The TREES Act of 2025 directs the Secretary of Energy to set up a federal grant program that funds tree-planting projects designed to reduce residential energy consumption. The program explicitly links urban forestry to energy policy by funding planning, planting, short-term maintenance, training and nursery support that aim to lower household heating and cooling needs.
The bill frames the program as an equity and job opportunity: grant priorities target neighborhoods with low canopy cover, high energy burdens, and vulnerable populations, and awards should favor projects that engage communities and hire local residents. It positions the Department of Energy to coordinate with the Forest Service and retail power providers to achieve measurable residential energy savings through vegetation-based interventions.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Secretary of Energy must establish a competitive grant program (within 90 days of enactment) that funds covered tree-planting projects. Applications must describe projected residential energy savings and include cost estimates; eligible costs explicitly include planning, establishing nurseries, purchasing and planting trees, up to three years of maintenance and training.
Who It Affects
Eligible applicants are state and local government entities, Indian Tribes, 501(c)(3) nonprofits, and retail power providers—putting utilities and municipal governments alongside conservation NGOs and tribal authorities as potential grantees. Nurseries, urban forestry contractors, workforce training providers, and households in low-canopy neighborhoods are likely operational participants and recipients of benefits.
Why It Matters
The bill pairs a high federal subsidy (a 90% federal share) with an explicit planting goal (at least 300,000 trees per year) and a specified funding authorization ($50 million per year, FY2026–2030), signaling a federal push to use nature-based approaches for near-term residential energy savings and community resilience.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The TREES Act requires the Department of Energy to stand up a competitive grant program that pays most of the bill for projects that plant trees with the purpose of lowering household energy use. The Secretary must consult with the Forest Service while designing and operating the program.
Applications will need to justify how a specific planting plan will reduce residential energy consumption and estimate expected savings; they must also lay out costs and plans for community engagement and species suitability.
The bill lists eligible expenses narrowly enough to make project budgets predictable: planning and design, creating nursery capacity, purchasing and planting trees, up to three years of maintenance and training, plus other costs the Secretary permits. It also sets programmatic priorities—favoring projects that yield large energy savings for households with high energy burden, provide shade and wind protection at critical times, are in low-canopy neighborhoods, serve seniors or children, are in lower-income areas, engage the community, and hire local residents (especially the unemployed or underemployed).Operationally, the program mixes energy-policy and conservation tools.
Including retail power providers as eligible applicants signals an intent to fold tree planting into demand-side strategies. The federal share is very generous, which lowers local financing barriers but increases reliance on limited appropriations.
The maintenance funding is capped at three years, so long-term survival of plantings will depend on grantees or local entities beyond that period. The statute gives the Secretary discretion to define additional eligible costs and to shape scoring and reporting requirements when designing the application process.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires the Secretary of Energy to establish the program within 90 days of enactment.
Congress authorizes $50 million per year for FY2026–2030 to carry out the program.
The Secretary must, to the maximum extent practicable, aim to facilitate planting at least 300,000 trees each year.
The federal share for an assisted covered project is 90 percent of eligible costs.
Eligible entities include state and local government entities, Indian Tribes, 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations, and retail power providers.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Establishes the Act's name: 'Trees for Residential Energy and Economic Savings Act of 2025' (TREES Act of 2025). This is procedural but signals the bill’s framing—linking tree planting explicitly to residential energy and economic benefits.
Program establishment and timeline
Directs the Secretary of Energy to create a grant program and sets a 90-day deadline to do so after enactment. That short timeline will force the Department to set foundational program rules quickly (application forms, scoring criteria, reporting requirements) and suggests reliance on existing agency grant frameworks and interagency guidance rather than building new administrative structures from scratch.
Interagency consultation
Requires consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service. That consultation will be important for species selection, nursery capacity, and best practices on planting and maintenance, and it creates a standing role for an agency with technical arboriculture expertise even though DOE is the administering agency.
Application content requirements
Specifies what applicants must include: a description of how the project reduces residential energy use, an estimate of expected energy reductions, total eligible costs and other funding sources, plans for community engagement, and species suitability. These mandated elements give reviewers concrete, comparable metrics but also create a compliance burden—applications will need energy-estimation methods and ecological assessments, which favors applicants with technical capacity.
Priority criteria for grant awards
Lists seven priority factors—maximizing reductions for high energy-burden households; providing shade and wind protection at peak exposure times; locating projects in low canopy neighborhoods; serving areas with many seniors or children; serving lower-income areas; engaging affected communities; and employing local residents (with emphasis on the unemployed/underemployed). These priorities blend equity, energy-efficiency, and workforce objectives and will shape scoring; program designers will need to operationalize each criterion into measurable scoring rubrics.
Goals, federal share, and appropriations
Sets program goals and financing mechanics: the Secretary should, to the maximum extent practicable, facilitate planting at least 300,000 trees per year; the federal share of project costs is capped at 90 percent; Congress authorizes $50 million annually for FY2026 through FY2030. The combination of an ambitious planting target and a relatively modest authorization means DOE will have to prioritize projects or use the 90% cost share strategically to leverage other funding.
Definitions and eligible costs
Defines covered project, eligible costs (planning, nurseries, tree purchase/planting, up to 3 years maintenance, training, and other Secretary-approved costs), eligible entities (states, local governments, Indian Tribes, 501(c)(3) nonprofits, retail power providers), and energy burden. The explicit inclusion of nursery establishment and a 3-year maintenance window are operationally significant: they shape budgets and signal priorities for capacity-building but leave long-term stewardship questions unresolved.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.
Explore Energy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Households with high energy burdens in low-canopy neighborhoods — they are prioritized for projects designed to lower heating and cooling costs, potentially reducing energy bills and heat exposure.
- Local nurseries, landscapers, and urban forestry contractors — eligible cost coverage for nursery establishment, tree purchases, planting and training creates demand and revenue opportunities.
- Community-based nonprofits and tribal governments — eligibility and priority for community engagement and low-income areas direct funds to organizations that serve vulnerable populations and may increase their programmatic capacity.
- Unemployed or underemployed local residents — the bill prioritizes hiring local workers for implementation, creating short-term green jobs and training opportunities tied to funded projects.
Who Bears the Cost
- State and local grantees — must provide the non-Federal share (at least 10%) and absorb administrative and long-term stewardship responsibilities once federal maintenance funding ends after three years.
- Retail power providers and utilities that participate — while eligible to apply, they may need to align grant activities with regulatory obligations and could face scrutiny over the use of public funds for projects that also serve private customers.
- Department of Energy — must stand up the program rapidly and administer grants; DOE will bear program design and oversight costs that may exceed straightforward grant-making if monitoring energy impacts is complex.
- Municipalities and homeowners beyond the 3-year maintenance window — risk inheriting tree-care obligations and costs, including watering, pruning, and replacement for mortality after federal maintenance funds expire.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between achieving immediately measurable residential energy reductions (which favors short-term, targeted plantings and quantifiable ROI) and delivering the longer-term ecological, social, and climate benefits of urban trees (which require species diversity, long-term maintenance, and time to mature); the program’s design choices—short maintenance funding, energy-focused metrics, and limited appropriations—push toward quick, measurable wins at the potential expense of durable urban-forest resilience and equitable long-term stewardship.
The bill ties a short-term, energy-focused federal grant instrument to a long-term ecological intervention. Measuring and attributing residential energy savings to newly planted trees is technically challenging: benefits depend on species, placement, tree maturity and local building characteristics, and savings materialize over years.
The statute requires applicants to estimate expected reductions, but it does not prescribe standardized measurement protocols, leaving room for inconsistent or optimistic projections unless the Secretary establishes strict methods.
Funding and timing frame another tension. The 90% federal share lowers entry barriers for grantees, but the authorization level ($50 million per year) may not be sufficient to achieve the stated planting goal of 300,000 trees annually once realistic per-tree costs (including site prep, planting, and three years of maintenance) are considered.
The three-year maintenance cap reduces federal fiscal exposure but places the burden of long-term survival on local entities and households; tree mortality rates can be high without multi-year stewardship, weakening claims of durable energy savings. Finally, including retail power providers as eligible applicants opens the program to utilities, which could accelerate scale but also shift priorities toward projects that best serve load-management goals rather than community resilience or biodiversity.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.