines would be issued within 180 days of enactment and would involve a wide set of stakeholders in design and prioritization.
At a Glance
What It Does
The act creates Section 12406A to authorize grants for ocean acidification collaborative research, conducted through partnerships between the seafood industry and the academic community, and sets basic funding, eligibility, and priority rules.
Who It Affects
The program directly affects seafood industry participants (including growers and harvesters) and academic researchers, as well as coastal states, Tribes, educational institutions, and non-governmental organizations involved in ocean science and fisheries.
Why It Matters
It institutionalizes industry–academic collaboration to produce actionable research on ocean acidification, leverages industry assets for data and monitoring, and ties funding to regional needs and stakeholder input.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill proposes a new grant program under the ocean acidification policy framework to fund collaborative projects that pair seafood industry participants with academic researchers. The purpose is to address ocean acidification through joint efforts that combine scientific expertise with real-world industry data and priorities.
Proposals must align with a strategic research plan and demonstrate how industry and academic partners will work together, including how results will be shared with stakeholders.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a new grant program under Section 12406A to support industry–academic ocean acidification research.
Grants require a defined partnership between the seafood industry and the academic community, with roles and contributions from each side.
Federal funding can cover up to 85% of project costs; non-Federal match is required unless a waiver is granted.
Priority will be given to projects addressing vulnerable ecosystems, local stakeholder support, or use of seafood industry assets as research platforms.
Funding is authorized at $5 million per year for 2026–2030.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and grant authorization
The section defines who counts as the academic community and the seafood industry for purposes of these grants and authorizes the Secretary to provide grants for collaborative projects between these groups. It establishes that partnerships must be the vehicle for research on ocean acidification and sets the stage for how projects will be evaluated and funded.
Criteria for approval
Projects may be funded only if they meet explicit criteria: they must be consistent with the strategic research plan in section 12405 and designed to advance partnerships, include the seafood industry in the research process, deliver actionable results, and balance industry and academic perspectives to enrich the research agenda.
Priority considerations
Funding priority goes to projects that address ecosystems and communities vulnerable to ocean acidification, secure local stakeholder support (e.g., state or tribal entities), and utilize seafood industry assets as research and monitoring platforms, thereby embedding regional relevance into the research.
Implementation guidelines
Within 180 days of enactment, the Secretary and the coordinating Subcommittee must issue guidelines outlining criteria and priorities for grants. Guidelines should reflect input from state and local decisionmakers, industry, educators, Tribes, NGOs, and other stakeholders to ensure broad participation.
Contents of proposals
Proposals must include the qualifications of participants, a plan for full engagement of industry and academia, a dissemination plan (education, presentations, scientific publication, or government delivery), and a description of how the project aligns with the program elements described in the related section 12405(c). It also calls for any other information necessary to evaluate eligibility.
Matching and funding authorization
The bill requires non-Federal contributions to make up the remaining cost of the project so federal funding does not exceed 85 percent of total costs, with possible waivers if no reasonable matching is available and the public benefit justifies funding. It also authorizes $5 million per fiscal year for 2026–2030 to support these grants.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Shellfish growers, shellfish harvesters, and seafood industry organizations gain access to funded research and data that can guide farming, harvesting, and supply-chain decisions.
- Academic researchers and universities/centers acquire funding and collaboration opportunities, plus access to industry data and field sites that enhance study relevance.
- Coastal states, regional decisionmakers, and Tribes receive regionally informed research results that can inform policy, resource management, and adaptation planning.
- Non-governmental organizations focused on ocean science, conservation, and industry sustainability benefit from data, dissemination channels, and collaboration networks.
Who Bears the Cost
- Participating seafood industry partners must provide non-Federal matching funds or in-kind contributions to meet the 15% minimum cost share (subject to waiver when appropriate).
- Academic institutions incur administrative and coordination costs to partner on research, administer projects, and contribute to dissemination efforts.
- State and local governments may bear coordination and reporting obligations or costs associated with stakeholder engagement and implementation.
- The federal government bears the administrative and program costs of reviewing, funding, and monitoring grants, as well as ensuring compliance with reporting requirements.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to prioritize near-term, industry-anchored research that yields tangible, regional benefits or to preserve broad scientific exploration and methodological rigor when matching requirements and industry leverage are strong.
The bill creates a formal, industry–academic collaboration mechanism for ocean acidification research, with a strong emphasis on partnership, dissemination, and regional relevance. While the matching requirement ensures stakeholder commitment, waivers are allowed when no reasonable funding paths exist, which could affect project scope or scale.
A key tension will be balancing scientific independence and rigorous methods with industry-driven priorities and use of industry assets as research platforms. The implementation guidelines (due within 180 days) will determine how inclusive the program is and how strictly it enforces the alignment with the overarching strategic plan.
Finally, since funding is capped at $5 million annually, the program will need to prioritize projects carefully to maximize public benefit.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.